GEO vs ARMK vs CTAS Stock Comparison

Geo, Aramark and Cintas Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GEO Geo Group Inc
$27.57 -11.7% 1M +59.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.60B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
ARMK Aramark
$54.41 -1.0% 1M +36.1% 1Y
Market cap
$14.30B
P/E
37.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.85B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
CTAS Cintas Corp
$225.93 +13.0% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$89.41B
P/E
43.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, Geo 5, Aramark 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGEOARMKCTASLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.60B $14.30B $89.41B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.4x 37.3x 43.4x GEO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.6x 25.3x 38.6x GEO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.3% +11.0% +9.5% GEO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.3% 1.9% 17.8% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.5% 6.8% 28.2% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 4.1x 0.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% ARMK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.6% +36.1% +18.4% GEO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.2%/yr +8.5%/yr +16.4%/yr GEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.1% 26.6% 23.3% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 45/100 59/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

GEOARMKCTAS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGEOARMKCTAS
Valuation 53 #53 of 112 45 #62 of 112 19 #91 of 112
Growth 60 #39 of 96 84 #16 of 96 71 #29 of 96
Profitability 57 #40 of 91 47 #49 of 91 98 #3 of 91
Financial Health 34 #83 of 125 19 #101 of 125 70 #38 of 125
Shareholder Returns 74 #18 of 67 29 #48 of 67 39 #41 of 67
Overall 56 45 59
  • GEO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ARMK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGEOARMKCTASSPY
1 month -11.7%-1.0%+13.0% -0.8%
3 months -10.9%-6.0%+7.1% +3.5%
6 months +47.7%+19.3%+29.8% +7.0%
Year to date +71.0%+47.6%+20.1% +12.2%
1 year +59.6%+36.1%+18.4% +13.0%
3 years +213.3%+104.0%+82.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +46.4%+26.8%+22.1% +23.1%
5 years +259.9%+50.3%+113.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +29.2%+8.5%+16.4% +11.0%
10 years +71.1%+45.6%+747.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +5.5%+3.8%+23.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGEOARMKCTASSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.1%26.6%23.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.5%23.4%23.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.820.620.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.211.350.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.5%-46.4%-28.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.9%-12.8%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $32.78$62.39$225.93 $779.14
52-week low $13.26$36.04$163.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGEOARMKCTAS
P/E now vs peer median 12.4xmedian 21.9x 37.5xmedian 21.9x 43.9xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 0.9x 0.7xmedian 0.9x 7.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.2x 14.4xmedian 12.2x 28.8xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 138.0xmedian 14.3x 33.1xmedian 14.3x 44.4xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.3x 4.2xmedian 2.3x 17.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.48median 1.02 -3.20median 1.02 2.89median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGEOARMKCTAS
Revenue $2.83B $19.85B $11.56B
Gross profit – $1.69B $5.89B
Operating income $315.54M $870.70M $2.70B
Net income $291.54M $382.71M $2.06B
Free cash flow $26.44M $432.81M $2.03B
EPS (diluted) $2.21 $1.43 $5.10
Cash & equivalents $54.99M $499.43M $243.60M
Total debt $6.34B $6.13B $2.43B
Shares (diluted) 132.02M 268.54M 404.29M
Enterprise value $3.22B $12.24B $88.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGEOARMKCTAS
P/E 12.4x 37.5x 43.9x
P/FCF 138.0x 33.1x 44.4x
P/Operating cash flow 18.4x 15.7x 37.1x
P/S 1.3x 0.7x 7.8x
P/B 2.4x 4.2x 17.3x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 9.7x 18.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.2x 14.4x 28.8x
EV/EBIT 16.3x 22.9x 34.2x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 1.0x 8.0x
EV/FCF 194.2x 46.1x 45.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 25.8x 21.9x 38.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.48 -3.20 2.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGEOARMKCTAS
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.3% 11.0% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 13.3% 8.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 10.6% 11.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.2% 11.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.4% 9.8% 11.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 30.2% 13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 222.2% 5.8% 11.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -11.1% 14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 242.8% 4.6% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.6% -11.7% 15.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -16.6% 18.7% 14.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.1% 68.3% 14.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -79.8% 54.2% 19.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.6% 77.8% 17.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGEOARMKCTAS
Gross margin – 8.5% 51.0%
EBITDA margin 16.1% 7.0% 27.8%
Operating margin 11.2% 4.4% 23.4%
Pretax margin 14.0% 2.6% 22.5%
Net margin 10.3% 1.9% 17.8%
FCF margin 0.9% 2.2% 17.6%
Operating cash flow margin 7.0% 4.6% 21.1%
Return on equity 19.4% 11.5% 39.8%
Return on assets 7.7% 2.8% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 7.5% 6.8% 28.2%
Return on capital employed 9.3% 8.0% 34.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.4x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 2.4x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.3% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGEOARMKCTAS
Debt / assets 41.2% 43.9% 22.8%
Debt / equity 1.0x 1.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 4.1x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 58.3x 14.2x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 59.5% 75.7% 51.1%
Equity / assets 40.5% 24.3% 48.9%
Interest coverage 2.1x – 25.3x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.3x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.5x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.24 2.58 13.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGEOARMKCTAS
Dividend yield – 0.9% 0.8%
Net buyback yield 4.8% 0.3% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 4.8% 1.2% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 32.0% 35.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.3% 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 12.9% 14.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% 15.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGEOARMKCTAS
Forward P/E 20.6xFY2026 25.3xFY2026 38.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.34FY2026 $2.15FY2026 $5.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +55.8%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.8% +21.9% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.17BFY2026 $21.42BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.6%FY2026 +15.7%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.3% -4.6% +6.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGEOARMKCTAS
Held by institutions 94.2% 98.9% 67.6%
Institutions holding 292 544 1,428
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.2% +0.0% +6.4%
Institutions buying 151 320 656
Institutions selling 97 157 575
Buyers to sellers 1.56 2.04 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GEOARMKCTAS
GEO 1.00 0.27 0.05
ARMK 0.27 1.00 0.28
CTAS 0.05 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GEO, ARMK and CTAS?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Geo (GEO) $3.60B, Aramark (ARMK) $14.30B, Cintas (CTAS) $89.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, GEO, ARMK and CTAS?

Geo (GEO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Geo (GEO) 12.4x, Aramark (ARMK) 37.3x, Cintas (CTAS) 43.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Geo (GEO) is cheapest (Geo (GEO) 20.6x, Aramark (ARMK) 25.3x, Cintas (CTAS) 38.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Geo (GEO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Geo (GEO) +15.3%, Aramark (ARMK) +11.0%, Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Geo (GEO) 10.3%, Aramark (ARMK) 1.9%, Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Geo (GEO) 7.5%, Aramark (ARMK) 6.8%, Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Geo (GEO) returned the most: Geo (GEO) +59.6%, Aramark (ARMK) +36.1%, Cintas (CTAS) +18.4%. Over five years, Geo (GEO) compounded fastest (Geo (GEO) +29.2%/yr, Aramark (ARMK) +8.5%/yr, Cintas (CTAS) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Aramark (ARMK) has the highest dividend yield: Geo (GEO) 0.00%, Aramark (ARMK) 0.01%, Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%. Geo (GEO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Geo (GEO) 49.1%, Aramark (ARMK) 26.6%, Cintas (CTAS) 23.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GEO, ARMK and CTAS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.