GENI vs NTAP vs SRAD Stock Comparison

Genius Sports, NetApp and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GENI Genius Sports Ltd
$6.32 -1.6% 1M -47.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.20B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$790.23M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$227.58 +13.1% 1M +94.2% 1Y
Market cap
$44.61B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
0.91%
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
8 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.23 -7.6% 1M -54.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.81B
P/E
635.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 8, Genius Sports 2, Sportradar Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGENINTAPSRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.20B $44.61B $3.81B NTAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.9x 31.5x 635.9x NTAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.7x 47.0x NTAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +41.5% +12.2% +24.7% GENI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -23.0% 19.2% 1.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 36.7% -8.6% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -12.0x -0.5x 1.4x GENI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.91% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.4% +94.2% -54.9% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr +20.5%/yr -9.5%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.9% 44.8% 56.5% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 57/100 60/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

GENINTAPSRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGENINTAPSRAD
Valuation 47 #66 of 124 42 #65 of 112 79 #27 of 124
Growth 31 #78 of 113 52 #53 of 109 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 46 #59 of 109 92 #9 of 104 70 #33 of 109
Financial Health 16 #107 of 127 28 #84 of 116 56 #57 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 70 #25 of 81 31 #45 of 65
Overall 35 57 60
  • GENI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGENINTAPSRADSPY
1 month -1.6%+13.1%-7.6% -0.2%
3 months -13.5%+30.4%-17.5% +3.9%
6 months +46.3%+110.2%-1.0% +8.2%
Year to date -42.6%+112.5%-48.5% +12.9%
1 year -47.4%+94.2%-54.9% +12.3%
3 years +34.8%+216.9%+39.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +10.5%+46.9%+11.8% +23.3%
5 years -66.6%+153.7%-39.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%+20.5%-9.5% +10.9%
10 years —+573.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+21.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGENINTAPSRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.9%44.8%56.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.5%38.8%64.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.681.380.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.632.10-0.97 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.4%-43.5%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.4%-4.8%-54.9% -1.2%
52-week high $12.02$239.18$27.11 $779.14
52-week low $3.92$94.11$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGENINTAPSRAD
P/E now vs peer median -8.9xmedian 38.6x 31.5xmedian 33.2x 635.9xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 4.4x 6.0xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -72.9xmedian 34.5x 21.4xmedian 20.0x -13.9xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -64.3xmedian 29.4x 27.0xmedian 29.8x 7.5xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 3.3x 29.8xmedian 3.0x 4.3xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -1.42median 1.28 3.84median 1.17 21.97median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGENINTAPSRAD
Revenue $790.23M $7.39B $1.62B
Gross profit $216.86M $5.22B –
Operating income -$148.94M $1.85B –
Net income -$181.64M $1.42B $19.94M
Free cash flow -$49.83M $1.65B $510.26M
R&D $38.20M $1.02B $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $-0.71 $7.09 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $155.08M $1.57B $286.82M
Total debt $785.33M $2.49B $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 254.76M 200.00M 310.00
Enterprise value $2.36B $27.42B $2.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGENINTAPSRAD
P/E -8.9x 31.5x 635.9x
P/FCF -64.3x 27.0x 7.5x
P/Operating cash flow -103.0x 23.5x 7.6x
P/S 4.1x 6.0x 2.4x
P/B 4.7x 29.8x 4.3x
P/Tangible book -45.4x 30.6x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA -72.9x 21.4x -13.9x
EV/EBIT -25.7x 23.5x -41.3x
EV/Revenue 4.9x 5.9x 2.1x
EV/FCF -76.9x 26.4x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -123.3x 22.9x 6.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.42 3.84 21.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGENINTAPSRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 41.5% 12.2% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 29.0% 6.0% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 64.8% 13.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 71.2% 7.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -30.2% 35.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -11.0% 25.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) -133.3% 21.1% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.8% 5.5% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -93.2% 22.9% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 8.2% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -158.3% 3.2% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.0% 14.0% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -211.2% -0.5% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.2% 15.5% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGENINTAPSRAD
Gross margin 27.4% 70.6% –
EBITDA margin -6.7% 27.5% -15.4%
Operating margin -18.8% 25.0% –
Pretax margin -21.3% 24.7% 1.4%
Net margin -23.0% 19.2% 1.2%
FCF margin -6.3% 22.3% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin -3.9% 25.7% 31.0%
Return on equity -0.1% 99.6% 2.1%
Return on assets -11.0% 13.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – 36.7% -8.6%
Return on capital employed -13.6% 29.4% -3.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 1.3x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue 11.8% 5.4% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGENINTAPSRAD
Debt / assets 37.1% 22.7% 0.4%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -12.0x -0.5x 1.4x
Debt / FCF -15.8x 1.5x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 67.7% 86.4% 69.5%
Equity / assets 32.3% 13.6% 30.5%
Interest coverage – – -0.8x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 0.60 4.21 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGENINTAPSRAD
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – 1.7% -1.0%
Shareholder yield – 2.6% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGENINTAPSRAD
Forward P/E – 21.7xFY2026 47.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.31FY2026 $10.50FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +29.2%FY2026 -27.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +8.7% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.05BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.2%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.9% +8.6% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGENINTAPSRAD
Held by institutions 93.6% 97.4% 17.8%
Institutions holding 273 959 151
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.7% -1.0% -2.8%
Institutions buying 179 501 88
Institutions selling 70 336 42
Buyers to sellers 2.56 1.49 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GENINTAPSRAD
GENI 1.00 0.15 0.41
NTAP 0.15 1.00 0.08
SRAD 0.41 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GENI, NTAP and SRAD?

NetApp (NTAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Genius Sports (GENI) $3.20B, NetApp (NTAP) $44.61B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $3.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, GENI, NTAP and SRAD?

NetApp (NTAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Genius Sports (GENI) -8.9x, NetApp (NTAP) 31.5x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 635.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, NetApp (NTAP) is cheapest (NetApp (NTAP) 21.7x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 47.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Genius Sports (GENI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Genius Sports (GENI) +41.5%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Genius Sports (GENI) -23.0%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Genius Sports (GENI) -47.4%, NetApp (NTAP) +94.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -54.9%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Genius Sports (GENI) -19.7%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.5%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: NetApp (NTAP) 0.91%. Genius Sports (GENI) and Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Genius Sports (GENI) 74.9%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GENI, NTAP and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.