GIL vs XELB vs FIGS Stock Comparison

Gildan Activewear, XCel Brands and Figs Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.06 -2.2% 1M -34.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.37B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
XELB XCel Brands, Inc.
$0.34 -58.5% 1M -74.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.04M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.73M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.48 +52.5% 1M +151.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.44B
P/E
55.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Gildan Activewear leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Gildan Activewear 7, Figs 3, XCel Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGILXELBFIGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.37B $2.04M $3.44B GIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.2x -0.1x 55.6x GIL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x — 56.9x GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +38.0% -18.1% +24.7% GIL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.5% -362.5% 8.7% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% -44.6% — GIL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x -1.3x — XELB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.3% -74.8% +151.3% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.7%/yr -52.3%/yr -9.2%/yr GIL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 116.5% 70.3% GIL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 23/100 65/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

GILXELBFIGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGILXELBFIGS
Valuation 32 #31 of 45 21 #36 of 45 11 #40 of 45
Growth 50 #22 of 43 43 #25 of 43 100 #1 of 43
Profitability 45 #23 of 41 5 #39 of 41 80 #9 of 41
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 22 #41 of 52 96 #3 of 52
Shareholder Returns 21 #27 of 34 – 39 #21 of 34
Overall 35 23 65
  • GIL ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • XELB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • FIGS ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGILXELBFIGSSPY
1 month -2.2%-58.5%+52.5% -0.2%
3 months -22.6%-72.8%+98.3% +3.9%
6 months -30.8%-85.3%+36.4% +8.2%
Year to date -35.9%-68.5%+80.3% +12.9%
1 year -34.3%-74.8%+151.3% +12.3%
3 years +46.8%-96.7%+259.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +13.7%-67.9%+53.2% +23.3%
5 years +8.9%-97.5%-38.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +1.7%-52.3%-9.2% +10.9%
10 years +56.2%-99.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +4.6%-39.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGILXELBFIGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%116.5%70.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.5%118.0%65.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.211.350.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-0.642.15 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.8%-98.3%-91.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.8%-86.0%-1.7% -1.2%
52-week high $72.58$2.43$20.83 $779.14
52-week low $40.06$0.34$7.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGILXELBFIGS
P/E now vs peer median 30.4xmedian 16.4x -0.1xmedian 16.4x 55.1xmedian 16.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 4.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 9.9x -1.5xmedian 9.9x 37.1xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 33.2xmedian 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.2x 0.2xmedian 2.2x 7.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.40median 0.64 0.00median 0.64 0.90median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGILXELBFIGS
Revenue $4.72B $4.73M $710.08M
Gross profit $1.41B – $489.29M
Operating income $380.85M -$12.63M $68.19M
Net income -$60.80M -$17.25M $61.92M
Free cash flow $703.50M – $97.22M
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $-2.78 $0.32
Cash & equivalents $268.30M $399.00K $108.54M
Total debt $3.59B $49.59M –
Shares (diluted) 160.20M 6.16M 195.14M
Enterprise value $5.29B -$1.97M $2.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGILXELBFIGS
P/E 30.4x -0.1x 55.1x
P/FCF 10.5x – 33.2x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x – 29.9x
P/S 1.6x 0.5x 4.5x
P/B 2.2x 0.2x 7.3x
P/Tangible book 21.3x -0.2x 7.3x
EV/EBITDA 15.9x -1.5x 37.1x
EV/EBIT 28.2x -1.1x 43.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 2.9x 4.1x
EV/FCF 15.3x – 30.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.1x – 27.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.40 0.00 0.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGILXELBFIGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 38.0% -18.1% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.9% -39.5% 10.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.9% – 27.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.6% – 9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -29.8% 34.8% 583.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.0% 19.3% 41.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -127.3% 25.5% 762.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 6.9% 64.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -16.4% 71.0% 664.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.8% 34.0% 61.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 273.6% – 116.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.0% – 82.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 141.2% – 143.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% – 98.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGILXELBFIGS
Gross margin 30.0% – 68.9%
EBITDA margin 14.3% -191.4% 11.1%
Operating margin 8.1% -267.1% 9.6%
Pretax margin 7.6% -363.9% 10.8%
Net margin 4.5% -362.5% 8.7%
FCF margin 14.9% – 13.7%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% – 15.2%
Return on equity 1.5% -108.4% 14.2%
Return on assets 0.5% -48.3% 10.8%
Return on invested capital 5.2% -44.6% –
Return on capital employed 4.8% -41.9% 14.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -9.7x – 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 16.5% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGILXELBFIGS
Debt / assets 35.7% 37.2% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x -1.3x –
Debt / FCF 5.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 57.3% 24.1%
Equity / assets 33.2% 42.7% 75.9%
Interest coverage 1.8x -2.8x –
Current ratio 1.9x 0.3x 5.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.2x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 3.2x
Altman Z-score 1.64 -5.47 16.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGILXELBFIGS
Dividend yield 2.4% – –
Net buyback yield -3.7% – 0.9%
Shareholder yield -1.3% – 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGILXELBFIGS
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 – 56.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.81FY2026 $-1.59FY2026 $0.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +37.0%FY2026 – +89.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.3% – 0.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.67BFY2026 $6.58MFY2026 $728.69MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +56.6%FY2026 +33.1%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.5% +89.0% +18.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGILXELBFIGS
Held by institutions 100.0% 11.6% 99.1%
Institutions holding 463 11 242
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% -14.1% +3.1%
Institutions buying 197 6 139
Institutions selling 149 3 69
Buyers to sellers 1.32 2.00 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GILXELBFIGS
GIL 1.00 0.03 0.14
XELB 0.03 1.00 -0.04
FIGS 0.14 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIL, XELB and FIGS?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.37B, XCel Brands (XELB) $2.04M, Figs (FIGS) $3.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, GIL, XELB and FIGS?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.2x, XCel Brands (XELB) -0.1x, Figs (FIGS) 55.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 8.3x, Figs (FIGS) 56.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gildan Activewear (GIL) +38.0%, XCel Brands (XELB) -18.1%, Figs (FIGS) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 4.5%, XCel Brands (XELB) -362.5%, Figs (FIGS) 8.7%). On return on invested capital, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 5.2%, XCel Brands (XELB) -44.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Gildan Activewear (GIL) -34.3%, XCel Brands (XELB) -74.8%, Figs (FIGS) +151.3%. Over five years, Gildan Activewear (GIL) compounded fastest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) +1.7%/yr, XCel Brands (XELB) -52.3%/yr, Figs (FIGS) -9.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gildan Activewear (GIL) has been the steadiest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.2%, XCel Brands (XELB) 116.5%, Figs (FIGS) 70.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIL, XELB and FIGS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.