FSS vs CMI vs BWA Stock Comparison

Federal Signal, Cummins and Borgwarner Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FSS Federal Signal Corp /De/
$114.29 -0.3% 1M -8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$7.07B
P/E
24.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
7 wins
CMI Cummins Inc
$521.78 -0.7% 1M +23.8% 1Y
Market cap
$73.13B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$34.71B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
BWA Borgwarner Inc
$55.12 -10.1% 1M +25.3% 1Y
Market cap
$11.30B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Federal Signal leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Federal Signal 7, Borgwarner 3, Cummins 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFSSCMIBWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.07B $73.13B $11.30B CMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.8x 26.9x 27.2x FSS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.2x 16.6x 10.2x BWA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.0% +2.9% +2.2% FSS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.7% 7.8% 2.9% FSS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.3% 13.6% 5.0% FSS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 0.7x — CMI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% BWA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.8% +23.8% +25.3% BWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.3%/yr +17.3%/yr +4.3%/yr FSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.0% 37.2% 40.8% FSS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 60/100 62/100 FSS

Percentile Scorecard

FSSCMIBWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFSSCMIBWA
Valuation 52 #99 of 203 51 #101 of 203 92 #17 of 203
Growth 94 #13 of 187 54 #87 of 187 46 #101 of 187
Profitability 89 #22 of 185 71 #54 of 185 48 #96 of 185
Financial Health 75 #55 of 219 51 #107 of 219 47 #117 of 219
Shareholder Returns 65 #54 of 153 72 #44 of 153 76 #37 of 153
Overall 75 60 62
  • FSS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CMI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • BWA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFSSCMIBWASPY
1 month -0.3%-0.7%-10.1% -0.8%
3 months -3.5%-21.1%-13.4% +3.5%
6 months -1.2%-21.0%-0.5% +7.0%
Year to date +5.2%+2.2%+22.3% +12.2%
1 year -8.8%+23.8%+25.3% +13.0%
3 years +99.6%+142.4%+50.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.9%+34.4%+14.6% +23.1%
5 years +173.9%+122.2%+23.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +22.3%+17.3%+4.3% +11.0%
10 years +835.3%+312.4%+55.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +25.1%+15.2%+4.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFSSCMIBWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.0%37.2%40.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.9%38.0%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.281.641.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.250.640.62 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.3%-30.8%-51.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.5%-28.3%-28.4% -1.8%
52-week high $133.73$727.59$77.03 $779.14
52-week low $104.77$414.30$40.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFSSCMIBWA
P/E now vs peer median 24.4xmedian 26.0x 26.5xmedian 26.0x 27.0xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.9x 2.1xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 14.0x 15.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 21.4x 21.3xmedian 21.4x 9.3xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 5.2xmedian 2.2x 1.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.85median 1.26 8.26median 1.26 -1.29median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFSSCMIBWA
Revenue $2.45B $34.71B $14.34B
Gross profit $714.00M $8.79B $2.79B
Operating income $395.40M $3.89B $716.00M
Net income $285.40M $2.83B $478.00M
Free cash flow $339.20M $3.37B $1.21B
R&D – $1.44B –
EPS (diluted) $4.64 $19.60 $2.01
Cash & equivalents $62.80M $3.18B $2.45B
Total debt $453.60M $7.35B $3.87B
Shares (diluted) 61.50M 138.50M 206.30M
Enterprise value $6.82B $69.21B $2.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFSSCMIBWA
P/E 24.4x 26.5x 27.0x
P/FCF 20.6x 21.3x 9.3x
P/Operating cash flow 18.7x 15.5x 6.5x
P/S 2.8x 2.1x 0.8x
P/B 4.6x 5.2x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 6.2x 6.1x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.2x 15.0x –
EV/EBIT 18.6x 19.3x 17.7x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 2.2x 0.9x
EV/FCF 21.7x 22.4x 10.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.8x 16.2x 7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.85 8.26 -1.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFSSCMIBWA
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.0% 2.9% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 2.5% 1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.5% 1.7% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.1% 4.8% 3.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.8% -6.0% 49.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.8% 4.1% -14.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% -7.8% 81.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 2.9% -21.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.4% -7.7% 109.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 3.2% -20.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.6% 63.4% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.2% 28.8% 14.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 49.8% 103.8% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.3% 45.3% 43.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFSSCMIBWA
Gross margin 29.2% 25.3% 19.5%
EBITDA margin 19.8% 14.4% –
Operating margin 16.2% 11.2% 5.0%
Pretax margin 15.2% 11.1% 4.9%
Net margin 11.7% 7.8% 2.9%
FCF margin 13.9% 9.7% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin 15.2% 13.4% 12.0%
Return on equity 19.4% 20.7% 8.4%
Return on assets 11.7% 8.1% 3.5%
Return on invested capital 15.3% 13.6% 5.0%
Return on capital employed 18.5% 16.0% 6.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.6x 3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFSSCMIBWA
Debt / assets 18.6% 20.6% 27.8%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 1.3x 2.2x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 38.2% 61.0% 58.4%
Equity / assets 61.8% 39.0% 41.6%
Interest coverage 19.3x 12.1x –
Current ratio 2.7x 1.7x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 7.13 4.51 3.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFSSCMIBWA
Dividend yield 0.5% 1.6% 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 0.7% 5.8%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 2.2% 7.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 12.6% – 29.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.6% – 11.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) 13.6% – 45.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 17.0% – -4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFSSCMIBWA
Forward P/E 23.2xFY2026 16.6xFY2026 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.92FY2026 $31.39FY2026 $5.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +31.9%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% +14.7% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.79BFY2026 $35.38BFY2026 $13.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.1%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 -4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% +11.3% +0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFSSCMIBWA
Held by institutions 100.0% 85.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 474 2,105 815
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +1.0% +3.7%
Institutions buying 249 1,048 419
Institutions selling 152 728 295
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.44 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FSSCMIBWA
FSS 1.00 0.45 0.25
CMI 0.45 1.00 0.47
BWA 0.25 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FSS, CMI and BWA?

Cummins (CMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Signal (FSS) $7.07B, Cummins (CMI) $73.13B, Borgwarner (BWA) $11.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, FSS, CMI and BWA?

Federal Signal (FSS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Signal (FSS) 24.8x, Cummins (CMI) 26.9x, Borgwarner (BWA) 27.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Borgwarner (BWA) is cheapest (Federal Signal (FSS) 23.2x, Cummins (CMI) 16.6x, Borgwarner (BWA) 10.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Federal Signal (FSS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Signal (FSS) +24.0%, Cummins (CMI) +2.9%, Borgwarner (BWA) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Signal (FSS) has the highest net margin (Federal Signal (FSS) 11.7%, Cummins (CMI) 7.8%, Borgwarner (BWA) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Federal Signal (FSS) leads (Federal Signal (FSS) 15.3%, Cummins (CMI) 13.6%, Borgwarner (BWA) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Borgwarner (BWA) returned the most: Federal Signal (FSS) -8.8%, Cummins (CMI) +23.8%, Borgwarner (BWA) +25.3%. Over five years, Federal Signal (FSS) compounded fastest (Federal Signal (FSS) +22.3%/yr, Cummins (CMI) +17.3%/yr, Borgwarner (BWA) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Borgwarner (BWA) has the highest dividend yield: Federal Signal (FSS) 0.01%, Cummins (CMI) 0.00%, Borgwarner (BWA) 0.01%. Cummins (CMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Signal (FSS) has been the steadiest (Federal Signal (FSS) 35.0%, Cummins (CMI) 37.2%, Borgwarner (BWA) 40.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FSS, CMI and BWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Signal (FSS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.