FXHO vs HELE vs OWLT Stock Comparison

UTime, Helen Of Troy and Owlet Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FXHO UTime Ltd
$6.22 -37.6% 1M -98.1% 1Y
Market cap
$10.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
HELE Helen Of Troy Ltd
$28.52 -0.4% 1M +39.7% 1Y
Market cap
$664.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.83B
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
OWLT Owlet, Inc.
$4.04 -19.8% 1M -56.6% 1Y
Market cap
$116.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$114.86M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Helen Of Troy leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Helen Of Troy 6, Owlet 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFXHOHELEOWLTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.53M $664.44M $116.41M HELE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.1x -6.7x -9.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.6x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.3% +28.2% OWLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -5.4% -11.2% HELE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 8.3x 2.8x OWLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -98.1% +39.7% -56.6% HELE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -93.7%/yr -33.6%/yr -39.8%/yr HELE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 216.9% 54.0% 85.8% HELE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 43/100 32/100 HELE

Percentile Scorecard

FXHOHELEOWLT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFXHOHELEOWLT
Valuation 51 #21 of 42 81 #9 of 42 2 #41 of 42
Growth – 39 #26 of 42 100 #1 of 42
Profitability – 49 #21 of 40 18 #33 of 40
Financial Health 52 #21 of 43 29 #31 of 43 41 #26 of 43
Shareholder Returns – 19 #23 of 28 0 #28 of 28
Overall – 43 32
  • FXHO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • HELE ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • OWLT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFXHOHELEOWLTSPY
1 month -37.6%-0.4%-19.8% -0.8%
3 months -47.2%+0.9%-22.8% +3.5%
6 months -70.4%+21.9%-22.2% +7.0%
Year to date -87.8%+34.2%-75.0% +12.2%
1 year -98.1%+39.7%-56.6% +13.0%
3 years -100.0%-70.5%-0.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -97.4%-33.4%-0.1% +23.1%
5 years -100.0%-87.1%-92.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -93.7%-33.6%-39.8% +11.0%
10 years —-64.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-9.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFXHOHELEOWLTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 216.9%54.0%85.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 185.8%48.3%94.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.470.972.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.450.74-0.66 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-94.5%-96.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.8%-5.6%-75.5% -1.8%
52-week high $280.00$30.22$16.52 $779.14
52-week low $5.27$13.88$4.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFXHOHELEOWLT
P/E now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 16.1x -6.7xmedian 16.1x -9.1xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.1x 16.8xmedian 12.1x -20.8xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 11.9x 4.5xmedian 11.9x -13.7xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x 5.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.17median 0.64 -0.15median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFXHOHELEOWLT
Revenue – $1.83B $114.86M
Gross profit – $864.98M $62.89M
Operating income – $23.94M -$7.23M
Net income – -$99.23M -$8.82M
Free cash flow – $147.21M -$8.53M
R&D – – $15.87M
EPS (diluted) – $-4.11 $-0.45
Cash & equivalents $37.92M $22.58M $30.95M
Total debt $9.87M $3.17B –
Shares (diluted) 56.30K 24.15M 28.77M
Enterprise value -$99.40M $574.15M -$9.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFXHOHELEOWLT
P/E -0.1x -6.7x -9.1x
P/FCF -0.5x 4.5x -13.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.7x -15.0x
P/S 0.4x 0.4x 1.0x
P/B 0.5x 0.8x 5.0x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 1.4x 5.5x
EV/EBITDA – 16.8x -20.8x
EV/EBIT – 54.9x -14.2x
EV/Revenue – 0.7x 0.9x
EV/FCF – 8.9x -12.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.3x -13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.17 -0.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFXHOHELEOWLT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.3% 28.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -3.1% 29.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 0.5% 33.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.7% 53.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 103.7% 56.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -52.1% 50.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 84.9% 81.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -39.6% 47.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 85.7% 85.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -39.5% 60.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 97.1% 38.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -25.9% 43.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 192.7% 33.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -25.7% 41.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFXHOHELEOWLT
Gross margin – 47.4% 54.8%
EBITDA margin – 4.3% -4.3%
Operating margin – 1.3% -6.3%
Pretax margin – -1.5% -7.7%
Net margin – -5.4% -11.2%
FCF margin – 8.1% -7.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.8% -6.8%
Return on equity – -11.7% -39.9%
Return on assets – -4.8% -9.8%
Return on invested capital – 1.6% –
Return on capital employed – 1.5% -19.9%
Asset turnover – 0.9x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.8x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 11.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFXHOHELEOWLT
Debt / assets 15.3% 32.1% 18.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.8x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 8.3x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x -2.0x
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 59.3% 75.3%
Equity / assets 32.0% 40.7% 24.7%
Interest coverage – 0.5x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.7x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.0x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 1.73 -2.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFXHOHELEOWLT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% -32.1%
Shareholder yield – -0.1% -32.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFXHOHELEOWLT
Forward P/E – 7.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.74FY2026 $-0.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +13.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.76BFY2026 $115.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -1.8%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.6% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFXHOHELEOWLT
Held by institutions – 96.3% 59.2%
Institutions holding – 198 58
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.7% -3.4%
Institutions buying – 120 31
Institutions selling – 46 14
Buyers to sellers – 2.61 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FXHOHELEOWLT
FXHO 1.00 -0.05 0.13
HELE -0.05 1.00 0.08
OWLT 0.13 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FXHO, HELE and OWLT?

Helen Of Troy (HELE) is the largest by market capitalisation: UTime (FXHO) $10.53M, Helen Of Troy (HELE) $664.44M, Owlet (OWLT) $116.41M.

Which company is growing faster?

Owlet (OWLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Helen Of Troy (HELE) +0.3%, Owlet (OWLT) +28.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Helen Of Troy (HELE) has the highest net margin (Helen Of Troy (HELE) -5.4%, Owlet (OWLT) -11.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Helen Of Troy (HELE) returned the most: UTime (FXHO) -98.1%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) +39.7%, Owlet (OWLT) -56.6%. Over five years, Helen Of Troy (HELE) compounded fastest (UTime (FXHO) -93.7%/yr, Helen Of Troy (HELE) -33.6%/yr, Owlet (OWLT) -39.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Helen Of Troy (HELE) has been the steadiest (UTime (FXHO) 216.9%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) 54.0%, Owlet (OWLT) 85.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FXHO, HELE and OWLT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Helen Of Troy (HELE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.