GIB vs KHOBF vs SAIC Stock Comparison

Cgi, Kheoba and Science Applications International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GIB Cgi Inc
$79.64 +17.5% 1M -9.5% 1Y
Market cap
$17.66B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.99B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
6 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cgi leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cgi 6, Science Applications International 3, Kheoba 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGIBKHOBFSAICLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.66B $20.23M $6.30B GIB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.1x — 16.6x SAIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.3x — 14.4x GIB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.2% — -0.8% GIB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% — 5.1% GIB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 12.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — 3.1x GIB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.5% 0.0% +60.4% SAIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr — +11.6%/yr SAIC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.9% 0.0% 39.6% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 — 47/100 GIB

Percentile Scorecard

GIBKHOBFSAIC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGIBKHOBFSAIC
Valuation 45 #28 of 50 – 49 #26 of 50
Growth 73 #13 of 45 – 34 #30 of 45
Profitability 85 #7 of 41 – 70 #13 of 41
Financial Health 30 #44 of 62 82 #20 of 108 21 #49 of 62
Shareholder Returns 52 #15 of 30 – 62 #12 of 30
Overall 57 – 47
  • GIB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SAIC ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGIBKHOBFSAICSPY
1 month +17.5%0.0%+12.8% -0.2%
3 months +11.5%0.0%+23.0% +3.9%
6 months +8.3%0.0%+57.6% +8.2%
Year to date -13.7%0.0%+48.5% +12.9%
1 year -9.5%0.0%+60.4% +12.3%
3 years -14.8%—+39.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -5.2%—+11.8% +23.3%
5 years -11.4%—+72.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.4%—+11.6% +10.9%
10 years +71.0%—+119.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +5.5%—+8.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGIBKHOBFSAICSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.9%0.0%39.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.0%—39.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.210.000.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29—1.53 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.9%-37.5%-46.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.0%0.0%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $94.81$2.50$149.52 $779.14
52-week low $61.28$2.50$82.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGIBKHOBFSAIC
P/E now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 17.4x —median 28.3x 16.7xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 0.7x —median 2.8x 0.8xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 10.7x —median 17.3x 11.5xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 11.5x —median 15.8x 10.1xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.4x 122.0xmedian 3.2x 4.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.40median 1.51 —median 0.85 -12.05median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGIBKHOBFSAIC
Revenue $8.99B – $7.40B
Gross profit – – $936.00M
Operating income – – $592.00M
Net income $1.25B – $380.00M
Free cash flow $1.30B – $619.00M
EPS (diluted) $4.34 – $8.88
Cash & equivalents $440.31M $318.16K $126.00M
Total debt $2.61B – $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 225.49M 8.09M 42.80M
Enterprise value $15.46B $19.91M $5.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGIBKHOBFSAIC
P/E 18.1x – 16.7x
P/FCF 13.6x – 10.1x
P/Operating cash flow 12.7x – 9.5x
P/S 2.0x – 0.8x
P/B – 122.0x 4.4x
P/Tangible book – 125.8x 8.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.7x – 11.5x
EV/EBIT 14.1x – 14.6x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 1.2x
EV/FCF 15.3x – 14.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.3x – 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.40 – -12.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGIBKHOBFSAIC
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.2% – -0.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.0% – -1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 1.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 6.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -8.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 2.2% – -4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.7% – -8.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 196.7% – 4.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.3% – -1.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 23.0% – 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.2% – 9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 7.5% – 40.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – 8.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGIBKHOBFSAIC
Gross margin – – 12.6%
EBITDA margin 20.7% – 10.1%
Operating margin – – 8.0%
Pretax margin 14.9% – 6.2%
Net margin 10.9% – 5.1%
FCF margin 14.5% – 8.4%
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% – 8.9%
Return on equity – – 26.6%
Return on assets 7.7% – 7.1%
Return on invested capital – – 12.6%
Return on capital employed 15.9% – 13.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x – 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGIBKHOBFSAIC
Debt / assets 74.4% – 45.8%
Debt / equity – – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – 3.1x
Debt / FCF 2.0x – 4.0x
Liabilities / assets – 49.8% 73.5%
Equity / assets – 50.2% 26.5%
Interest coverage 20.2x – 4.5x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.0x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.4x 2.0x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.9x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 3.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGIBKHOBFSAIC
Dividend yield 0.9% – 1.0%
Net buyback yield 5.6% – 7.3%
Shareholder yield 6.5% – 8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 17.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -6.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -6.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGIBKHOBFSAIC
Forward P/E 13.3xFY2026 – 14.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.99FY2026 – $10.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +0.5%FY2026 – -3.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.9% – +4.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.21BFY2026 – $7.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 – +4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.3% – +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGIBKHOBFSAIC
Held by institutions – – 83.0%
Institutions holding – – 433
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +0.7%
Institutions buying – – 214
Institutions selling – – 142
Buyers to sellers – – 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GIBKHOBFSAIC
GIB 1.00 – 0.39
KHOBF – – –
SAIC 0.39 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIB, KHOBF and SAIC?

Cgi (GIB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cgi (GIB) $17.66B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M, Science Applications International (SAIC) $6.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, GIB, KHOBF and SAIC?

Science Applications International (SAIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cgi (GIB) 18.1x, Science Applications International (SAIC) 16.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cgi (GIB) is cheapest (Cgi (GIB) 13.3x, Science Applications International (SAIC) 14.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cgi (GIB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cgi (GIB) +6.2%, Science Applications International (SAIC) -0.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cgi (GIB) has the highest net margin (Cgi (GIB) 10.9%, Science Applications International (SAIC) 5.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Science Applications International (SAIC) returned the most: Cgi (GIB) -9.5%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Science Applications International (SAIC) +60.4%. Over five years, Science Applications International (SAIC) compounded fastest (Cgi (GIB) -2.4%/yr, Science Applications International (SAIC) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cgi (GIB) 0.00%, Science Applications International (SAIC) 0.01%. Cgi (GIB) and Kheoba (KHOBF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Cgi (GIB) 32.9%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Science Applications International (SAIC) 39.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIB, KHOBF and SAIC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cgi (GIB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.