GIL vs LEVI vs KTB Stock Comparison

Gildan Activewear, Levi Strauss and Kontoor Brands Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.48 -12.4% 1M -33.4% 1Y
Market cap
$6.46B
P/E
30.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co
$21.15 +7.7% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.45B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.68B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$76.01 +15.6% 1M -11.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.16B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Levi Strauss leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Levi Strauss 8, Gildan Activewear 2, Kontoor Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGILLEVIKTBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.46B $8.45B $4.16B LEVI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.6x 14.3x 16.7x LEVI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.4x 14.2x 13.9x GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +38.0% +6.6% +18.6% GIL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.5% 8.8% 8.5% LEVI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% 17.4% 14.5% LEVI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 0.3x — LEVI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -33.4% -0.9% -11.6% LEVI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.0%/yr -4.2%/yr +7.9%/yr KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 33.3% 47.9% LEVI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 70/100 53/100 LEVI

Percentile Scorecard

GILLEVIKTB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGILLEVIKTB
Valuation 33 #31 of 46 64 #17 of 46 24 #35 of 46
Growth 52 #21 of 43 69 #14 of 43 57 #19 of 43
Profitability 44 #24 of 42 85 #7 of 42 88 #6 of 42
Financial Health 29 #38 of 53 54 #25 of 53 31 #37 of 53
Shareholder Returns 18 #28 of 34 76 #9 of 34 67 #12 of 34
Overall 35 70 53
  • GIL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • LEVI ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGILLEVIKTBSPY
1 month -12.4%+7.7%+15.6% -1.0%
3 months -19.0%-13.8%-9.0% +2.9%
6 months -30.9%-5.2%+4.5% +6.4%
Year to date -35.2%+2.0%+24.4% +11.4%
1 year -33.4%-0.9%-11.6% +13.1%
3 years +41.2%+48.7%+60.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +12.2%+14.2%+17.0% +21.5%
5 years +10.2%-19.2%+46.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +2.0%-4.2%+7.9% +10.9%
10 years +53.5%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year +4.4%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureGILLEVIKTBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%33.3%47.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.6%30.0%46.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.211.150.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.03-0.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.5%-56.1%-48.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.2%-17.2%-13.8% -2.5%
52-week high $72.58$25.53$88.17 $779.14
52-week low $40.30$17.91$57.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGILLEVIKTB
P/E now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 15.9x 13.8xmedian 15.9x 16.8xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 9.2x 8.6xmedian 9.2x —median 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 12.2x 12.7xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.2x 3.4xmedian 2.2x 6.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.41median 0.57 0.46median 0.57 2.23median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGILLEVIKTB
Revenue $4.72B $6.68B $2.95B
Gross profit $1.41B $4.20B $1.38B
Operating income $380.85M $753.80M $332.45M
Net income -$60.80M $589.70M $249.37M
Free cash flow $703.50M $643.00M –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $1.51 $4.49
Cash & equivalents $268.30M $641.40M $58.46M
Total debt $3.59B $1.04B $1.14B
Shares (diluted) 160.20M 390.62M 55.50M
Enterprise value $5.38B $5.03B $3.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGILLEVIKTB
P/E 30.7x 13.8x 16.8x
P/FCF 10.7x 12.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x 9.6x –
P/S 1.6x 1.2x 1.4x
P/B 2.2x 3.4x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 21.6x 3.7x 24.3x
EV/EBITDA 16.0x 8.6x –
EV/EBIT 28.4x 11.2x 15.8x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 1.3x 1.8x
EV/FCF 15.4x 13.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x 9.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.41 0.46 2.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGILLEVIKTB
Revenue growth (1Y) 38.0% 6.6% 18.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 2.9% 4.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.9% 8.0% 22.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 6.7% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -29.8% 11.6% 6.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.0% 30.5% 1.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -127.3% -2.2% -0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 29.2% 6.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -16.4% 0.1% 0.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.8% 30.4% 7.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 273.6% 52.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.0% 63.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 141.2% 98.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 92.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGILLEVIKTB
Gross margin 30.0% 62.8% 46.8%
EBITDA margin 14.3% 14.6% –
Operating margin 8.1% 11.3% 11.3%
Pretax margin 7.6% 11.5% 9.8%
Net margin 4.5% 8.8% 8.5%
FCF margin 14.9% 9.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 12.8% –
Return on equity 1.5% 25.2% 41.3%
Return on assets 0.5% 8.7% 9.3%
Return on invested capital 5.2% 17.4% 14.5%
Return on capital employed 4.8% 15.7% 16.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.0x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -9.7x 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGILLEVIKTB
Debt / assets 35.7% 15.1% 42.9%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 0.3x –
Debt / FCF 5.1x 1.6x –
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 65.1% 76.8%
Equity / assets 33.2% 34.9% 23.2%
Interest coverage 1.8x 14.4x 4.9x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.65 3.02 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGILLEVIKTB
Dividend yield 2.4% 2.8% 2.8%
Net buyback yield -3.7% 1.0% –
Shareholder yield -1.3% 3.8% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGILLEVIKTB
Forward P/E 8.4xFY2026 14.2xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.83FY2026 $1.49FY2026 $5.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +37.6%FY2026 +11.2%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +6.7% +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.69BFY2026 $7.03BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.1%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.1% -3.7% -5.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGILLEVIKTB
Held by institutions 100.0% 87.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 463 313 429
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% +2.6% +6.9%
Institutions buying 197 185 214
Institutions selling 149 78 137
Buyers to sellers 1.32 2.37 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GILLEVIKTB
GIL 1.00 0.40 0.34
LEVI 0.40 1.00 0.48
KTB 0.34 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIL, LEVI and KTB?

Levi Strauss (LEVI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.46B, Levi Strauss (LEVI) $8.45B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, GIL, LEVI and KTB?

Levi Strauss (LEVI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.6x, Levi Strauss (LEVI) 14.3x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 8.4x, Levi Strauss (LEVI) 14.2x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gildan Activewear (GIL) +38.0%, Levi Strauss (LEVI) +6.6%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Levi Strauss (LEVI) has the highest net margin (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 4.5%, Levi Strauss (LEVI) 8.8%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%). On return on invested capital, Levi Strauss (LEVI) leads (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 5.2%, Levi Strauss (LEVI) 17.4%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Levi Strauss (LEVI) returned the most: Gildan Activewear (GIL) -33.4%, Levi Strauss (LEVI) -0.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) -11.6%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) +2.0%/yr, Levi Strauss (LEVI) -4.2%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Levi Strauss (LEVI) has been the steadiest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.2%, Levi Strauss (LEVI) 33.3%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIL, LEVI and KTB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Levi Strauss (LEVI) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.