FXHO vs TTMI vs OWLT Stock Comparison

UTime, Ttm Technologies and Owlet Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FXHO UTime Ltd
$7.12 -28.6% 1M -97.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.05M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$86.78 -32.8% 1M +47.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.14B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
6 wins
OWLT Owlet, Inc.
$4.20 -16.7% 1M -54.8% 1Y
Market cap
$121.02M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$114.86M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 6, Owlet 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFXHOTTMIOWLTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.05M $9.14B $121.02M TTMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.1x 38.2x -9.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +27.6% +28.2% OWLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.0% -11.2% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x 2.8x TTMI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.4% +47.3% -54.8% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -93.5%/yr +46.2%/yr -39.2%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 217.0% 90.4% 85.7% OWLT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 60/100 32/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

FXHOTTMIOWLT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFXHOTTMIOWLT
Valuation 51 #21 of 42 52 #54 of 112 2 #41 of 42
Growth – 88 #14 of 109 100 #1 of 42
Profitability – 61 #41 of 104 18 #33 of 40
Financial Health 54 #21 of 44 37 #74 of 116 42 #26 of 44
Shareholder Returns – – 0 #28 of 28
Overall – 60 32
  • FXHO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • TTMI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • OWLT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFXHOTTMIOWLTSPY
1 month -28.6%-32.8%-16.7% -0.2%
3 months -30.9%-20.2%-18.9% +3.9%
6 months -64.9%-36.9%-17.3% +8.2%
Year to date -86.0%+25.8%-74.1% +12.9%
1 year -97.4%+47.3%-54.8% +12.3%
3 years -100.0%+653.3%+3.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -97.3%+96.1%+1.2% +23.3%
5 years -100.0%+566.0%-91.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -93.5%+46.2%-39.2% +10.9%
10 years —+536.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+20.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFXHOTTMIOWLTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 217.0%90.4%85.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 185.8%97.7%94.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.523.812.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.450.52-0.64 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-66.6%-96.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.5%-60.8%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $280.00$221.47$16.52 $779.14
52-week low $5.27$58.45$4.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFXHOTTMIOWLT
P/E now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 16.0x 38.2xmedian 33.2x -9.4xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.6x 2.7xmedian 2.8x 1.1xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x 19.6xmedian 20.0x -21.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 11.9x -603.8xmedian 29.8x -14.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.2x 4.7xmedian 3.0x 5.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.81median 1.17 -0.15median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFXHOTTMIOWLT
Revenue – $3.38B $114.86M
Gross profit – $715.64M $62.89M
Operating income – $334.16M -$7.23M
Net income – $236.78M -$8.82M
Free cash flow – -$15.14M -$8.53M
R&D – $29.71M $15.87M
EPS (diluted) – $2.20 $-0.45
Cash & equivalents $37.92M $507.91M $30.95M
Total debt $9.87M $3.72B –
Shares (diluted) 56.30K 107.58M 28.77M
Enterprise value -$97.87M $7.23B -$4.61M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFXHOTTMIOWLT
P/E -0.1x 38.2x -9.4x
P/FCF -0.6x -603.8x -14.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 28.3x -15.6x
P/S 0.4x 2.7x 1.1x
P/B 0.6x 4.7x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 5.1x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – 19.6x -21.7x
EV/EBIT – 28.8x -14.8x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 0.9x
EV/FCF – -634.6x -12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 29.8x -13.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.81 -0.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFXHOTTMIOWLT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 27.6% 28.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.3% 29.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 33.6% 33.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 53.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 94.3% 56.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 47.1% 50.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 154.1% 81.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 48.5% 47.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 147.7% 85.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 47.2% 60.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 35.5% 38.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 43.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -185.8% 33.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 41.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFXHOTTMIOWLT
Gross margin – 21.2% 54.8%
EBITDA margin – 14.5% -4.3%
Operating margin – 9.9% -6.3%
Pretax margin – 7.8% -7.7%
Net margin – 7.0% -11.2%
FCF margin – -0.4% -7.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% -6.8%
Return on equity – 12.6% -39.9%
Return on assets – 5.6% -9.8%
Return on invested capital – 10.6% –
Return on capital employed – 11.4% -19.9%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.8% 11.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFXHOTTMIOWLT
Debt / assets 15.3% 22.0% 18.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – -64.3x -2.0x
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 56.2% 75.3%
Equity / assets 32.0% 43.8% 24.7%
Interest coverage – 7.6x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 3.86 -2.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFXHOTTMIOWLT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -30.9%
Shareholder yield – – -30.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFXHOTTMIOWLT
Forward P/E – 16.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.29FY2026 $-0.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +115.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +53.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.26BFY2026 $115.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +46.4%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +60.2% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFXHOTTMIOWLT
Held by institutions – 92.4% 59.2%
Institutions holding – 638 58
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.6% -3.4%
Institutions buying – 396 31
Institutions selling – 202 14
Buyers to sellers – 1.96 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FXHOTTMIOWLT
FXHO 1.00 0.15 0.13
TTMI 0.15 1.00 0.28
OWLT 0.13 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FXHO, TTMI and OWLT?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: UTime (FXHO) $12.05M, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.14B, Owlet (OWLT) $121.02M.

Which company is growing faster?

Owlet (OWLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Owlet (OWLT) +28.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Owlet (OWLT) -11.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: UTime (FXHO) -97.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.3%, Owlet (OWLT) -54.8%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (UTime (FXHO) -93.5%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +46.2%/yr, Owlet (OWLT) -39.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Owlet (OWLT) has been the steadiest (UTime (FXHO) 217.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.4%, Owlet (OWLT) 85.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FXHO, TTMI and OWLT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.