FTV vs KRNT vs SVMB Stock Comparison

Fortive, Kornit Digital and Jingbo Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FTV Fortive Corp
$61.62 +9.8% 1M +24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$19.54B
P/E
36.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
7 wins
KRNT Kornit Digital Ltd.
$18.20 +17.0% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$825.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$215.85M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
SVMB Jingbo Technology, Inc.
$2.66 +166.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.48B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.24M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fortive leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fortive 7, Jingbo Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTVKRNTSVMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.54B $825.26M $1.48B FTV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.6x -40.6x -245.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.3x 91.0x — FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.6% +4.0% -45.7% FTV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.4% -9.4% -486.2% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x — -4.6x SVMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.6% +19.9% +26.7% SVMB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.8%/yr -35.7%/yr — FTV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.7% 43.8% 129.3% FTV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 44/100 10/100 FTV

Percentile Scorecard

FTVKRNTSVMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTVKRNTSVMB
Valuation 45 #112 of 203 47 #108 of 203 16 #85 of 101
Growth 19 #153 of 188 41 #112 of 188 5 #92 of 97
Profitability 73 #50 of 183 23 #142 of 183 2 #92 of 94
Financial Health 39 #133 of 217 99 #3 of 217 15 #92 of 108
Shareholder Returns 61 #61 of 153 11 #137 of 153 –
Overall 47 44 10
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KRNT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SVMB ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTVKRNTSVMBSPY
1 month +9.8%+17.0%+166.0% -0.2%
3 months -4.0%+19.1%+166.0% +3.9%
6 months -0.2%+18.2%+56.5% +8.2%
Year to date +11.6%+26.6%+23.7% +12.9%
1 year +24.6%+19.9%+26.7% +12.3%
3 years -5.2%+32.8%-99.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -1.8%+9.9%-79.3% +23.3%
5 years -17.8%-89.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.8%-35.7%— +10.9%
10 years +29.8%+74.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.6%+5.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFTVKRNTSVMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.7%43.8%129.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.0%40.5%380.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.601.520.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.920.450.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.1%-93.0%-99.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.0%-0.6%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $64.16$18.31$2.66 $779.14
52-week low $49.16$12.31$0.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTVKRNTSVMB
P/E now vs peer median 35.1xmedian 25.2x -40.5xmedian 25.2x -245.4xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 1.9x 3.9xmedian 1.9x 1,193xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 14.0x -17.1xmedian 14.0x -250.2xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 21.7x 31.6xmedian 21.7x -511.1xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x -44.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -4.25median 1.32 -1.11median 1.32 5.79median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTVKRNTSVMB
Revenue $4.32B $215.85M $1.24M
Gross profit $2.73B $97.83M -$132.45K
Operating income $786.70M -$40.02M -$6.50M
Net income $534.40M -$20.32M -$6.64M
Free cash flow $937.60M $26.70M -$2.89M
R&D $262.00M $20.41M $245.84K
EPS (diluted) $1.74 $-0.45 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $374.20M $33.81M $47.85K
Total debt $3.51B – $27.85M
Shares (diluted) 307.60M 45.24M 555.32M
Enterprise value $18.01B -$717.58M $1.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTVKRNTSVMB
P/E 35.1x -40.5x -245.4x
P/FCF 19.9x 31.6x -511.1x
P/Operating cash flow 17.7x 28.3x -551.0x
P/S 4.3x 3.9x 1,193x
P/B 3.1x 1.3x -44.7x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 1.3x -44.7x
EV/EBITDA 17.6x -17.1x -250.2x
EV/EBIT 27.7x -11.7x -231.6x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 2.2x 1,216x
EV/FCF 23.2x 17.6x -520.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.7x 15.8x -561.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.25 -1.11 5.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTVKRNTSVMB
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.6% 4.0% -45.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.3% -2.7% -21.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% -1.6% -143.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.9% 9.5% 42.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% -28.0% -71.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 21.6% -11.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -30.5% -80.4% -283.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% 38.6% -9.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.8% -89.3% -431.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -8.3% 36.6% -42.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.6% -40.1% -32.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.6% 33.9% -178.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.8% -41.6% -60.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.5% 34.6% -29.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTVKRNTSVMB
Gross margin 63.2% 45.3% -10.7%
EBITDA margin 28.6% -12.7% -486.0%
Operating margin 18.2% -18.5% -525.0%
Pretax margin 15.6% -9.0% -535.8%
Net margin 12.4% -9.4% -486.2%
FCF margin 21.7% 12.4% -233.5%
Operating cash flow margin 24.4% 13.8% -216.6%
Return on equity 8.8% -3.0% –
Return on assets 4.6% -2.7% -87.5%
Return on invested capital 7.4% – –
Return on capital employed 7.6% -5.9% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x -1.5x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 2.7% 9.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTVKRNTSVMB
Debt / assets 30.2% – 373.6%
Debt / equity 0.6x – -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x – -4.6x
Debt / FCF 3.7x – -9.6x
Liabilities / assets 47.7% 11.4% 543.0%
Equity / assets 52.3% 88.6% -443.0%
Interest coverage 12.8x – -98.6x
Current ratio 1.2x 8.8x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x 6.6x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 5.7x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.33 – 9.42

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTVKRNTSVMB
Dividend yield 0.4% – –
Net buyback yield 10.6% -4.6% –
Shareholder yield 11.0% -4.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 6.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -48.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -17.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTVKRNTSVMB
Forward P/E 19.3xFY2026 91.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.20FY2026 $0.20FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 -35.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +50.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.63BFY2026 $229.31MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 +10.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -6.7% +0.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTVKRNTSVMB
Held by institutions 100.0% 90.9% –
Institutions holding 803 118 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -3.9% –
Institutions buying 350 65 –
Institutions selling 301 35 –
Buyers to sellers 1.16 1.86 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTVKRNTSVMB
FTV 1.00 0.15 0.15
KRNT 0.15 1.00 0.09
SVMB 0.15 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTV, KRNT and SVMB?

Fortive (FTV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortive (FTV) $19.54B, Kornit Digital (KRNT) $825.26M, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) $1.48B.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortive (FTV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortive (FTV) +5.6%, Kornit Digital (KRNT) +4.0%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -45.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Fortive (FTV) 12.4%, Kornit Digital (KRNT) -9.4%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -486.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jingbo Technology (SVMB) returned the most: Fortive (FTV) +24.6%, Kornit Digital (KRNT) +19.9%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) +26.7%. Over five years, Fortive (FTV) compounded fastest (Fortive (FTV) -3.8%/yr, Kornit Digital (KRNT) -35.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fortive (FTV) 0.00%, Kornit Digital (KRNT) 0.00%. Kornit Digital (KRNT) and Jingbo Technology (SVMB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortive (FTV) has been the steadiest (Fortive (FTV) 26.7%, Kornit Digital (KRNT) 43.8%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) 129.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTV, KRNT and SVMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortive (FTV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.