FSV vs RTO vs UNF Stock Comparison

FirstService, Rentokil Initial and Unifirst Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FSV FirstService Corp
$144.50 +11.8% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.61B
P/E
57.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
1.02%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
RTO Rentokil Initial Plc /Fi
$23.27 +16.2% 1M -15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.76B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.71%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins
UNF Unifirst Corp
$256.86 +0.9% 1M +65.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.66B
P/E
42.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.52B
Div. yield
0.56%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Unifirst leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Unifirst 6, Rentokil Initial 3, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFSVRTOUNFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.61B $11.76B $4.66B RTO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 57.1x — 42.5x UNF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.7x 16.3x 32.6x RTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.7% — +3.7% UNF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.0% — 4.3% UNF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.02% 2.71% 0.56% RTO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.2% -15.4% +65.1% UNF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.3%/yr -10.7%/yr +5.4%/yr UNF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.8% 34.5% 34.5% FSV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 — 44/100 UNF

Percentile Scorecard

FSVRTOUNF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFSVRTOUNF
Valuation 43 #65 of 113 – 38 #71 of 113
Growth 55 #44 of 96 – 30 #68 of 96
Profitability 63 #34 of 91 – 53 #43 of 91
Financial Health 38 #76 of 122 – 86 #18 of 122
Shareholder Returns 9 #60 of 66 40 #40 of 66 12 #58 of 66
Overall 42 – 44
  • FSV ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RTO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • UNF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFSVRTOUNFSPY
1 month +11.8%+16.2%+0.9% +0.7%
3 months 0.0%-4.1%-12.5% +3.7%
6 months +8.0%-31.3%+0.5% +7.1%
Year to date -7.1%-21.0%+33.2% +12.8%
1 year -7.2%-15.4%+65.1% +11.9%
3 years +1.8%-10.5%+57.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +0.6%-3.6%+16.4% +22.8%
5 years -27.7%-43.2%+29.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -6.3%-10.7%+5.4% +10.9%
10 years +251.9%+63.0%+110.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.4%+5.0%+7.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFSVRTOUNFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.8%34.5%34.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%36.8%25.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.320.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.451.89 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-54.2%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.5%-32.6%-14.8% -1.2%
52-week high $165.10$34.52$301.48 $779.14
52-week low $125.66$19.75$150.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFSVRTOUNF
P/E now vs peer median 57.1xmedian 21.9x —median 21.9x 42.5xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x 1.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x 16.1xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x 65.8xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 153.10median 0.97 —median 0.97 14.73median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFSVRTOUNF
Revenue $5.68B – $2.52B
Gross profit $1.88B – $922.95M
Operating income $339.62M – $136.04M
Net income $199.45M – $109.49M
Free cash flow $536.84M – $70.77M
EPS (diluted) $2.52 – $6.02
Cash & equivalents $160.76M $2.47B $192.12M
Total debt $1.55B -$1.94B –
Shares (diluted) 45.75M 507.00M 18.20M
Enterprise value $6.47B $5.27B $4.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFSVRTOUNF
P/E 57.1x – 42.5x
P/FCF 12.3x – 65.8x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x – 22.7x
P/S 1.2x – 1.8x
P/B 7.1x – 2.1x
P/Tangible book 7.1x – 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x – 16.1x
EV/EBIT 23.6x – 32.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x – 1.8x
EV/FCF 14.9x – 63.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.2x – 21.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 153.10 – 14.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFSVRTOUNF
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.7% – 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – 4.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.6% – 3.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% – 7.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.6% – -26.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.7% – 0.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% – -26.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 1.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.3% – -24.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.4% – 2.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.1% – -30.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.1% – -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% – -50.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% – 17.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFSVRTOUNF
Gross margin 33.1% – 36.6%
EBITDA margin 9.5% – 11.0%
Operating margin 6.0% – 5.4%
Pretax margin 4.8% – 5.6%
Net margin 2.0% – 4.3%
FCF margin 9.4% – 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 7.4% – 8.1%
Return on equity 18.5% – 4.9%
Return on assets 4.5% – 3.8%
Return on invested capital 10.0% – –
Return on capital employed 9.8% – 5.4%
Asset turnover 1.3x – 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x – 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFSVRTOUNF
Debt / assets 34.9% -13.4% –
Debt / equity 1.7x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – –
Debt / FCF 2.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 78.9% – 22.3%
Equity / assets 21.1% – 77.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.7x -683.2x 3.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x -411.8x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x -411.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – – 6.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFSVRTOUNF
Dividend yield 1.0% 2.7% 0.6%
Net buyback yield -9.1% – 0.7%
Shareholder yield -8.1% 2.7% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFSVRTOUNF
Forward P/E 24.7xFY2026 16.3xFY2026 32.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $5.84FY2026 $1.43FY2026 $7.88FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026 -2.7%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% +2.1% +12.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.42BFY2026 $7.01BFY2026 $2.79BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026 +10.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +20.0% +13.5% -9.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFSVRTOUNF
Held by institutions 69.9% 15.4% 81.3%
Institutions holding 276 288 341
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% +5.9% -2.5%
Institutions buying 148 162 162
Institutions selling 101 90 121
Buyers to sellers 1.47 1.80 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FSVRTOUNF
FSV 1.00 0.25 0.17
RTO 0.25 1.00 0.33
UNF 0.17 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FSV, RTO and UNF?

Rentokil Initial (RTO) is the largest by market capitalisation: FirstService (FSV) $6.61B, Rentokil Initial (RTO) $11.76B, Unifirst (UNF) $4.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, FSV, RTO and UNF?

Unifirst (UNF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FirstService (FSV) 57.1x, Unifirst (UNF) 42.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rentokil Initial (RTO) is cheapest (FirstService (FSV) 24.7x, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 16.3x, Unifirst (UNF) 32.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unifirst (UNF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FirstService (FSV) +3.7%, Unifirst (UNF) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Unifirst (UNF) has the highest net margin (FirstService (FSV) 2.0%, Unifirst (UNF) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unifirst (UNF) returned the most: FirstService (FSV) -7.2%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -15.4%, Unifirst (UNF) +65.1%. Over five years, Unifirst (UNF) compounded fastest (FirstService (FSV) -6.3%/yr, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -10.7%/yr, Unifirst (UNF) +5.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rentokil Initial (RTO) has the highest dividend yield: FirstService (FSV) 1.02%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 2.71%, Unifirst (UNF) 0.56%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstService (FSV) has been the steadiest (FirstService (FSV) 30.8%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 34.5%, Unifirst (UNF) 34.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FSV, RTO and UNF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Unifirst (UNF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.