FUTU vs CBSH vs LPLA Stock Comparison

Futu Holdings, Commerce Bancshares and LPL Financial Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FUTU Futu Holdings Ltd
$101.34 -9.4% 1M -43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.25B
P/E
10.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.32B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Futu Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Futu Holdings 6, Commerce Bancshares 3, LPL Financial Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFUTUCBSHLPLALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.25B $15.97B $25.37B LPLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.1x 27.4x 25.2x FUTU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.8x 12.3x 14.1x FUTU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +44.6% +8.6% +38.8% FUTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 42.7% 31.3% 5.1% FUTU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.9% 20.2% 10.1% FUTU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.0x 2.5x CBSH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.2% +10.2% -6.8% CBSH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.6%/yr -0.4%/yr +13.0%/yr LPLA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.5% 18.5% 37.0% CBSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 65/100 35/100 FUTU

Percentile Scorecard

FUTUCBSHLPLA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFUTUCBSHLPLA
Valuation 78 #22 of 97 3 #352 of 362 44 #55 of 97
Growth 87 #10 of 68 66 #76 of 221 18 #56 of 68
Profitability 99 #2 of 67 96 #10 of 200 50 #34 of 67
Financial Health 56 #43 of 97 97 #8 of 203 37 #62 of 97
Shareholder Returns 87 #6 of 40 64 #125 of 342 28 #29 of 40
Overall 81 65 35
  • FUTU ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • CBSH ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • LPLA ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFUTUCBSHLPLASPY
1 month -9.4%-1.1%+0.9% -0.8%
3 months -2.8%-5.4%-4.4% +3.5%
6 months -36.7%+9.4%-4.0% +7.0%
Year to date -38.3%+6.6%-11.2% +12.2%
1 year -43.2%+10.2%-6.8% +13.0%
3 years +76.7%+48.0%+43.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.9%+14.0%+12.7% +23.1%
5 years +51.2%-2.2%+84.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +8.6%-0.4%+13.0% +11.0%
10 years —+49.7%+894.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+4.1%+25.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFUTUCBSHLPLASPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.5%18.5%37.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.7%19.4%40.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.970.220.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.690.55-0.18 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.6%-42.1%-33.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.1%-7.5%-19.3% -1.8%
52-week high $199.04$60.33$393.25 $779.14
52-week low $89.76$47.49$265.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFUTUCBSHLPLA
P/E now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 29.4x 27.6xmedian 12.1x 25.1xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.9x 8.6xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.7x 13.3xmedian 5.0x 12.5xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.0x 13.3xmedian 11.0x -26.8xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 2.3x 3.7xmedian 1.2x 4.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.52 5.53median 1.36 -4.36median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFUTUCBSHLPLA
Revenue $3.32B $1.86B $19.61B
Gross profit $2.90B – –
Operating income $2.05B – –
Net income $1.42B $590.84M $1.01B
Free cash flow – $1.21B -$931.29M
R&D $263.86M – –
EPS (diluted) $10.02 $4.04 $12.58
Cash & equivalents $2.34B – $1.28B
Total debt $2.01B $26.29M $7.46B
Shares (diluted) 141.36M 144.31M 80.03M
Enterprise value $3.94B $15.76B $20.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFUTUCBSHLPLA
P/E 10.0x 27.6x 25.1x
P/FCF – 13.3x -26.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.8x -99.1x
P/S 4.3x 8.6x 1.3x
P/B 2.9x 3.7x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 3.8x 10.8x
EV/EBITDA – 13.3x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 6.3x 14.2x 17.5x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 8.6x 1.6x
EV/FCF – 13.2x -33.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.7x -123.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 5.53 -4.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFUTUCBSHLPLA
Revenue growth (1Y) 44.6% 8.6% 38.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 41.3% 6.1% 27.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 50.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 41.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 60.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 50.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 39.8% 5.0% -9.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.3% 5.0% -5.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.5% 0.9% -9.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 41.1% 5.0% -5.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 131.6% -144.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 36.7% -28.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 145.2% -17,226%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 44.0% -36.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFUTUCBSHLPLA
Gross margin 87.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 64.6% 12.7%
Operating margin 62.0% – –
Pretax margin 52.3% 40.7% 7.0%
Net margin 42.7% 31.3% 5.1%
FCF margin – 65.1% -4.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 67.7% -1.3%
Return on equity 27.7% 13.6% 17.6%
Return on assets 4.1% 1.7% 5.2%
Return on invested capital 28.9% 20.2% 10.1%
Return on capital employed 96.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFUTUCBSHLPLA
Debt / assets 5.4% 0.1% 37.7%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.0x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.0x 2.5x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x -8.0x
Liabilities / assets 86.7% 87.6% 70.9%
Equity / assets 13.3% 12.4% 29.1%
Interest coverage 8.7x 3.0x 4.3x
Current ratio 1.1x – –
Quick ratio 0.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score 0.80 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFUTUCBSHLPLA
Dividend yield 2.6% 2.0% 0.4%
Net buyback yield – 2.1% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 4.1% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFUTUCBSHLPLA
Forward P/E 9.8xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 14.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.31FY2026 $4.53FY2026 $22.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +29.1% -3.3% +30.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.02BFY2026 $2.10BFY2026 $20.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.0%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.0% -4.6% +24.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFUTUCBSHLPLA
Held by institutions 31.9% 37.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 319 507 765
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% +4.8% +0.7%
Institutions buying 157 266 351
Institutions selling 124 144 301
Buyers to sellers 1.27 1.85 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FUTUCBSHLPLA
FUTU 1.00 0.00 0.23
CBSH 0.00 1.00 0.36
LPLA 0.23 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FUTU, CBSH and LPLA?

LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Futu Holdings (FUTU) $14.25B, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) $15.97B, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) $25.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, FUTU, CBSH and LPLA?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 10.1x, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 27.4x, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 25.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Futu Holdings (FUTU) is cheapest (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.8x, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 12.3x, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 14.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Futu Holdings (FUTU) +44.6%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) +8.6%, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +38.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) has the highest net margin (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 42.7%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 31.3%, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 5.1%). On return on invested capital, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 28.9%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 20.2%, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) returned the most: Futu Holdings (FUTU) -43.2%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) +10.2%, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) -6.8%. Over five years, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) compounded fastest (Futu Holdings (FUTU) +8.6%/yr, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) -0.4%/yr, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) has been the steadiest (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 62.5%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 18.5%, LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 37.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FUTU, CBSH and LPLA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.