GFL vs WBI vs OSK Stock Comparison

GFL Environmental, WaterBridge Infrastructure and Oshkosh Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$43.57 +5.1% 1M -3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$16.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
0.18%
Solid Waste Industrials
3 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$138.12 +3.9% 1M +0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$8.54B
P/E
15.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.61B
Div. yield
1.61%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Oshkosh leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Oshkosh 6, GFL Environmental 3, WaterBridge Infrastructure 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGFLWBIOSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.16B $3.72B $8.54B GFL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -71.8x 30.7x 15.5x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 70.3x 49.4x 13.8x OSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +110.0% +2.2% WBI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.2% 5.2% WBI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.7% 3.6% 11.4% OSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 4.3x 0.7x GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.18% 0.50% 1.61% OSK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.4% +25.3% +0.4% WBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr — +5.2%/yr OSK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.2% 45.2% 40.5% GFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 41/100 72/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

GFLWBIOSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGFLWBIOSK
Valuation 87 #3 of 16 9 #32 of 35 95 #12 of 203
Growth 15 #12 of 14 100 #1 of 34 60 #75 of 188
Profitability 39 #9 of 14 21 #27 of 34 62 #71 of 184
Financial Health 87 #3 of 16 74 #10 of 35 53 #103 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 0 #31 of 31 90 #17 of 153
Overall 57 41 72
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • WBI ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • OSK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGFLWBIOSKSPY
1 month +5.1%+3.9%+3.9% +0.9%
3 months +8.2%-7.3%-3.4% +5.9%
6 months +8.0%+1.1%-6.3% +8.5%
Year to date +1.4%+50.7%+9.9% +13.3%
1 year -3.4%+25.3%+0.4% +12.4%
3 years +54.5%—+60.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +15.6%—+17.0% +23.5%
5 years +5.9%—+29.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.2%—+5.2% +11.0%
10 years ——+160.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+10.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGFLWBIOSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.2%45.2%40.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.4%47.2%40.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.240.321.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.560.01 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.9%-30.7%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-16.8%-22.4% -0.9%
52-week high $46.51$36.22$177.94 $779.14
52-week low $33.54$18.76$118.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGFLWBIOSK
P/E now vs peer median -71.8xmedian 31.3x 30.7xmedian 19.6x 15.5xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.1x 4.8xmedian 2.7x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 14.3x 14.4xmedian 10.9x 8.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 16.9x -30.4xmedian 16.6x 7.6xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.7x 2.0xmedian 2.5x 1.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.01median 2.37 —median 1.72 1.21median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGFLWBIOSK
Revenue – $777.97M $10.61B
Gross profit – $205.03M $1.69B
Operating income $1.72B $126.63M $797.60M
Net income -$385.60M $53.91M $556.30M
Free cash flow $2.88B -$122.30M $1.12B
EPS (diluted) $-0.59 $0.98 $8.87
Cash & equivalents $296.50M $47.62M $403.60M
Total debt $14.20M $1.62B $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 378.69M 48.76M 62.75M
Enterprise value $14.35B $4.63B $7.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGFLWBIOSK
P/E -71.8x 30.7x 15.5x
P/FCF 5.6x -30.4x 7.6x
P/Operating cash flow 9.4x 14.3x 6.6x
P/S 2.3x 4.8x 0.8x
P/B 1.4x 2.0x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 4.1x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 4.9x 14.4x 8.9x
EV/EBIT 9.2x 41.8x 11.6x
EV/Revenue – 6.8x 0.9x
EV/FCF 5.5x -43.3x 8.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x 20.3x 7.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.01 – 1.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGFLWBIOSK
Revenue growth (1Y) – 110.0% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 85.4% -10.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.2% 89.5% -16.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.1% – 8.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -110.8% 325.5% -14.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -45.6% – 11.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -106.3% – -11.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -70.7% – 12.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.2% – 60.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.6% – 57.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.5% – 99.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.2% – 49.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGFLWBIOSK
Gross margin – 26.4% 15.9%
EBITDA margin – 47.3% 9.8%
Operating margin – 16.3% 7.5%
Pretax margin – 7.2% 6.5%
Net margin – 6.2% 5.2%
FCF margin – -15.7% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 33.5% 12.3%
Return on equity -4.0% 2.9% 12.4%
Return on assets -1.5% 1.4% 5.6%
Return on invested capital 9.7% 3.6% 11.4%
Return on capital employed 7.6% 3.4% 11.5%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.4x 4.8x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.3% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGFLWBIOSK
Debt / assets 0.0% 41.0% 11.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.9x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 4.3x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 0.0x -13.2x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 53.6% 55.0%
Equity / assets 41.0% 46.4% 45.0%
Interest coverage 2.8x – 6.6x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.5x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.5x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.39 3.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGFLWBIOSK
Dividend yield 0.2% 0.5% 1.6%
Net buyback yield – – 4.1%
Shareholder yield 0.2% 0.5% 5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGFLWBIOSK
Forward P/E 70.3xFY2026 49.4xFY2026 13.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.62FY2026 $0.61FY2026 $10.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.7%FY2026 – -7.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.4% +4.9% +46.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.10BFY2026 $858.29MFY2026 $10.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.5%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.3% +19.5% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGFLWBIOSK
Held by institutions 74.8% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 323 164 598
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.3% +29.4% +5.1%
Institutions buying 185 101 309
Institutions selling 101 41 188
Buyers to sellers 1.83 2.46 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GFLWBIOSK
GFL 1.00 0.05 0.10
WBI 0.05 1.00 0.09
OSK 0.10 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GFL, WBI and OSK?

GFL Environmental (GFL) is the largest by market capitalisation: GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.16B, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) $3.72B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, GFL, WBI and OSK?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (GFL Environmental (GFL) -71.8x, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 30.7x, Oshkosh (OSK) 15.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Oshkosh (OSK) is cheapest (GFL Environmental (GFL) 70.3x, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 49.4x, Oshkosh (OSK) 13.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) +110.0%, Oshkosh (OSK) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) has the highest net margin (WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 6.2%, Oshkosh (OSK) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Oshkosh (OSK) leads (GFL Environmental (GFL) 9.7%, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 3.6%, Oshkosh (OSK) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) returned the most: GFL Environmental (GFL) -3.4%, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) +25.3%, Oshkosh (OSK) +0.4%. Over five years, Oshkosh (OSK) compounded fastest (GFL Environmental (GFL) +1.2%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +5.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Oshkosh (OSK) has the highest dividend yield: GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.18%, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 0.50%, Oshkosh (OSK) 1.61%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GFL Environmental (GFL) has been the steadiest (GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.2%, WaterBridge Infrastructure (WBI) 45.2%, Oshkosh (OSK) 40.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GFL, WBI and OSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oshkosh (OSK) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.