GHM vs ITT vs WTS Stock Comparison

Graham, Itt and Watts Water Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GHM Graham Corp
$70.98 -18.6% 1M +19.8% 1Y
Market cap
$832.38M
P/E
69.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$261.15M
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
ITT Itt Inc.
$194.37 -5.7% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$17.38B
P/E
41.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
0.78%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Watts Water Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Watts Water Technologies 7, Itt 4, Graham 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGHMITTWTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $832.38M $17.38B $12.05B ITT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 69.7x 41.2x 31.5x WTS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.5x 24.5x 27.3x ITT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.2% +28.1% +17.1% ITT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.5% 8.9% 14.3% WTS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% 6.0% 16.8% WTS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x -0.4x WTS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.78% 0.64% ITT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.8% +10.0% +30.6% WTS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +41.1%/yr +15.5%/yr +14.1%/yr GHM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.5% 32.9% 27.2% WTS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 47/100 70/100 WTS

Percentile Scorecard

GHMITTWTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGHMITTWTS
Valuation 17 #169 of 203 19 #165 of 203 30 #143 of 203
Growth 60 #75 of 188 65 #67 of 188 78 #43 of 188
Profitability 32 #125 of 183 52 #88 of 183 91 #17 of 183
Financial Health 37 #138 of 217 31 #151 of 217 90 #22 of 217
Shareholder Returns 10 #138 of 153 66 #52 of 153 61 #60 of 153
Overall 31 47 70
  • GHM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WTS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGHMITTWTSSPY
1 month -18.6%-5.7%+0.9% -0.2%
3 months -28.8%-2.3%+4.2% +3.9%
6 months -23.3%-9.0%+21.1% +8.2%
Year to date +10.5%+12.0%+30.8% +12.9%
1 year +19.8%+10.0%+30.6% +12.3%
3 years +359.7%+110.6%+113.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +66.3%+28.2%+28.7% +23.3%
5 years +458.5%+105.4%+93.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +41.1%+15.5%+14.1% +10.9%
10 years +295.2%+464.2%+500.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.7%+18.9%+19.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGHMITTWTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.5%32.9%27.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.9%32.0%25.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.131.270.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.360.311.13 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-38.6%-44.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -42.7%-12.3%-7.9% -1.2%
52-week high $123.79$221.69$392.27 $779.14
52-week low $53.56$169.49$263.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGHMITTWTS
P/E now vs peer median 69.7xmedian 25.2x 41.2xmedian 25.2x 31.5xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.9x 3.7xmedian 1.9x 4.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 34.6xmedian 14.0x 21.8xmedian 14.0x 19.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -136.1xmedian 21.7x —median 21.7x 34.5xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.3x 3.6xmedian 2.3x 5.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.04median 1.32 -13.40median 1.32 2.45median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGHMITTWTS
Revenue $261.15M $4.74B $2.68B
Gross profit $60.83M $1.67B $1.31B
Operating income $14.21M $680.00M $512.10M
Net income $11.82M $421.50M $383.80M
Free cash flow -$6.12M – $349.40M
R&D – $123.80M –
EPS (diluted) $1.01 $4.69 $11.46
Cash & equivalents $26.95M $590.80M $347.90M
Total debt $13.00M $2.87B $108.00M
Shares (diluted) 11.71M 89.80M 33.50M
Enterprise value $756.02M $13.93B $10.47B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGHMITTWTS
P/E 69.7x 41.2x 31.5x
P/FCF -136.1x – 34.5x
P/Operating cash flow 150.2x – 30.3x
P/S 3.2x 3.7x 4.5x
P/B 4.3x 3.6x 5.5x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 10.0x 6.3x
EV/EBITDA 34.6x 21.8x 19.8x
EV/EBIT 56.7x 28.9x 23.1x
EV/Revenue 3.1x 4.1x 4.4x
EV/FCF -131.7x – 33.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 145.3x – 29.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.04 -13.40 2.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGHMITTWTS
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.2% 28.1% 17.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 14.5% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.2% 27.8% 18.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.1% 17.7% 13.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.1% -2.1% 26.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 53.2% 8.0% 15.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -14.7% -18.6% 23.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 71.8% -0.3% 12.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.7% -28.1% 23.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 66.8% -3.1% 12.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -58.5% – 12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.0% – 12.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 36.6% – 10.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.7% – 11.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGHMITTWTS
Gross margin 23.3% 35.2% 48.9%
EBITDA margin 8.9% 19.0% 22.3%
Operating margin 5.4% 14.4% 19.1%
Pretax margin 5.3% 12.8% 19.0%
Net margin 4.5% 8.9% 14.3%
FCF margin -2.3% – 13.1%
Operating cash flow margin 2.1% – 14.9%
Return on equity 7.1% 8.9% 17.9%
Return on assets 3.4% 3.8% 13.0%
Return on invested capital 7.0% 6.0% 16.8%
Return on capital employed 7.8% 7.7% 21.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.8% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGHMITTWTS
Debt / assets – 26.0% 3.7%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x -0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 0.3x
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 56.4% 25.8%
Equity / assets 52.8% 43.6% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 6.8x 50.2x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.3x 2.7x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.8x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.30 2.76 12.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGHMITTWTS
Dividend yield – 0.8% 0.6%
Net buyback yield -6.1% 0.7% 0.1%
Shareholder yield -6.1% 1.5% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.5% 19.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 21.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 14.8% 21.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.7% 20.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGHMITTWTS
Forward P/E 43.5xFY2026 24.5xFY2026 27.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.63FY2026 $7.93FY2026 $13.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +45.5%FY2026 +18.0%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.7% +18.2% +13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $271.48MFY2026 $5.39BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.7%FY2026 +36.8%FY2026 +23.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.0% +9.2% -5.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGHMITTWTS
Held by institutions 89.3% 98.4% 80.9%
Institutions holding 222 715 579
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.8% +3.4% +1.9%
Institutions buying 145 326 295
Institutions selling 56 252 187
Buyers to sellers 2.59 1.29 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GHMITTWTS
GHM 1.00 0.45 0.47
ITT 0.45 1.00 0.50
WTS 0.47 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GHM, ITT and WTS?

Itt (ITT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Graham (GHM) $832.38M, Itt (ITT) $17.38B, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) $12.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, GHM, ITT and WTS?

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Graham (GHM) 69.7x, Itt (ITT) 41.2x, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 31.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Itt (ITT) is cheapest (Graham (GHM) 43.5x, Itt (ITT) 24.5x, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 27.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Itt (ITT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Graham (GHM) +21.2%, Itt (ITT) +28.1%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +17.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) has the highest net margin (Graham (GHM) 4.5%, Itt (ITT) 8.9%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 14.3%). On return on invested capital, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) leads (Graham (GHM) 7.0%, Itt (ITT) 6.0%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 16.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Watts Water Technologies (WTS) returned the most: Graham (GHM) +19.8%, Itt (ITT) +10.0%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +30.6%. Over five years, Graham (GHM) compounded fastest (Graham (GHM) +41.1%/yr, Itt (ITT) +15.5%/yr, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) +14.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Itt (ITT) has the highest dividend yield: Graham (GHM) 0.00%, Itt (ITT) 0.78%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 0.64%. Graham (GHM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) has been the steadiest (Graham (GHM) 54.5%, Itt (ITT) 32.9%, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) 27.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GHM, ITT and WTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Watts Water Technologies (WTS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.