FSI vs GRO vs ICL Stock Comparison

Flexible Solutions International, Brazil Potash and Icl Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRO Brazil Potash Corp.
$1.86 -21.2% 1M -27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$76.48M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
ICL ICL Group Ltd.
$4.91 -4.5% 1M -26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.01B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.71B
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Icl leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Icl 6, Flexible Solutions International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFSIGROICLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $79.34M $76.48M $6.01B ICL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.4x -0.9x 8.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 12.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.7% — +10.9% ICL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.8% — 9.0% ICL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -33.8% -27.3% -26.1% ICL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.3%/yr — -10.7%/yr FSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.4% 79.1% 39.0% ICL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 33/100 83/100 ICL

Percentile Scorecard

FSIGROICL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFSIGROICL
Valuation 23 #73 of 94 13 #82 of 94 98 #3 of 94
Growth 2 #89 of 91 53 #43 of 91 49 #47 of 91
Profitability 28 #62 of 86 6 #81 of 86 84 #15 of 86
Financial Health 84 #16 of 95 94 #7 of 95 –
Shareholder Returns 17 #58 of 70 0 #70 of 70 100 #1 of 70
Overall 31 33 83
  • FSI ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • GRO ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ICL ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFSIGROICLSPY
1 month +6.8%-21.2%-4.5% -0.2%
3 months +23.1%-9.3%-6.3% +3.9%
6 months -4.3%-41.0%-9.6% +8.2%
Year to date -7.2%-1.6%-14.0% +12.9%
1 year -33.8%-27.3%-26.1% +12.3%
3 years +223.3%—+2.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +47.9%—+0.7% +23.3%
5 years +70.5%—-43.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.3%—-10.7% +10.9%
10 years +252.5%—+35.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.4%—+3.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFSIGROICLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.4%79.1%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.3%79.2%44.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.691.580.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.74-0.35-0.67 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.1%-90.5%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.8%-52.2%-28.0% -1.2%
52-week high $9.42$3.89$6.82 $779.14
52-week low $4.91$1.69$4.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFSIGROICL
P/E now vs peer median -25.5xmedian 22.0x -0.9xmedian 22.0x 9.2xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 0.8xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 68.1xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x —median 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.9xmedian 15.1x -4.0xmedian 15.1x 5.3xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.6x 0.5xmedian 1.6x —median 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.69median 1.66 —median 1.66 -0.56median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFSIGROICL
Revenue $35.58M – $7.71B
Gross profit $6.80M – $2.36B
Operating income -$933.97K -$95.57M $715.00M
Net income -$1.66M -$28.15M $654.00M
Free cash flow -$3.48M -$24.85M $1.19B
R&D $565.72K – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.24 $-2.04 $0.54
Cash & equivalents $7.20M $75.71M $496.00M
Total debt $29.29M – –
Shares (diluted) 12.74M 42.49M 1.29B
Enterprise value $50.74M -$58.82M $2.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFSIGROICL
P/E -25.5x -0.9x 9.2x
P/FCF -22.9x -4.0x 5.3x
P/Operating cash flow 31.4x -7.9x –
P/S 2.2x – 0.8x
P/B 1.9x 0.5x –
P/Tangible book 2.1x 0.5x –
EV/EBITDA 68.1x – –
EV/EBIT -83.4x -0.3x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 2.2x – 0.8x
EV/FCF -22.4x -1.0x 4.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.7x -1.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.69 – -0.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFSIGROICL
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.7% – 10.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.9% – 1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -50.8% – 5.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -18.0% – 5.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -115.5% -3.3% -1.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.7% – -20.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -141.2% 57.9% -1.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.4% – -18.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -206.7% 27.7% 88.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -36.7% – -16.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -49.2% 20.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -33.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,054% -1.1% -17.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.3% – -8.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFSIGROICL
Gross margin 19.1% – 30.6%
EBITDA margin 3.2% – –
Operating margin -2.6% – 9.3%
Pretax margin -6.5% – 9.9%
Net margin -8.8% – 9.0%
FCF margin -9.8% – 15.4%
Operating cash flow margin 7.1% – –
Return on equity -4.0% -47.7% –
Return on assets -2.7% -43.5% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -1.8% -48.5% –
Asset turnover 0.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFSIGROICL
Debt / assets 10.1% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.5x – –
Debt / FCF -1.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 30.7% 5.4% –
Equity / assets 69.3% 94.6% –
Interest coverage -1.9x -94.7x –
Current ratio 2.8x 42.2x –
Quick ratio 1.6x 41.9x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 41.8x –
Altman Z-score 3.98 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFSIGROICL
Dividend yield – – 12.8%
Net buyback yield -0.3% -63.3% –
Shareholder yield -0.3% -63.3% 12.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFSIGROICL
Forward P/E – – 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.10FY2026 $-0.49FY2026 $0.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -266.7%FY2026 – +11.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $43.78MFY2026 $0.00FY2026 $7.47BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.6%FY2026 – +4.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +69.3% – +13.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFSIGROICL
Held by institutions 9.1% – 13.7%
Institutions holding 31 – 221
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.7% – -13.5%
Institutions buying 11 – 140
Institutions selling 8 – 56
Buyers to sellers 1.38 – 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FSIGROICL
FSI 1.00 0.10 0.02
GRO 0.10 1.00 0.20
ICL 0.02 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FSI, GRO and ICL?

Icl (ICL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flexible Solutions International (FSI) $79.34M, Brazil Potash (GRO) $76.48M, Icl (ICL) $6.01B.

Which company is growing faster?

Icl (ICL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flexible Solutions International (FSI) -4.7%, Icl (ICL) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Icl (ICL) has the highest net margin (Flexible Solutions International (FSI) -8.8%, Icl (ICL) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icl (ICL) returned the most: Flexible Solutions International (FSI) -33.8%, Brazil Potash (GRO) -27.3%, Icl (ICL) -26.1%. Over five years, Flexible Solutions International (FSI) compounded fastest (Flexible Solutions International (FSI) +11.3%/yr, Icl (ICL) -10.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Icl (ICL) has been the steadiest (Flexible Solutions International (FSI) 45.4%, Brazil Potash (GRO) 79.1%, Icl (ICL) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FSI, GRO and ICL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Icl (ICL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.