GIL vs MAMK Stock Comparison

Gildan Activewear and MaxsMaking Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.35 -1.5% 1M -33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.47B
P/E
30.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
2.43%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
MAMK MaxsMaking Inc.
$13.00 0.0% 1M +365.9% 1Y
Market cap
$201.73M
P/E
99,572x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Gildan Activewear leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Gildan Activewear 3, MaxsMaking 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGILMAMKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.47B $201.73M GIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.6x 99,572x GIL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +38.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.43% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -33.2% +365.9% MAMK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.3%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.3% 88.0% GIL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

GILMAMK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGILMAMK
Valuation 33 #15 of 22 5 #21 of 22
Growth 56 #9 of 19 –
Profitability 47 #10 of 18 –
Financial Health 33 #19 of 28 74 #8 of 28
Shareholder Returns 9 #11 of 12 –
Overall 36 –
  • GIL ranked among 28 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • MAMK ranked among 28 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGILMAMKSPY
1 month -1.5%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -20.4%0.0% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%0.0% +7.0%
Year to date -35.4%0.0% +12.2%
1 year -33.2%+365.9% +13.0%
3 years +47.9%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +13.9%— +23.1%
5 years +11.8%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.3%— +11.0%
10 years +57.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGILMAMKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.3%88.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.6%285.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.21-0.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.794.16 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.5%-46.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.4%-4.6% -1.8%
52-week high $72.58$13.63 $779.14
52-week low $40.30$2.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGILMAMK
P/E now vs peer median 30.6xmedian 15.1x 99,572xmedian 15.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 6.9xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 8.5x —median 8.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 13.1x -37.8xmedian 13.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.1x 16.0xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.41median 0.49 —median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGILMAMK
Revenue $4.72B –
Gross profit $1.41B –
Operating income $380.85M –
Net income -$60.80M –
Free cash flow $703.50M –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 –
Cash & equivalents $268.30M $122.38K
Total debt $3.59B –
Shares (diluted) 160.20M 15.52M
Enterprise value $6.39B $201.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGILMAMK
P/E 30.6x 99,572x
P/FCF 10.6x -37.8x
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x –
P/S 1.6x 6.9x
P/B 2.2x 16.0x
P/Tangible book 21.5x 16.0x
EV/EBITDA 16.0x –
EV/EBIT 28.3x –
EV/Revenue 2.3x –
EV/FCF 15.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.41 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGILMAMK
Revenue growth (1Y) 38.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -29.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -127.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -16.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 273.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 141.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGILMAMK
Gross margin 30.0% –
EBITDA margin 14.3% –
Operating margin 8.1% –
Pretax margin 7.6% –
Net margin 4.5% –
FCF margin 14.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% –
Return on equity 1.5% –
Return on assets 0.5% –
Return on invested capital 5.2% –
Return on capital employed 4.8% –
Asset turnover 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -9.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGILMAMK
Debt / assets 35.7% 19.5%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x –
Debt / FCF 5.1x –
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 42.3%
Equity / assets 33.2% 57.7%
Interest coverage 1.8x –
Current ratio 1.9x 3.1x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.65 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGILMAMK
Dividend yield 2.4% –
Net buyback yield -3.7% –
Shareholder yield -1.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGILMAMK
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.84FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +37.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +18.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.69BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +57.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGILMAMK
Held by institutions 100.0% –
Institutions holding 463 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% –
Institutions buying 197 –
Institutions selling 149 –
Buyers to sellers 1.32 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GILMAMK
GIL 1.00 0.00
MAMK 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIL and MAMK?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gildan Activewear (GIL) $7.47B, MaxsMaking (MAMK) $201.73M.

Which stock is cheaper, GIL and MAMK?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.6x, MaxsMaking (MAMK) 99,572x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year MaxsMaking (MAMK) returned the most: Gildan Activewear (GIL) -33.2%, MaxsMaking (MAMK) +365.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gildan Activewear (GIL) 2.43%. MaxsMaking (MAMK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gildan Activewear (GIL) has been the steadiest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.3%, MaxsMaking (MAMK) 88.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do GIL and MAMK move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.00, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, GIL and MAMK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.