FWRD vs GXO vs R Stock Comparison

Forward Air, GXO Logistics and Ryder System Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FWRD Forward Air Corp
$17.87 +19.1% 1M -7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$568.58M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.52B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc.
$49.91 +11.5% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$5.75B
P/E
43.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.64B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
3 wins
R Ryder System Inc
$280.60 +21.5% 1M +64.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.73B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
0.01%
Logistics Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 7, GXO Logistics 3, Forward Air 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFWRDGXORLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $568.58M $5.75B $10.73B R
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.0x 43.9x 20.6x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.1x 19.4x GXO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.1% +7.6% +3.2% GXO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.4% 1.0% 4.0% R
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -9.8% 3.3% -70.6% GXO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -115.3x 3.1x -0.9x FWRD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.1% -7.6% +64.3% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -29.2%/yr -10.9%/yr +27.0%/yr R
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.5% 40.7% 32.2% R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 36/100 41/100 R

Percentile Scorecard

FWRDGXOR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFWRDGXOR
Valuation 32 #93 of 136 38 #85 of 136 36 #88 of 136
Growth 19 #98 of 121 75 #31 of 121 63 #46 of 121
Profitability 18 #92 of 112 29 #80 of 112 28 #81 of 112
Financial Health 12 #123 of 140 20 #112 of 140 5 #133 of 140
Shareholder Returns – 20 #64 of 80 72 #23 of 80
Overall 20 36 41
  • FWRD ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFWRDGXORSPY
1 month +19.1%+11.5%+21.5% +0.7%
3 months +25.9%-1.1%+8.8% +3.7%
6 months -15.1%-12.6%+10.6% +7.1%
Year to date -28.5%-5.2%+46.6% +12.8%
1 year -7.1%-7.6%+64.3% +11.9%
3 years -74.8%-1.1%+195.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -36.9%-0.4%+43.5% +22.8%
5 years -82.2%-43.8%+230.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year -29.2%-10.9%+27.0% +10.9%
10 years -56.0%—+307.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year -7.9%—+15.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFWRDGXORSPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.5%40.7%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 114.8%44.3%29.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.501.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.08-0.192.00 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.3%-69.6%-28.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.9%-23.9%-0.5% -1.2%
52-week high $30.23$65.59$282.13 $779.14
52-week low $8.31$44.15$162.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFWRDGXOR
P/E now vs peer median -2.0xmedian 16.5x 43.8xmedian 16.5x 20.6xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -160.0xmedian 8.8x 10.2xmedian 8.8x -2.2xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 11.9x 31.8xmedian 11.9x 11.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median -4.9xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x 3.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.84 -3.62median 0.84 2.48median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFWRDGXOR
Revenue $2.52B $13.64B $13.08B
Gross profit – $2.08B $2.56B
Operating income -$168.73M $328.00M -$9.81B
Net income -$330.71M $139.00M $520.00M
Free cash flow $48.22M $180.00M $954.00M
EPS (diluted) $-8.81 $1.13 $13.41
Cash & equivalents $139.45M $769.00M $198.00M
Total debt $1.69B $3.20B $30.21B
Shares (diluted) 32.48M 115.72M 38.79M
Enterprise value $41.76M $3.00B $9.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFWRDGXOR
P/E -2.0x 43.8x 20.6x
P/FCF 12.5x 31.8x 11.2x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 11.3x 3.9x
P/S 0.2x 0.4x 0.8x
P/B -4.9x 1.9x 3.6x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 2.6x 4.1x
EV/EBITDA -160.0x 10.2x -2.2x
EV/EBIT -12.8x 24.9x -1.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.6x 1.4x
EV/FCF 44.7x 45.3x 18.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.4x 16.0x 6.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 -3.62 2.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFWRDGXOR
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.1% 7.6% 3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.1% 12.9% 3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.3% -0.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% 3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -237.4% 52.6% -4.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -42.5% 4.6% -3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -72.8% 107.5% 3.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -61.1% -11.7% 2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -54.9% 106.7% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -52.0% -12.1% 8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 67.4% 22.4% 13.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.7% 4.8% 4.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 503.2% 93.5% 1,184%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.4% 20.1% 47.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFWRDGXOR
Gross margin – 15.3% 19.6%
EBITDA margin -0.5% 5.9% -61.9%
Operating margin -6.7% 2.4% -75.0%
Pretax margin -13.9% 1.6% 5.4%
Net margin -11.4% 1.0% 4.0%
FCF margin 1.9% 1.3% 7.3%
Operating cash flow margin 2.8% 3.7% 20.9%
Return on equity – 4.5% 17.8%
Return on assets -13.6% 1.1% 3.2%
Return on invested capital -9.8% 3.3% -70.6%
Return on capital employed -8.0% 4.0% -80.1%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 3.7x 5.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFWRDGXOR
Debt / assets 70.2% 25.9% 44.6%
Debt / equity -13.8x 1.1x 2.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -115.3x 3.1x -0.9x
Debt / FCF 35.1x 17.8x 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 105.1% 75.6% 81.6%
Equity / assets -5.1% 24.4% 18.4%
Interest coverage -1.0x 2.5x -25.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.8x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.63 1.56 -0.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFWRDGXOR
Dividend yield – – 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.2% 5.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.2% 6.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 28.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 15.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFWRDGXOR
Forward P/E – 16.1xFY2026 19.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.86FY2026 $3.10FY2026 $14.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.5%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.0% +30.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.49BFY2026 $13.03BFY2026 $14.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.3%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.5% +17.6% +2.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFWRDGXOR
Held by institutions 90.3% 100.0% 90.8%
Institutions holding 189 480 580
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +5.8% -0.6%
Institutions buying 118 237 309
Institutions selling 45 153 177
Buyers to sellers 2.62 1.55 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FWRDGXOR
FWRD 1.00 0.38 0.36
GXO 0.38 1.00 0.55
R 0.36 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FWRD, GXO and R?

Ryder System (R) is the largest by market capitalisation: Forward Air (FWRD) $568.58M, GXO Logistics (GXO) $5.75B, Ryder System (R) $10.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, FWRD, GXO and R?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Forward Air (FWRD) -2.0x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 43.9x, Ryder System (R) 20.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, GXO Logistics (GXO) is cheapest (GXO Logistics (GXO) 16.1x, Ryder System (R) 19.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

GXO Logistics (GXO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Forward Air (FWRD) -0.1%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +7.6%, Ryder System (R) +3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ryder System (R) has the highest net margin (Forward Air (FWRD) -11.4%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 1.0%, Ryder System (R) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, GXO Logistics (GXO) leads (Forward Air (FWRD) -9.8%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 3.3%, Ryder System (R) -70.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Forward Air (FWRD) -7.1%, GXO Logistics (GXO) -7.6%, Ryder System (R) +64.3%. Over five years, Ryder System (R) compounded fastest (Forward Air (FWRD) -29.2%/yr, GXO Logistics (GXO) -10.9%/yr, Ryder System (R) +27.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Forward Air (FWRD) 0.00%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 0.00%, Ryder System (R) 0.01%. Forward Air (FWRD) and GXO Logistics (GXO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (Forward Air (FWRD) 93.5%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 40.7%, Ryder System (R) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FWRD, GXO and R?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.