GEV vs HUBB vs AMSC Stock Comparison

GE Vernova, Hubbell and American Superconductor Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GEV GE Vernova Inc.
$855.38 -10.6% 1M +46.4% 1Y
Market cap
$235.60B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$41.37B
Div. yield
–
Power Equipment Industrials
7 wins
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$459.62 -1.4% 1M +5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$23.28B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.22B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

GE Vernova leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (GE Vernova 7, Hubbell 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGEVHUBBAMSCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $235.60B $23.28B $1.20B GEV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.7x 25.8x — GEV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 22.9x 28.2x HUBB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.0% +10.6% — GEV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.0% 14.5% — GEV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 12.8% — HUBB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.4x 3.3x — GEV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +46.4% +5.8% -57.4% GEV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +19.3%/yr +8.2%/yr HUBB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.8% 32.2% 85.6% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 54/100 — GEV

Percentile Scorecard

GEVHUBBAMSC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGEVHUBBAMSC
Valuation 75 #16 of 61 31 #140 of 203 –
Growth 98 #2 of 58 67 #62 of 187 –
Profitability 91 #6 of 55 89 #21 of 185 –
Financial Health 57 #31 of 71 14 #189 of 219 76 #18 of 71
Shareholder Returns 96 #2 of 29 66 #52 of 153 –
Overall 83 54 –
  • GEV ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AMSC ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGEVHUBBAMSCSPY
1 month -10.6%-1.4%-15.4% -0.8%
3 months -14.2%-7.7%-16.8% +3.5%
6 months -23.6%-17.2%-48.8% +7.0%
Year to date +30.9%+3.5%-11.7% +12.2%
1 year +46.4%+5.8%-57.4% +13.0%
3 years —+63.6%+309.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+17.8%+60.0% +23.1%
5 years —+141.1%+48.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+19.3%+8.2% +11.0%
10 years —+336.9%+261.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+15.9%+13.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGEVHUBBAMSCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.8%32.2%85.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%34.5%98.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.141.223.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.860.18-0.67 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-33.1%-82.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.2%-17.6%-59.7% -1.8%
52-week high $1,174.86$557.85$63.01 $779.14
52-week low $547.96$407.36$25.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGEVHUBBAMSC
P/E now vs peer median 24.1xmedian 25.4x 27.0xmedian 26.0x —median 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 2.1x 3.9xmedian 1.9x —median 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 72.4xmedian 17.5x 19.6xmedian 14.0x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 27.3x 26.9xmedian 21.4x —median 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 1.7x 6.2xmedian 2.2x 2.2xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 2.04median 1.26 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGEVHUBBAMSC
Revenue $41.37B $6.22B –
Gross profit $8.36B $2.19B –
Operating income $1.80B $1.25B –
Net income $9.54B $907.10M –
Free cash flow $12.44B $901.40M –
R&D $1.31B – –
EPS (diluted) $35.29 $16.98 –
Cash & equivalents $13.12B $378.60M $140.69M
Total debt $2.79B $11.71B –
Shares (diluted) 270.00M 53.10M 44.94M
Enterprise value $195.52B $21.19B $496.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGEVHUBBAMSC
P/E 24.1x 27.0x –
P/FCF 18.3x 26.9x –
P/Operating cash flow 16.1x 22.7x –
P/S 5.5x 3.9x –
P/B 17.4x 6.2x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 26.5x 33.1x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 72.4x 19.6x –
EV/EBIT 120.9x 23.3x –
EV/Revenue 5.3x 4.7x –
EV/FCF 17.5x 32.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 15.4x 27.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGEVHUBBAMSC
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.0% 10.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.7% 12.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 174.7% 10.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 11.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 719.9% 8.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 12.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 742.6% 9.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 295.4% 11.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 359.3% 14.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 11.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGEVHUBBAMSC
Gross margin 20.2% 35.2% –
EBITDA margin 7.3% 24.0% –
Operating margin 4.3% 20.2% –
Pretax margin 19.0% 18.2% –
Net margin 23.0% 14.5% –
FCF margin 30.1% 14.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 34.2% 17.2% –
Return on equity 67.6% 23.6% –
Return on assets 12.2% 9.0% –
Return on invested capital 10.7% 12.8% –
Return on capital employed 8.0% 15.2% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGEVHUBBAMSC
Debt / assets 3.5% 45.4% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.4x 3.3x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 6.0x –
Liabilities / assets 83.8% 66.9% 24.9%
Equity / assets 16.2% 33.1% 75.1%
Interest coverage 9.5x – –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.6x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 2.68 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGEVHUBBAMSC
Dividend yield 0.2% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield 2.4% 0.8% –
Shareholder yield 2.5% 2.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGEVHUBBAMSC
Forward P/E – 22.9xFY2026 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $20.07FY2026 $0.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.2%FY2026 -75.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.9% +40.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.32BFY2026 $383.43MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +25.4%FY2026 +28.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +9.8% +15.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGEVHUBBAMSC
Held by institutions 79.1% 96.1% 73.7%
Institutions holding 3,414 1,014 277
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% -0.4% +6.4%
Institutions buying 1,950 511 173
Institutions selling 982 317 77
Buyers to sellers 1.99 1.61 2.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GEVHUBBAMSC
GEV 1.00 0.56 0.51
HUBB 0.56 1.00 0.41
AMSC 0.51 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GEV, HUBB and AMSC?

GE Vernova (GEV) is the largest by market capitalisation: GE Vernova (GEV) $235.60B, Hubbell (HUBB) $23.28B, American Superconductor (AMSC) $1.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, GEV, HUBB and AMSC?

GE Vernova (GEV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (GE Vernova (GEV) 24.7x, Hubbell (HUBB) 25.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hubbell (HUBB) is cheapest (Hubbell (HUBB) 22.9x, American Superconductor (AMSC) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

GE Vernova (GEV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: GE Vernova (GEV) +13.0%, Hubbell (HUBB) +10.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

GE Vernova (GEV) has the highest net margin (GE Vernova (GEV) 23.0%, Hubbell (HUBB) 14.5%). On return on invested capital, Hubbell (HUBB) leads (GE Vernova (GEV) 10.7%, Hubbell (HUBB) 12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GE Vernova (GEV) returned the most: GE Vernova (GEV) +46.4%, Hubbell (HUBB) +5.8%, American Superconductor (AMSC) -57.4%. Over five years, Hubbell (HUBB) compounded fastest (Hubbell (HUBB) +19.3%/yr, American Superconductor (AMSC) +8.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (GE Vernova (GEV) 53.8%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.2%, American Superconductor (AMSC) 85.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GEV, HUBB and AMSC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, GE Vernova (GEV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.