GLAI vs BIDU vs AASP Stock Comparison

Global AI, Baidu and Agassi Sports Entertainment Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLAI Global AI, Inc.
$0.95 +18.7% 1M +115.9% 1Y
Market cap
$147.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$184.28K
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
BIDU Baidu, Inc.
$78.27 -10.4% 1M -39.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$18.33B
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Baidu leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Baidu 4, Global AI 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLAIBIDUAASPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $147.15M $2.73B $65.34M BIDU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -92.6x -5.7x -4.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.5% -0.9% — GLAI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -862.3% -2.6% — BIDU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +115.9% -39.2% +7.9% GLAI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +54.0%/yr -14.2%/yr +49.4%/yr GLAI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 254.6% 47.1% 81.5% BIDU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 14/100 55/100 — BIDU

Percentile Scorecard

GLAIBIDUAASP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLAIBIDUAASP
Valuation 27 #91 of 124 92 #11 of 124 4 #119 of 124
Growth 14 #97 of 113 19 #92 of 113 3 #110 of 113
Profitability 7 #102 of 109 55 #50 of 109 –
Financial Health 8 #117 of 127 56 #56 of 127 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 14 55 –
  • GLAI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • BIDU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AASP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLAIBIDUAASPSPY
1 month +18.7%-10.4%-5.5% -0.2%
3 months -12.0%-25.4%-20.0% +3.9%
6 months +35.7%-37.8%+11.8% +8.2%
Year to date -5.9%-40.1%-12.6% +12.9%
1 year +115.9%-39.2%+7.9% +12.3%
3 years +295.8%-26.9%+2,500.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +58.2%-9.9%+196.5% +23.3%
5 years +763.6%-53.6%+642.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +54.0%-14.2%+49.4% +10.9%
10 years +216.7%-55.3%+1,385.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.2%-7.7%+31.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLAIBIDUAASPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 254.6%47.1%81.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 306.4%45.0%108.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.151.660.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.46-0.830.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.9%-55.3%-85.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.1%-51.8%-25.7% -1.2%
52-week high $4.15$162.52$7.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.35$77.20$4.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLAIBIDUAASP
P/E now vs peer median -92.6xmedian 38.6x -5.6xmedian 38.6x -4.8xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 798.5xmedian 4.4x 1.5xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -94.4xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x -6.6xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -83.8xmedian 29.4x 5.6xmedian 29.4x -26.0xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median -43.3xmedian 3.3x 0.6xmedian 3.3x 25.8xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 1.28 0.10median 1.28 0.01median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLAIBIDUAASP
Revenue $184.28K $18.33B –
Gross profit $83.10K $1.81B –
Operating income -$1.59M -$999.00M –
Net income -$1.59M -$543.00M -$10.28M
Free cash flow -$1.76M $4.78B -$2.61M
R&D $1.82M $2.84B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $-11.24 $-1.08
Cash & equivalents $40.56K $3.61B $74.20K
Total debt – $10.97B –
Shares (diluted) 309.80M 42.88M 12.81M
Enterprise value $146.90M -$72.73B $64.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLAIBIDUAASP
P/E -92.6x -5.6x -4.8x
P/FCF -83.8x 5.6x -26.0x
P/Operating cash flow -88.9x 18.0x -26.2x
P/S 798.5x 1.5x –
P/B -43.3x 0.6x 25.8x
P/Tangible book -19.7x 0.7x 191.1x
EV/EBITDA -94.4x – -6.6x
EV/EBIT -92.6x -13.1x -6.6x
EV/Revenue 798.3x 0.7x –
EV/FCF -83.8x 2.7x -26.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -88.8x 8.9x -26.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 0.10 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLAIBIDUAASP
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.5% -0.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 44.2% -0.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12,345% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -36.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.3% -140.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -555.5% -32.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 2.1% -114.0% -272.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -405.8% -30.7% -465.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.0% -201.2% -282.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -255.6% -55.3% -375.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -96.3% 2,449% -262.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -529.9% -31.9% -224.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -103.9% 236.1% -265.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -542.3% -6.5% -225.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLAIBIDUAASP
Gross margin 45.1% 9.9% –
EBITDA margin -845.7% – –
Operating margin -862.3% -5.5% –
Pretax margin -859.5% -2.3% –
Net margin -862.3% -2.6% –
FCF margin -952.7% 26.1% –
Operating cash flow margin -898.6% 8.1% –
Return on equity – -1.3% -997.3%
Return on assets -36.9% -0.8% -388.6%
Return on invested capital – -2.0% –
Return on capital employed – -1.8% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x -2.7x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLAIBIDUAASP
Debt / assets – 15.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 2.3x –
Liabilities / assets 176.0% 40.1% 43.7%
Equity / assets -76.0% 59.9% 56.3%
Interest coverage – -2.7x –
Current ratio 0.0x 2.3x –
Quick ratio 0.0x 2.0x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.9x –
Altman Z-score 5.87 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLAIBIDUAASP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLAIBIDUAASP
Forward P/E – 14.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.42FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -29.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +21.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $19.51BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +5.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLAIBIDUAASP
Held by institutions – 17.5% –
Institutions holding – 490 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +8.1% –
Institutions buying – 236 –
Institutions selling – 144 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLAIBIDUAASP
GLAI 1.00 0.00 -0.06
BIDU 0.00 1.00 -0.03
AASP -0.06 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLAI, BIDU and AASP?

Baidu (BIDU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global AI (GLAI) $147.15M, Baidu (BIDU) $2.73B, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) $65.34M.

Which company is growing faster?

Global AI (GLAI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Global AI (GLAI) +34.5%, Baidu (BIDU) -0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Baidu (BIDU) has the highest net margin (Global AI (GLAI) -862.3%, Baidu (BIDU) -2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global AI (GLAI) returned the most: Global AI (GLAI) +115.9%, Baidu (BIDU) -39.2%, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) +7.9%. Over five years, Global AI (GLAI) compounded fastest (Global AI (GLAI) +54.0%/yr, Baidu (BIDU) -14.2%/yr, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) +49.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Baidu (BIDU) has been the steadiest (Global AI (GLAI) 254.6%, Baidu (BIDU) 47.1%, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) 81.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLAI, BIDU and AASP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Baidu (BIDU) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.