GEV vs TSLA vs HWM Stock Comparison

GE Vernova, Tesla and Howmet Aerospace Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FPS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GEV GE Vernova Inc.
$832.59 -15.9% 1M +51.9% 1Y
Market cap
$206.49B
P/E
19.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.04B
Div. yield
–
Power Equipment Industrials
4 wins
TSLA Tesla, Inc.
$385.19 +1.7% 1M -13.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.11T
P/E
345.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$103.57B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$213.55 -7.0% 1M +4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$80.86B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.73B
Div. yield
0.00%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Howmet Aerospace leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Howmet Aerospace 5, GE Vernova 4, Tesla 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGEVTSLAHWMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $206.49B $1.11T $80.86B TSLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.9x 345.8x 39.4x GEV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 239.2x 41.1x HWM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.9% +8.3% +22.0% HWM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.5% 3.1% 21.1% GEV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.1% 2.7% 21.5% HWM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.3x -3.5x 1.4x TSLA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.9% -13.3% +4.2% GEV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.1%/yr +45.0%/yr HWM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.9% 45.1% 36.7% HWM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 48/100 73/100 GEV

Percentile Scorecard

GEVTSLAHWM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGEVTSLAHWM
Valuation 71 #19 of 63 19 #40 of 49 39 #62 of 101
Growth 98 #2 of 60 40 #30 of 49 91 #10 of 98
Profitability 93 #5 of 57 76 #12 of 47 99 #2 of 97
Financial Health 58 #31 of 72 92 #5 of 53 47 #57 of 107
Shareholder Returns 97 #2 of 32 14 #26 of 30 88 #9 of 66
Overall 83 48 73
  • GEV ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • TSLA ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HWM ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGEVTSLAHWMSPY
1 month -15.9%+1.7%-7.0% -1.0%
3 months -18.2%+19.8%-26.7% -0.4%
6 months -25.6%-3.4%-16.7% +4.5%
Year to date +27.4%-14.3%+4.2% +12.4%
1 year +51.9%-13.3%+4.2% +13.6%
3 years —+75.1%+345.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year —+20.5%+64.5% +20.8%
5 years —-5.4%+539.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year —-1.1%+45.0% +10.4%
10 years —+2,933.0%+1,474.9% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+40.7%+31.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureGEVTSLAHWMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.9%45.1%36.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.6%46.6%37.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.012.111.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.95-0.290.11 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-73.5%-36.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.1%-21.4%-27.0% -1.6%
52-week high $1,174.86$489.88$292.71 $779.14
52-week low $547.96$298.32$185.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGEVTSLAHWM
P/E now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 26.4x 387.8xmedian 21.1x 41.4xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 2.6x 12.0xmedian 0.5x 8.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 48.5xmedian 19.6x 119.2xmedian 9.2x 29.2xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 29.9x 377.8xmedian 8.8x 44.0xmedian 26.9x
P/B now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 1.8x 13.9xmedian 1.0x 14.8xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.71 -11.60median 1.08 0.84median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGEVTSLAHWM
Revenue $44.04B $103.57B $9.73B
Gross profit $9.57B $19.97B $3.56B
Operating income $2.83B $3.47B $2.73B
Net income $10.37B $3.28B $2.05B
Free cash flow $17.12B $3.30B $1.93B
R&D $1.36B $8.86B $38.00M
EPS (diluted) $38.69 $0.91 $5.13
Cash & equivalents $16.76B $17.85B $507.00M
Total debt $2.80B $9.52B $4.83B
Shares (diluted) 268.00M 3.54B 400.00M
Enterprise value $157.58B $935.07B $76.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGEVTSLAHWM
P/E 21.4x 387.8x 41.4x
P/FCF 12.9x 377.8x 44.0x
P/Operating cash flow 11.5x 66.7x 35.4x
P/S 5.0x 12.0x 8.7x
P/B 17.6x 13.9x 14.8x
P/Tangible book 26.9x 14.0x 17.3x
EV/EBITDA 48.5x 119.2x 29.2x
EV/EBIT 73.0x 349.7x 32.7x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 11.7x 9.2x
EV/FCF 12.1x 367.0x 46.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.7x 64.8x 37.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -11.60 0.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGEVTSLAHWM
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.9% 8.3% 22.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.6% 14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.5% 22.8% 33.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% 26.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 104.9% -23.5% 36.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -31.4% 35.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 504.8% -36.2% 41.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -32.8% 47.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 524.3% -36.9% 43.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -33.4% 49.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 460.4% 18.8% 40.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.4% 38.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 592.1% -51.7% 50.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.8% 41.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGEVTSLAHWM
Gross margin 21.7% 19.3% 36.6%
EBITDA margin 9.7% 9.8% 31.4%
Operating margin 6.4% 3.3% 28.1%
Pretax margin 20.2% 4.1% 25.8%
Net margin 23.5% 3.1% 21.1%
FCF margin 38.9% 3.2% 19.8%
Operating cash flow margin 43.6% 18.1% 24.7%
Return on equity 80.8% 3.7% 35.7%
Return on assets 12.4% 2.1% 15.5%
Return on invested capital 18.1% 2.7% 21.5%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 3.1% 24.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 5.7x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 4.2% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGEVTSLAHWM
Debt / assets 3.2% 6.0% 36.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.1x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.3x -3.5x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 2.9x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 85.5% 43.0% 56.6%
Equity / assets 14.5% 57.0% 43.4%
Interest coverage 13.0x 10.0x –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.7x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.2x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.47 12.39 8.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGEVTSLAHWM
Dividend yield 0.2% – 0.2%
Net buyback yield 2.9% -0.1% 1.5%
Shareholder yield 3.1% -0.1% 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 23.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 43.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGEVTSLAHWM
Forward P/E – 239.2xFY2026 41.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.61FY2026 $5.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -3.0%FY2026 +37.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +32.3% +31.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $112.97BFY2026 $10.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.1%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.2% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGEVTSLAHWM
Held by institutions 79.1% 42.6% 91.0%
Institutions holding 3,422 4,268 1,602
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% +7.4% +0.7%
Institutions buying 1,955 2,376 908
Institutions selling 985 1,360 485
Buyers to sellers 1.98 1.75 1.87

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GEVTSLAHWM
GEV 1.00 0.33 0.35
TSLA 0.33 1.00 0.16
HWM 0.35 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GEV, TSLA and HWM?

Tesla (TSLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: GE Vernova (GEV) $206.49B, Tesla (TSLA) $1.11T, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) $80.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, GEV, TSLA and HWM?

GE Vernova (GEV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (GE Vernova (GEV) 19.9x, Tesla (TSLA) 345.8x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 39.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) is cheapest (Tesla (TSLA) 239.2x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 41.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: GE Vernova (GEV) +16.9%, Tesla (TSLA) +8.3%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +22.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

GE Vernova (GEV) has the highest net margin (GE Vernova (GEV) 23.5%, Tesla (TSLA) 3.1%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.1%). On return on invested capital, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads (GE Vernova (GEV) 18.1%, Tesla (TSLA) 2.7%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GE Vernova (GEV) returned the most: GE Vernova (GEV) +51.9%, Tesla (TSLA) -13.3%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +4.2%. Over five years, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) compounded fastest (Tesla (TSLA) -1.1%/yr, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +45.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: GE Vernova (GEV) 0.00%, Tesla (TSLA) 0.00%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 0.00%. GE Vernova (GEV) and Tesla (TSLA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been the steadiest (GE Vernova (GEV) 54.9%, Tesla (TSLA) 45.1%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GEV, TSLA and HWM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.