FTI vs INVX vs LSE Stock Comparison

TechnipFMC, Innovex International and Leishen Energy Holding Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OIS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTI TechnipFMC plc
$64.50 -8.3% 1M +54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$25.15B
P/E
19.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.67B
Div. yield
0.31%
Oilfield Equipment Energy
9 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

TechnipFMC leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (TechnipFMC 9, Innovex International 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTIINVXLSELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.15B $1.79B $75.42M FTI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.7x 36.7x — FTI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x 15.3x — INVX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.1% +7.0% — FTI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.0% 4.8% — FTI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.5% 4.1% — INVX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -1.2x — FTI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.31% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.1% +30.1% -15.5% FTI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +54.2%/yr +1.6%/yr — FTI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.1% 44.8% 85.8% FTI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 57/100 — FTI

Percentile Scorecard

FTIINVXLSE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTIINVXLSE
Valuation 15 #40 of 47 39 #29 of 47 –
Growth 98 #2 of 44 58 #19 of 44 –
Profitability 58 #18 of 41 53 #20 of 41 –
Financial Health 44 #26 of 46 98 #2 of 46 91 #5 of 46
Shareholder Returns 71 #10 of 32 36 #21 of 32 –
Overall 57 57 –
  • FTI ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • INVX ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • LSE ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTIINVXLSESPY
1 month -8.3%-10.2%-2.6% -1.0%
3 months -6.9%-16.0%-9.2% -0.4%
6 months -12.8%-5.9%-11.2% +4.5%
Year to date +44.7%+16.7%+1.4% +12.4%
1 year +54.1%+30.1%-15.5% +13.6%
3 years +189.9%+10.9%— +76.4%
3 years, per year +42.6%+3.5%— +20.8%
5 years +770.4%+8.0%— +63.7%
5 years, per year +54.2%+1.6%— +10.4%
10 years +168.9%-46.4%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +10.4%-6.1%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFTIINVXLSESPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.1%44.8%85.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.6%44.9%89.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.330.710.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.690.67-0.18 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.7%-68.9%-74.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-19.6%-22.0% -1.6%
52-week high $80.11$31.73$5.68 $779.14
52-week low $41.86$19.52$3.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTIINVXLSE
P/E now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 23.0x 36.7xmedian 23.0x —median 23.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.1x 1.7xmedian 1.1x —median 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 101.9xmedian 8.3x 12.1xmedian 8.3x —median 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 15.0x 14.9xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.5x 1.6xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.48 -1.05median 0.48 —median 0.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTIINVXLSE
Revenue $10.67B $1.02B –
Gross profit $2.74B $343.15M –
Operating income -$166.90M $70.07M –
Net income $1.29B $48.61M –
Free cash flow $1.59B $120.10M –
R&D $101.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $3.23 $0.69 –
Cash & equivalents $1.05B $188.76M $10.32M
Total debt $404.00M $24.15M $2.89M
Shares (diluted) 398.20M 70.65M 16.68M
Enterprise value $21.12B $974.22M -$28.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTIINVXLSE
P/E 19.7x 36.7x –
P/FCF 15.8x 14.9x –
P/Operating cash flow 13.5x 12.1x –
P/S 2.4x 1.7x –
P/B 7.5x 1.6x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 8.4x 1.8x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 101.9x 12.1x –
EV/EBIT -146.8x 23.2x –
EV/Revenue 2.3x 1.6x –
EV/FCF 15.4x 13.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 11.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 -1.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTIINVXLSE
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.1% 7.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.8% 25.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.9% 11.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 21.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 96.2% -47.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 66.0% -12.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 34.9% -51.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 247.8% -8.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 41.7% -52.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 254.6% -35.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.3% -15.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 49.5% 29.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.4% -14.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.2% 27.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTIINVXLSE
Gross margin 25.7% 33.6% –
EBITDA margin 2.3% 13.2% –
Operating margin -1.6% 6.9% –
Pretax margin 15.3% 7.4% –
Net margin 12.0% 4.8% –
FCF margin 14.9% 11.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 17.5% 14.5% –
Return on equity 38.8% 4.5% –
Return on assets 12.4% 3.5% –
Return on invested capital -3.5% 4.1% –
Return on capital employed -3.4% 5.9% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 3.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTIINVXLSE
Debt / assets 3.9% 1.7% 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -1.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.3x 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 21.1% 36.6%
Equity / assets 32.0% 78.9% 63.4%
Interest coverage -2.9x 19.1x –
Current ratio 1.1x 4.4x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 2.4x 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.0x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 2.68 5.33 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTIINVXLSE
Dividend yield 0.3% – –
Net buyback yield 4.7% 0.8% –
Shareholder yield 5.0% 0.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTIINVXLSE
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 15.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.00FY2026 $1.67FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +22.4%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.0% +13.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.35BFY2026 $1.08BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +17.4% +9.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTIINVXLSE
Held by institutions 97.3% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 818 224 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.8% +1.1% –
Institutions buying 461 123 –
Institutions selling 277 68 –
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.81 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTIINVXLSE
FTI 1.00 0.54 0.17
INVX 0.54 1.00 0.10
LSE 0.17 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTI, INVX and LSE?

TechnipFMC (FTI) is the largest by market capitalisation: TechnipFMC (FTI) $25.15B, Innovex International (INVX) $1.79B, Leishen Energy Holding (LSE) $75.42M.

Which stock is cheaper, FTI, INVX and LSE?

TechnipFMC (FTI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (TechnipFMC (FTI) 19.7x, Innovex International (INVX) 36.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Innovex International (INVX) is cheapest (TechnipFMC (FTI) 21.5x, Innovex International (INVX) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

TechnipFMC (FTI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: TechnipFMC (FTI) +9.1%, Innovex International (INVX) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

TechnipFMC (FTI) has the highest net margin (TechnipFMC (FTI) 12.0%, Innovex International (INVX) 4.8%). On return on invested capital, Innovex International (INVX) leads (TechnipFMC (FTI) -3.5%, Innovex International (INVX) 4.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year TechnipFMC (FTI) returned the most: TechnipFMC (FTI) +54.1%, Innovex International (INVX) +30.1%, Leishen Energy Holding (LSE) -15.5%. Over five years, TechnipFMC (FTI) compounded fastest (TechnipFMC (FTI) +54.2%/yr, Innovex International (INVX) +1.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: TechnipFMC (FTI) 0.31%, Leishen Energy Holding (LSE) 0.00%. Innovex International (INVX) and Leishen Energy Holding (LSE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TechnipFMC (FTI) has been the steadiest (TechnipFMC (FTI) 32.1%, Innovex International (INVX) 44.8%, Leishen Energy Holding (LSE) 85.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTI, INVX and LSE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, TechnipFMC (FTI) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.