GEBRF vs MHO vs NVR Stock Comparison

Greenbriar Sustainable Living, M and Nvr Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MHO M/I Homes, Inc.
$126.14 -9.0% 1M -1.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.12B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.21B
Div. yield
–
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
NVR Nvr Inc
$5,806.02 -7.8% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$15.59B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

M leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (M 4, Nvr 2, Greenbriar Sustainable Living 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGEBRFMHONVRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.71M $3.12B $15.59B NVR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x 11.3x 14.9x MHO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.7x 15.8x MHO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -6.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +80.0% -1.8% -21.9% GEBRF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.6%/yr +16.9%/yr +3.5%/yr MHO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 388.7% 33.8% 28.1% NVR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 14/100 58/100 — MHO

Percentile Scorecard

GEBRFMHONVR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGEBRFMHONVR
Valuation 0 #21 of 21 60 #9 of 21 10 #19 of 21
Growth 42 #12 of 20 47 #11 of 20 –
Profitability – 35 #12 of 18 –
Financial Health – 82 #4 of 18 –
Shareholder Returns 0 #17 of 17 63 #7 of 17 –
Overall 14 58 –
  • GEBRF ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • MHO ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • NVR ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGEBRFMHONVRSPY
1 month -2.7%-9.0%-7.8% -0.2%
3 months -23.4%-17.2%-10.2% +3.9%
6 months +5.9%-6.7%-9.9% +8.2%
Year to date +200.0%-1.4%-20.4% +12.9%
1 year +80.0%-1.8%-21.9% +12.3%
3 years -55.0%+55.1%+7.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -23.4%+15.8%+2.6% +23.3%
5 years -68.4%+118.1%+18.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -20.6%+16.9%+3.5% +10.9%
10 years -52.0%+492.5%+282.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year -7.1%+19.5%+14.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGEBRFMHONVRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 388.7%33.8%28.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 717.0%32.1%28.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.570.760.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.21-0.05-0.78 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.3%-44.7%-43.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.0%-22.6%-28.3% -1.2%
52-week high $0.59$163.00$8,097.25 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$114.03$5,563.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGEBRFMHONVR
P/E now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 12.7x 11.6xmedian 12.7x 15.0xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.6x 0.8xmedian 0.6x 1.7xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.5x —median 9.5x —median 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -8.8xmedian 15.9x 23.0xmedian 15.9x 15.9xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 1.1x 4.5xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.16median 1.06 -0.81median 1.06 -1.94median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGEBRFMHONVR
Revenue – $4.21B –
Net income -$6.16M $277.42M –
Free cash flow -$1.66M $137.09M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.06 $10.69 $371.85
Cash & equivalents $410.30 $620.60M –
Total debt – $230.42M –
Shares (diluted) 38.64M 25.95M 2.82M
Enterprise value $6.72M $310.04M $15.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGEBRFMHONVR
P/E -6.0x 11.6x 15.0x
P/FCF -8.8x 23.0x 15.9x
P/Operating cash flow -8.8x 21.0x –
P/S – 0.8x 1.7x
P/B 6.1x 1.0x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 6.1x 1.0x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue – 0.7x –
EV/FCF -7.5x 20.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow -7.5x 18.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.16 -0.81 -1.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGEBRFMHONVR
Revenue growth (1Y) – -6.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -62.9% -41.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.5% -17.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 44.7% -38.5% -20.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -37.9% -14.3% -7.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -265.2% -39.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% -40.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -265.2% -43.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% -41.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGEBRFMHONVR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – 6.6% –
FCF margin – 3.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 3.6% –
Return on equity -86.2% – –
Return on assets -14.8% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGEBRFMHONVR
Debt / assets – 4.7% –
Debt / equity – 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 1.7x –
Liabilities / assets 84.9% 33.1% 38.3%
Equity / assets 15.1% 66.9% 61.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.2x – –
Quick ratio 0.2x – –
Cash ratio 0.2x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGEBRFMHONVR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -4.1% 6.1% –
Shareholder yield -4.1% 6.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGEBRFMHONVR
Forward P/E – 10.7xFY2026 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $11.78FY2026 $366.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -28.1%FY2026 -16.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.4% +3.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.07BFY2026 $9.90BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -7.9%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.7% -6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGEBRFMHONVR
Held by institutions – 96.2% 88.3%
Institutions holding – 353 683
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% +3.2%
Institutions buying – 190 328
Institutions selling – 120 237
Buyers to sellers – 1.58 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GEBRFMHONVR
GEBRF 1.00 -0.02 0.00
MHO -0.02 1.00 0.69
NVR 0.00 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GEBRF, MHO and NVR?

Nvr (NVR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) $14.71M, M (MHO) $3.12B, Nvr (NVR) $15.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, GEBRF, MHO and NVR?

M (MHO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) -6.0x, M (MHO) 11.3x, Nvr (NVR) 14.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, M (MHO) is cheapest (M (MHO) 10.7x, Nvr (NVR) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) returned the most: Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) +80.0%, M (MHO) -1.8%, Nvr (NVR) -21.9%. Over five years, M (MHO) compounded fastest (Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) -20.6%/yr, M (MHO) +16.9%/yr, Nvr (NVR) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nvr (NVR) has been the steadiest (Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) 388.7%, M (MHO) 33.8%, Nvr (NVR) 28.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GEBRF, MHO and NVR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, M (MHO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.