FTNT vs RDWR vs PANW Stock Comparison

Fortinet, Radware and Palo Alto Networks Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$183.33 +5.7% 1M +114.3% 1Y
Market cap
$135.52B
P/E
63.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.53B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins
RDWR Radware Ltd
$32.30 +9.3% 1M +21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.52B
P/E
89.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$317.65M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$390.46 +4.2% 1M +79.8% 1Y
Market cap
$300.92B
P/E
980.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 5, Palo Alto Networks 3, Radware 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTNTRDWRPANWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $135.52B $1.52B $300.92B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 63.9x 89.8x 980.2x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 51.2x 25.8x 89.4x RDWR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.8% +10.0% +24.5% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% 5.3% 2.7% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 111.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +114.3% +21.9% +79.8% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.4%/yr -1.5%/yr +36.6%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.8% 44.1% 49.6% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 55/100 49/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FTNTRDWRPANW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTNTRDWRPANW
Valuation 49 #64 of 124 74 #33 of 124 42 #72 of 124
Growth 64 #41 of 113 52 #55 of 113 37 #72 of 113
Profitability 100 #1 of 110 73 #31 of 110 76 #27 of 110
Financial Health 55 #59 of 129 – 38 #81 of 129
Shareholder Returns 76 #17 of 67 20 #54 of 67 52 #33 of 67
Overall 69 55 49
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RDWR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTNTRDWRPANWSPY
1 month +5.7%+9.3%+4.2% -0.8%
3 months +20.3%+10.2%+23.0% +3.5%
6 months +114.0%+22.0%+113.5% +7.0%
Year to date +130.9%+34.1%+112.0% +12.2%
1 year +114.3%+21.9%+79.8% +13.0%
3 years +225.9%+114.9%+227.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +48.3%+29.1%+48.5% +23.1%
5 years +185.9%-7.4%+375.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +23.4%-1.5%+36.6% +11.0%
10 years +2,935.3%+145.1%+1,447.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +40.7%+9.4%+31.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFTNTRDWRPANWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.8%44.1%49.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.8%49.6%46.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.991.261.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.670.501.61 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-65.5%-36.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.9%0.0%-7.0% -1.8%
52-week high $194.75$32.30$419.91 $779.14
52-week low $75.23$21.74$141.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTNTRDWRPANW
P/E now vs peer median 63.4xmedian 38.1x 81.7xmedian 38.1x 952.6xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 4.3x 4.4xmedian 4.3x 27.7xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 44.1xmedian 35.4x 50.8xmedian 35.4x 147.3xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.1xmedian 27.1x 27.1xmedian 27.1x 77.4xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 86.7xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 3.4x 11.6xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.18median 1.27 1.80median 1.27 -65.83median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTNTRDWRPANW
Revenue $7.53B $317.65M $11.48B
Gross profit $6.04B $256.69M $8.08B
Operating income $2.44B $14.03M $695.00M
Net income $2.12B $16.95M $307.00M
Free cash flow $3.12B $51.38M $4.11B
R&D $846.40M $85.70M $2.55B
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $0.38 $0.40
Cash & equivalents $2.93B $85.20M $2.51B
Total debt $2.99B – –
Shares (diluted) 739.90M 44.70M 764.00M
Enterprise value $121.45B $1.05B $285.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTNTRDWRPANW
P/E 63.4x 81.7x 952.6x
P/FCF 43.1x 27.1x 77.4x
P/Operating cash flow 39.6x 33.2x 69.9x
P/S 17.9x 4.4x 27.7x
P/B 86.7x 3.9x 11.6x
P/Tangible book 91.2x 3.9x 15.5x
EV/EBITDA 44.1x 50.8x 147.3x
EV/EBIT 53.6x 91.2x 453.5x
EV/Revenue 17.4x 4.0x 27.5x
EV/FCF 42.0x 24.9x 76.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 38.5x 30.5x 69.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.18 1.80 -65.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTNTRDWRPANW
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.8% 10.0% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.7% 4.4% 18.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% 9.8% 19.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 4.3% 17.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% 38.4% -44.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.6% 37.9% 21.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.3% 19.7% -72.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.0% 45.2% -11.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 14.2% 16.1% -74.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.1% 45.3% -14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.5% -34.9% 22.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 41.8% 17.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.3% -27.3% 18.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 31.9% 16.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTNTRDWRPANW
Gross margin 80.2% 80.8% 70.4%
EBITDA margin 39.4% 7.9% 18.6%
Operating margin 32.4% 4.4% 6.1%
Pretax margin 34.8% 9.7% 4.7%
Net margin 28.2% 5.3% 2.7%
FCF margin 41.4% 16.2% 35.8%
Operating cash flow margin 45.1% 13.2% 39.7%
Return on equity 166.9% 4.7% 1.1%
Return on assets 20.4% 2.6% 0.6%
Return on invested capital 111.7% – –
Return on capital employed 44.2% – 1.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 2.5x 14.8x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 8.0% 15.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTNTRDWRPANW
Debt / assets 4.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.2x – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 85.7% 45.1% 43.3%
Equity / assets 14.3% 54.9% 56.7%
Interest coverage 135.7x – –
Current ratio 1.3x – 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.1x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.8x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score 10.21 – 9.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTNTRDWRPANW
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 2.1% -4.2% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 2.1% -4.2% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTNTRDWRPANW
Forward P/E 51.2xFY2026 25.8xFY2026 89.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.58FY2026 $1.25FY2026 $4.37FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 +8.7%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +0.8% +15.2% +16.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.38BFY2026 $347.90MFY2026 $13.37BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +23.2%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +13.2% +0.4% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTNTRDWRPANW
Held by institutions 68.6% 70.5% 82.1%
Institutions holding 1,567 135 2,912
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.7% -4.7% +6.6%
Institutions buying 854 69 1,545
Institutions selling 549 44 1,125
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.57 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTNTRDWRPANW
FTNT 1.00 0.52 0.77
RDWR 0.52 1.00 0.53
PANW 0.77 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTNT, RDWR and PANW?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortinet (FTNT) $135.52B, Radware (RDWR) $1.52B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $300.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTNT, RDWR and PANW?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortinet (FTNT) 63.9x, Radware (RDWR) 89.8x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 980.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Radware (RDWR) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 51.2x, Radware (RDWR) 25.8x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 89.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%, Radware (RDWR) +10.0%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%, Radware (RDWR) 5.3%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: Fortinet (FTNT) +114.3%, Radware (RDWR) +21.9%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +79.8%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +23.4%/yr, Radware (RDWR) -1.5%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Fortinet (FTNT) 42.8%, Radware (RDWR) 44.1%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 49.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTNT, RDWR and PANW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.