FTHM vs RMR vs OPAD Stock Comparison

Fathom Holdings, Rmr and Offerpad Solutions Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.
$0.17 -70.7% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$406.93M
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
2 wins
RMR Rmr Group Inc.
$17.32 -6.5% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$555.63M
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$638.98M
Div. yield
10.39%
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
7 wins
OPAD Offerpad Solutions Inc.
$2.45 -27.1% 1M -91.2% 1Y
Market cap
$11.84M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$404.53M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Rmr leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Rmr 7, Fathom Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTHMRMROPADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.74M $555.63M $11.84M RMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.2x 14.7x -0.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.3% -15.2% -42.5% FTHM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6.3% 3.1% -9.8% RMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -42.0% 6.1% -55.7% RMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.5x 1.6x 0.6x FTHM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 10.39% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.1% +17.9% -91.2% RMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -63.3%/yr -13.4%/yr -71.0%/yr RMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 120.2% 27.4% 102.7% RMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 55/100 49/100 RMR

Percentile Scorecard

FTHMRMROPAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTHMRMROPAD
Valuation 35 #12 of 18 77 #5 of 18 82 #8 of 39
Growth 20 #13 of 16 7 #15 of 16 45 #18 of 32
Profitability 20 #13 of 16 60 #7 of 16 32 #20 of 29
Financial Health 6 #16 of 17 75 #5 of 17 38 #24 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 20 55 49
  • FTHM ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • RMR ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • OPAD ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTHMRMROPADSPY
1 month -70.7%-6.5%-27.1% -0.2%
3 months -80.2%-13.6%-40.0% +3.9%
6 months -82.5%-3.8%-70.5% +8.2%
Year to date -83.2%+16.2%-79.8% +12.9%
1 year -90.1%+17.9%-91.2% +12.3%
3 years -94.1%-20.6%-96.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -61.1%-7.4%-68.6% +23.3%
5 years -99.3%-51.4%-99.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -63.3%-13.4%-71.0% +10.9%
10 years —-50.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-6.8%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFTHMRMROPADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 120.2%27.4%102.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 109.6%25.8%99.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.120.303.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.750.65-0.89 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-63.0%-99.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -90.1%-19.0%-91.2% -1.2%
52-week high $1.71$21.37$27.80 $779.14
52-week low $0.17$14.45$2.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTHMRMROPAD
P/E now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 21.2x 14.7xmedian 21.2x -0.3xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 0.7x 0.0xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 9.8x 9.8xmedian 9.8x 0.2xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 12.3x -10.7xmedian 12.3x 0.2xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.8x 1.4xmedian 1.8x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 0.52 -0.46median 0.52 -0.01median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTHMRMROPAD
Revenue $406.93M $638.98M $404.53M
Gross profit – – $30.02M
Operating income -$20.72M $40.72M -$31.34M
Net income -$25.50M $43.87M -$39.85M
Free cash flow -$13.58M -$51.85M $73.60M
R&D $7.90M – $3.24M
EPS (diluted) $-0.76 $1.18 $-8.31
Cash & equivalents $4.50M $58.20M $33.12M
Total debt $25.06M $163.81M $14.72M
Shares (diluted) 33.42M 16.79M 4.80M
Enterprise value -$13.33M $480.09M -$119.60M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTHMRMROPAD
P/E -0.2x 14.7x -0.3x
P/FCF -0.4x -10.7x 0.2x
P/Operating cash flow -0.4x 5.6x 0.2x
P/S 0.0x 0.9x 0.0x
P/B 0.2x 1.4x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 1.5x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x 9.8x 0.2x
EV/EBIT -1.3x 16.2x 0.2x
EV/Revenue 0.1x 1.0x 0.0x
EV/FCF -1.9x -12.8x -0.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -2.0x 6.7x -0.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 -0.46 -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTHMRMROPAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.3% -15.2% -42.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -13.3% -44.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -42.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 62.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.2% -0.5% 25.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -30.3% 50.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.0% 0.7% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -31.8% 48.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.2% 0.7% 59.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.2% -31.9% 56.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -9.0% 81.1% 49.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.7% -7.6% -54.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.4% -25.2% 70.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.5% -34.4% -54.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTHMRMROPAD
Gross margin – – 7.4%
EBITDA margin -3.4% 10.5% -7.4%
Operating margin -5.1% 6.4% -7.7%
Pretax margin -6.3% 8.3% -9.7%
Net margin -6.3% 3.1% -9.8%
FCF margin -3.3% -8.1% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin -3.3% 15.4% 18.2%
Return on equity -95.2% 10.9% -95.8%
Return on assets -35.0% 6.3% -25.7%
Return on invested capital -42.0% 6.1% -55.7%
Return on capital employed -74.2% 6.9% -52.8%
Asset turnover 5.6x 0.9x 2.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 2.2x -1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTHMRMROPAD
Debt / assets 34.1% 23.0% 9.2%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.5x 1.6x 0.6x
Debt / FCF -1.8x -3.2x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 67.5% 44.1% 76.7%
Equity / assets 32.5% 55.9% 23.3%
Interest coverage – 4.0x -3.4x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.4x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.07 3.14 -2.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTHMRMROPAD
Dividend yield – 10.4% –
Net buyback yield -112.6% 0.2% -204.1%
Shareholder yield -112.6% 10.5% -204.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 69.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -59.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTHMRMROPAD
Forward P/E – 27.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.14FY2026 $0.64FY2026 $-7.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -43.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +17.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $472.49MFY2026 $671.70MFY2026 $410.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.4%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026 -27.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +1.6% +71.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTHMRMROPAD
Held by institutions 13.2% 75.5% 28.3%
Institutions holding 42 165 21
Change in shares held, QoQ +35.1% +1.6% +5.3%
Institutions buying 14 81 21
Institutions selling 11 32 0
Buyers to sellers 1.27 2.53 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTHMRMROPAD
FTHM 1.00 0.10 0.20
RMR 0.10 1.00 0.08
OPAD 0.20 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTHM, RMR and OPAD?

Rmr (RMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fathom Holdings (FTHM) $5.74M, Rmr (RMR) $555.63M, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) $11.84M.

Which company is growing faster?

Fathom Holdings (FTHM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fathom Holdings (FTHM) +4.3%, Rmr (RMR) -15.2%, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) -42.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rmr (RMR) has the highest net margin (Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -6.3%, Rmr (RMR) 3.1%, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) -9.8%). On return on invested capital, Rmr (RMR) leads (Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -42.0%, Rmr (RMR) 6.1%, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) -55.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rmr (RMR) returned the most: Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -90.1%, Rmr (RMR) +17.9%, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) -91.2%. Over five years, Rmr (RMR) compounded fastest (Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -63.3%/yr, Rmr (RMR) -13.4%/yr, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) -71.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rmr (RMR) 10.39%. Fathom Holdings (FTHM) and Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rmr (RMR) has been the steadiest (Fathom Holdings (FTHM) 120.2%, Rmr (RMR) 27.4%, Offerpad Solutions (OPAD) 102.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTHM, RMR and OPAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rmr (RMR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.