FRT vs KIM vs SKT Stock Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust, Kimco Realty and Tanger Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$23.60 +6.2% 1M +6.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.85B
P/E
27.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.19B
Div. yield
0.05%
Retail REITs Real Estate
2 wins
SKT Tanger Inc.
$36.44 +3.7% 1M +9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.19B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
–
Retail REITs Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 6, Kimco Realty 2, Federal Realty Investment Trust 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRTKIMSKTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.42B $15.85B $4.19B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.0x 27.5x 17.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.8x 29.5x 33.7x FRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.0% +4.4% +11.4% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.1% 26.4% 40.3% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 5.5x 3.1x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.9% +6.2% +9.7% SKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.1%/yr +0.6%/yr +15.8%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.9% 18.1% 21.0% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 64/100 61/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

FRTKIMSKT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRTKIMSKT
Valuation 17 #121 of 145 49 #75 of 145 72 #41 of 145
Growth 49 #74 of 144 65 #51 of 144 79 #31 of 144
Profitability 84 #23 of 140 75 #36 of 140 98 #4 of 140
Financial Health 44 #82 of 146 65 #52 of 146 47 #78 of 146
Shareholder Returns 21 #104 of 132 66 #46 of 132 8 #121 of 132
Overall 43 64 61
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRTKIMSKTSPY
1 month -0.6%+6.2%+3.7% -1.0%
3 months -13.8%-9.6%-13.1% +2.9%
6 months -2.1%-0.4%-0.6% +6.4%
Year to date +7.9%+16.4%+9.2% +11.4%
1 year +7.9%+6.2%+9.7% +13.1%
3 years +24.1%+40.3%+58.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +7.5%+12.0%+16.5% +21.5%
5 years -9.9%+2.8%+108.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year -2.1%+0.6%+15.8% +10.9%
10 years -26.2%-15.7%-0.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year -3.0%-1.7%-0.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFRTKIMSKTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.9%18.1%21.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.2%17.3%19.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.040.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.470.340.46 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-37.8%-36.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.5%-10.6%-13.4% -2.5%
52-week high $127.13$26.39$42.10 $779.14
52-week low $94.87$19.78$31.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRTKIMSKT
P/E now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 27.0x 27.5xmedian 27.0x 16.9xmedian 27.0x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 4.1x 7.2xmedian 4.1x 6.8xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 14.5x 16.4xmedian 14.5x 12.1xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -25.5xmedian 23.7x 23.2xmedian 23.7x 12.9xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x 6.0xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 10.67median 2.07 2.33median 2.07 1.93median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRTKIMSKT
Revenue $1.34B $2.19B $612.31M
Operating income $638.97M $788.44M –
Net income $446.74M $613.68M $246.96M
Free cash flow -$371.04M $681.88M $323.28M
EPS (diluted) $4.97 $0.86 $2.13
Cash & equivalents $107.25M $700.38M $176.88M
Total debt $19.28B $33.34B $1.62B
Shares (diluted) 86.18M 671.96M 115.73M
Enterprise value $8.98B $14.61B $3.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRTKIMSKT
P/E 21.9x 27.5x 16.9x
P/FCF -25.5x 23.2x 12.9x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x 13.4x 7.0x
P/S 7.1x 7.2x 6.8x
P/B 2.8x 1.5x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 1.5x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 13.7x 16.4x 12.1x
EV/EBIT 22.1x 30.3x 19.0x
EV/Revenue 10.6x 10.9x 9.2x
EV/FCF -38.0x 35.0x 17.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.4x 20.2x 9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 10.67 2.33 1.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRTKIMSKT
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.0% 4.4% 11.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 7.5% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.5% 8.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 8.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.7% 1.3% 21.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 14.2% 12.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.3% 2.9% 19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 11.8% 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.3% 10.7% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 5.0% 10.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -323.9% 44.6% 63.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.8% 17.0% 10.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRTKIMSKT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 77.2% 66.4% 75.4%
Operating margin 47.9% 36.0% –
Pretax margin 33.4% 22.9% 36.4%
Net margin 32.1% 26.4% 40.3%
FCF margin -27.8% 31.2% 52.8%
Operating cash flow margin 47.3% 53.9% 97.5%
Return on equity 13.1% 5.9% 18.9%
Return on assets 4.9% 3.1% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – 4.2% –
Return on capital employed – 4.0% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.9x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.5% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRTKIMSKT
Debt / assets 52.6% 43.6% 56.6%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.8x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 5.5x 3.1x
Debt / FCF -12.9x 12.8x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.1% 48.0% 75.5%
Equity / assets 37.9% 52.0% 24.5%
Interest coverage 3.3x 2.3x 4.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – 16.3x –
Cash ratio – 10.5x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRTKIMSKT
Dividend yield 4.2% 4.5% 3.3%
Net buyback yield -0.6% 1.1% -1.2%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 5.5% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 118.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 106.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRTKIMSKT
Forward P/E 24.8xFY2026 29.5xFY2026 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.39FY2026 $0.80FY2026 $1.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 +9.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -31.2% +8.7% +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.28BFY2026 $2.12BFY2026 $638.96MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% +4.5% -10.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRTKIMSKT
Held by institutions 98.5% 99.4% 93.8%
Institutions holding 621 693 361
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.4% +1.8% +2.8%
Institutions buying 363 369 172
Institutions selling 162 201 122
Buyers to sellers 2.24 1.84 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRTKIMSKT
FRT 1.00 0.74 0.63
KIM 0.74 1.00 0.67
SKT 0.63 0.67 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRT, KIM and SKT?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.42B, Kimco Realty (KIM) $15.85B, Tanger (SKT) $4.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, FRT, KIM and SKT?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 22.0x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 27.5x, Tanger (SKT) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is cheapest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 24.8x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 29.5x, Tanger (SKT) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.0%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +4.4%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.1%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 26.4%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tanger (SKT) returned the most: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +7.9%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +6.2%, Tanger (SKT) +9.7%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -2.1%/yr, Kimco Realty (KIM) +0.6%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +15.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 0.00%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 0.05%, Tanger (SKT) 0.00%. Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Tanger (SKT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.9%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.1%, Tanger (SKT) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRT, KIM and SKT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.