FXHO vs SONO vs CRCT Stock Comparison

UTime, Sonos and Cricut Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FXHO UTime Ltd
$7.12 -28.6% 1M -97.4% 1Y
Market cap
$383.14K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
SONO Sonos Inc
$17.87 -1.7% 1M +1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.10B
P/E
36.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.49B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
CRCT Cricut, Inc.
$6.15 +0.2% 1M +15.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.27B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$689.79M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Cricut leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cricut 5, Sonos 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFXHOSONOCRCTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $383.14K $2.10B $1.27B SONO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.1x 36.9x 14.5x CRCT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 29.3x 17.1x CRCT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +5.6% -3.1% SONO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 3.8% 12.7% CRCT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.4% +1.4% +15.8% CRCT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -93.5%/yr -11.0%/yr -26.0%/yr SONO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 217.0% 47.4% 41.9% CRCT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 73/100 72/100 SONO

Percentile Scorecard

FXHOSONOCRCT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFXHOSONOCRCT
Valuation 51 #21 of 42 37 #27 of 42 66 #15 of 42
Growth – 95 #3 of 42 34 #28 of 42
Profitability – 87 #6 of 40 100 #1 of 40
Financial Health 54 #21 of 44 63 #17 of 44 91 #5 of 44
Shareholder Returns – 85 #5 of 28 70 #9 of 28
Overall – 73 72
  • FXHO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • SONO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • CRCT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFXHOSONOCRCTSPY
1 month -28.6%-1.7%+0.2% -0.2%
3 months -30.9%+6.4%+30.9% +3.9%
6 months -64.9%+23.4%+40.1% +8.2%
Year to date -86.0%+1.8%+24.2% +12.9%
1 year -97.4%+1.4%+15.8% +12.3%
3 years -100.0%+81.2%-25.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -97.3%+21.9%-9.4% +23.3%
5 years -100.0%-44.2%-77.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -93.5%-11.0%-26.0% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureFXHOSONOCRCTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 217.0%47.4%41.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 185.8%50.1%41.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.520.990.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.450.030.38 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-78.0%-87.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.5%-6.7%-8.2% -1.2%
52-week high $280.00$19.16$6.70 $779.14
52-week low $5.27$12.70$3.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFXHOSONOCRCT
P/E now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 16.0x 37.4xmedian 16.0x 14.7xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.6x 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.9xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x 15.9xmedian 9.8x 7.6xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 11.9x 16.9xmedian 11.9x 8.7xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 1.2x 3.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.74median 0.64 0.62median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFXHOSONOCRCT
Revenue – $1.49B $689.79M
Gross profit – $693.21M $399.65M
Operating income – $65.97M $106.89M
Net income – $56.91M $87.68M
Free cash flow – $125.15M $147.65M
R&D – $253.73M $67.56M
EPS (diluted) – $0.47 $0.42
Cash & equivalents $37.92M $206.89M $266.91M
Total debt $9.87M – –
Shares (diluted) 56.30K 120.98M 211.06M
Enterprise value -$108.79M $999.76M $245.30M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFXHOSONOCRCT
P/E -0.1x 37.4x 14.7x
P/FCF -0.6x 16.9x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 14.4x 7.1x
P/S 0.4x 1.4x 1.9x
P/B 0.6x 5.2x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 6.2x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA – 15.9x 7.6x
EV/EBIT – 28.1x 9.4x
EV/Revenue – 1.2x 1.5x
EV/FCF – 14.8x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.6x 5.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.74 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFXHOSONOCRCT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 5.6% -3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -3.7% -5.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.1% 7.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% 6.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 177.2% 27.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 48.3% 22.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – 174.5% 22.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 49.2% 21.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 174.2% 24.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 50.4% 23.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 52.9% -33.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 97.7% -12.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 119.5% -41.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 50.9% -14.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFXHOSONOCRCT
Gross margin – 46.5% 57.9%
EBITDA margin – 7.8% 19.0%
Operating margin – 4.4% 15.5%
Pretax margin – 4.8% 16.9%
Net margin – 3.8% 12.7%
FCF margin – 8.4% 21.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.9% 26.1%
Return on equity – 14.4% 24.1%
Return on assets – 6.6% 15.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 13.4% 29.4%
Asset turnover – 1.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.6x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 4.2% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFXHOSONOCRCT
Debt / assets 15.3% – –
Debt / equity 0.5x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 54.3% 37.1%
Equity / assets 32.0% 45.7% 62.9%
Interest coverage – 143.7x 188.5x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.6x 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.0x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.7x 1.4x
Altman Z-score – 4.87 6.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFXHOSONOCRCT
Dividend yield – – 3.3%
Net buyback yield – 4.3% 2.2%
Shareholder yield – 4.3% 5.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFXHOSONOCRCT
Forward P/E – 29.3xFY2026 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.61FY2026 $0.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +2.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -59.0% -30.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.57BFY2026 $663.76MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +9.1%FY2026 -6.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +8.2% +11.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFXHOSONOCRCT
Held by institutions – 100.0% 54.8%
Institutions holding – 306 153
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.8% +5.1%
Institutions buying – 151 86
Institutions selling – 105 43
Buyers to sellers – 1.44 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FXHOSONOCRCT
FXHO 1.00 -0.19 -0.11
SONO -0.19 1.00 0.21
CRCT -0.11 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FXHO, SONO and CRCT?

Sonos (SONO) is the largest by market capitalisation: UTime (FXHO) $383.14K, Sonos (SONO) $2.10B, Cricut (CRCT) $1.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, FXHO, SONO and CRCT?

Cricut (CRCT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (UTime (FXHO) -0.1x, Sonos (SONO) 36.9x, Cricut (CRCT) 14.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cricut (CRCT) is cheapest (Sonos (SONO) 29.3x, Cricut (CRCT) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sonos (SONO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sonos (SONO) +5.6%, Cricut (CRCT) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cricut (CRCT) has the highest net margin (Sonos (SONO) 3.8%, Cricut (CRCT) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cricut (CRCT) returned the most: UTime (FXHO) -97.4%, Sonos (SONO) +1.4%, Cricut (CRCT) +15.8%. Over five years, Sonos (SONO) compounded fastest (UTime (FXHO) -93.5%/yr, Sonos (SONO) -11.0%/yr, Cricut (CRCT) -26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cricut (CRCT) has been the steadiest (UTime (FXHO) 217.0%, Sonos (SONO) 47.4%, Cricut (CRCT) 41.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FXHO, SONO and CRCT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cricut (CRCT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.