FRT vs BPYPP vs MAC Stock Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust, Brookfield Property Partners and Macerich Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MAC Macerich Co
$24.38 +7.6% 1M +35.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.63B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
0.03%
Retail REITs Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brookfield Property Partners leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Property Partners 4, Federal Realty Investment Trust 3, Macerich 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRTBPYPPMACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.45B $14.37B $6.63B BPYPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.1x -56.3x -39.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.0x 11.2x — BPYPP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.0% -9.5% +1.3% FRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.1% -3.6% -16.8% FRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% -6.9% BPYPP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 6.9x -31.9x MAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.9% +0.3% +35.3% MAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.8%/yr -10.2%/yr +6.4%/yr MAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.9% 21.1% 29.6% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 52/100 15/100 BPYPP

Percentile Scorecard

FRTBPYPPMAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRTBPYPPMAC
Valuation 17 #120 of 145 92 #13 of 145 1 #143 of 145
Growth 50 #72 of 142 67 #48 of 142 32 #97 of 142
Profitability 84 #23 of 136 18 #112 of 136 9 #124 of 136
Financial Health 45 #77 of 139 51 #69 of 139 22 #109 of 139
Shareholder Returns 23 #101 of 131 33 #88 of 131 9 #119 of 131
Overall 44 52 15
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • BPYPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • MAC ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRTBPYPPMACSPY
1 month -1.1%-0.3%+7.6% -0.8%
3 months -14.0%-6.6%-6.7% +3.5%
6 months -1.7%-6.8%+12.9% +7.0%
Year to date +8.4%+2.9%+32.1% +12.2%
1 year +7.9%+0.3%+35.3% +13.0%
3 years +26.1%+30.6%+151.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +8.1%+9.3%+35.9% +23.1%
5 years -8.8%-41.5%+36.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.8%-10.2%+6.4% +11.0%
10 years -25.3%—-67.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year -2.9%—-10.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFRTBPYPPMACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.9%21.1%29.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.3%19.9%32.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.400.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.470.011.19 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-56.4%-65.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.0%-10.1%-8.1% -1.8%
52-week high $127.13$16.70$26.52 $779.14
52-week low $94.87$14.38$16.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRTBPYPPMAC
P/E now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 27.4x -56.5xmedian 27.4x -39.4xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 4.2x 2.0xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 14.2x 10.6xmedian 14.2x -79.7xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -25.6xmedian 23.2x —median 23.2x -37.2xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.3x 0.3xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 10.73median 2.11 -1.36median 2.11 2.58median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRTBPYPPMAC
Revenue $1.34B $7.17B $1.01B
Gross profit – – $595.32M
Operating income $638.97M – -$522.95M
Net income $446.74M -$113.00M -$172.33M
Free cash flow -$371.04M – -$186.19M
EPS (diluted) $4.97 $-0.27 $-0.62
Cash & equivalents $107.25M $1.49B $227.03M
Total debt $19.28B $28.73B $4.85B
Shares (diluted) 86.18M 960.29M 273.72M
Enterprise value $9.01B $7.03B $5.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRTBPYPPMAC
P/E 22.0x -56.5x -39.4x
P/FCF -25.6x – -37.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x – 22.6x
P/S 7.1x 2.0x 6.9x
P/B 2.8x 0.3x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 0.3x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 13.7x 10.6x -79.7x
EV/EBIT 22.2x 11.5x -22.1x
EV/Revenue 10.6x 5.8x 11.5x
EV/FCF -38.2x – -62.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.4x – 37.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 10.73 -1.36 2.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRTBPYPPMAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.0% -9.5% 1.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% -4.1% 5.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.5% – -5.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% – -8.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.7% 83.2% 59.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 62.1% -25.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.3% 63.1% 61.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 41.4% -15.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.3% – -2.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.8% – -5.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -323.9% – 26.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.8% – -46.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRTBPYPPMAC
Gross margin – – 59.2%
EBITDA margin 77.2% 55.0% -14.4%
Operating margin 47.9% – -52.0%
Pretax margin 33.4% 2.7% -52.0%
Net margin 32.1% -3.6% -16.8%
FCF margin -27.8% – -18.5%
Operating cash flow margin 47.3% – 30.5%
Return on equity 13.1% -0.3% -6.4%
Return on assets 4.9% -0.1% -2.1%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% -6.9%
Return on capital employed – 4.1% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x – -1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRTBPYPPMAC
Debt / assets 52.6% 28.1% 56.9%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.7x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 6.9x -31.9x
Debt / FCF -12.9x – -26.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.1% 58.3% 65.9%
Equity / assets 37.9% 41.7% 34.1%
Interest coverage 3.3x 1.1x –
Current ratio – 0.3x –
Quick ratio – 0.3x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRTBPYPPMAC
Dividend yield 4.2% 10.9% 2.8%
Net buyback yield -0.6% -10.2% -8.5%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 0.7% -5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -111.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -103.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRTBPYPPMAC
Forward P/E 25.0xFY2026 11.2xFY2023 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.38FY2026 $1.34FY2023 $-0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -31.5% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.28BFY2026 $7.07BFY2023 $969.19MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 – -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% – +13.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRTBPYPPMAC
Held by institutions 98.5% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 621 – 350
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.4% – +19.5%
Institutions buying 363 – 220
Institutions selling 162 – 79
Buyers to sellers 2.24 – 2.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRTBPYPPMAC
FRT 1.00 0.09 0.58
BPYPP 0.09 1.00 0.11
MAC 0.58 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRT, BPYPP and MAC?

Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.45B, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) $14.37B, Macerich (MAC) $6.63B.

Which company is growing faster?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.0%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -9.5%, Macerich (MAC) +1.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has the highest net margin (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.1%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -3.6%, Macerich (MAC) -16.8%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) leads (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 0.0%, Macerich (MAC) -6.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Macerich (MAC) returned the most: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +7.9%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) +0.3%, Macerich (MAC) +35.3%. Over five years, Macerich (MAC) compounded fastest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -1.8%/yr, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -10.2%/yr, Macerich (MAC) +6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 0.00%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 0.00%, Macerich (MAC) 0.03%. Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.9%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 21.1%, Macerich (MAC) 29.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRT, BPYPP and MAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.