FRT vs SKT Stock Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust and Tanger Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SKT Tanger Inc.
$36.58 +5.3% 1M +9.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.19B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
–
Retail REITs Real Estate
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 7, Federal Realty Investment Trust 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRTSKTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.46B $4.19B FRT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.1x 17.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.0x 33.3x FRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.0% +11.4% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.1% 40.3% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 3.1x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.9% +9.8% SKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.8%/yr +16.6%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.9% 21.0% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 61/100 SKT

Percentile Scorecard

FRTSKT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRTSKT
Valuation 17 #120 of 145 72 #42 of 145
Growth 50 #72 of 142 80 #29 of 142
Profitability 84 #23 of 136 97 #5 of 136
Financial Health 45 #77 of 139 48 #73 of 139
Shareholder Returns 23 #101 of 131 10 #118 of 131
Overall 44 61
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRTSKTSPY
1 month -1.1%+5.3% -0.8%
3 months -14.0%-12.5% +3.5%
6 months -1.7%-0.5% +7.0%
Year to date +8.4%+9.6% +12.2%
1 year +7.9%+9.8% +13.0%
3 years +26.1%+68.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +8.1%+19.0% +23.1%
5 years -8.8%+115.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.8%+16.6% +11.0%
10 years -25.3%+3.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year -2.9%+0.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFRTSKTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.9%21.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.3%19.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.470.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-36.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.0%-13.1% -1.8%
52-week high $127.13$42.10 $779.14
52-week low $94.87$31.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRTSKT
P/E now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 27.4x 17.0xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 14.2x 12.2xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -25.6xmedian 23.2x 13.0xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.3x 6.0xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 10.73median 2.11 1.94median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRTSKT
Revenue $1.34B $612.31M
Operating income $638.97M –
Net income $446.74M $246.96M
Free cash flow -$371.04M $323.28M
EPS (diluted) $4.97 $2.13
Cash & equivalents $107.25M $176.88M
Total debt $19.28B $1.62B
Shares (diluted) 86.18M 115.73M
Enterprise value $9.01B $3.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRTSKT
P/E 22.0x 17.0x
P/FCF -25.6x 13.0x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x 7.0x
P/S 7.1x 6.9x
P/B 2.8x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 13.7x 12.2x
EV/EBIT 22.2x 19.1x
EV/Revenue 10.6x 9.2x
EV/FCF -38.2x 17.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.4x 9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 10.73 1.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRTSKT
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.0% 11.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.7% 21.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 12.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.3% 19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.3% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 10.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -323.9% 63.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.8% 10.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRTSKT
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 77.2% 75.4%
Operating margin 47.9% –
Pretax margin 33.4% 36.4%
Net margin 32.1% 40.3%
FCF margin -27.8% 52.8%
Operating cash flow margin 47.3% 97.5%
Return on equity 13.1% 18.9%
Return on assets 4.9% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRTSKT
Debt / assets 52.6% 56.6%
Debt / equity 1.4x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 3.1x
Debt / FCF -12.9x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.1% 75.5%
Equity / assets 37.9% 24.5%
Interest coverage 3.3x 4.1x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRTSKT
Dividend yield 4.2% 3.3%
Net buyback yield -0.6% -1.2%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRTSKT
Forward P/E 25.0xFY2026 33.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.38FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.4%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -31.5% +10.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.28BFY2026 $638.63MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% -9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRTSKT
Held by institutions 98.5% 93.8%
Institutions holding 621 361
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 363 172
Institutions selling 162 122
Buyers to sellers 2.24 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRTSKT
FRT 1.00 0.64
SKT 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRT and SKT?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.46B, Tanger (SKT) $4.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, FRT and SKT?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 22.1x, Tanger (SKT) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is cheapest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 25.0x, Tanger (SKT) 33.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.0%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.1%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tanger (SKT) returned the most: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +7.9%, Tanger (SKT) +9.8%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -1.8%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.9%, Tanger (SKT) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FRT and SKT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.64, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FRT and SKT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.