FROG vs CRWV vs QTWO Stock Comparison

JFrog, CoreWeave and Q2 Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FROG JFrog Ltd
$100.62 +9.0% 1M +108.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.14B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$599.96M
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
2 wins
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.
$54.24 -37.6% 1M -56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$30.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.59B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
2 wins
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.
$69.38 +24.6% 1M +13.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.36B
P/E
47.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$846.20M
Div. yield
–
Digital Banking Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Q2 Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Q2 Holdings 5, CoreWeave 2, JFrog 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFROGCRWVQTWOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.14B $30.42B $4.36B CRWV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -275.4x -15.8x 47.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 107.0x — 25.0x QTWO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.4% +115.3% +13.9% CRWV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.3% -25.4% 10.9% QTWO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -1.2% 10.3% QTWO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +108.3% -56.0% +13.4% FROG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.4%/yr — -2.8%/yr FROG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.1% 95.9% 44.5% QTWO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 49/100 70/100 QTWO

Percentile Scorecard

FROGCRWVQTWO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFROGCRWVQTWO
Valuation 41 #74 of 124 65 #14 of 38 58 #42 of 98
Growth 80 #23 of 113 57 #16 of 36 87 #13 of 94
Profitability 57 #48 of 110 52 #17 of 34 85 #14 of 90
Financial Health 72 #37 of 129 41 #23 of 38 69 #33 of 105
Shareholder Returns 45 #38 of 68 29 #16 of 22 53 #30 of 62
Overall 59 49 70
  • FROG ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CRWV ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • QTWO ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFROGCRWVQTWOSPY
1 month +9.0%-37.6%+24.6% -1.0%
3 months +25.5%-24.5%+27.1% +2.9%
6 months +122.4%-50.8%+40.3% +6.4%
Year to date +61.1%-24.3%-3.9% +11.4%
1 year +108.3%-56.0%+13.4% +13.1%
3 years +337.1%—+119.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +63.6%—+29.9% +21.5%
5 years +185.4%—-13.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +23.4%—-2.8% +10.9%
10 years ——+141.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+9.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFROGCRWVQTWOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.1%95.9%44.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.7%92.1%42.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.403.640.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.44-0.580.30 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-70.5%-76.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.3%-61.2%-8.1% -2.5%
52-week high $104.03$139.93$75.49 $779.14
52-week low $34.75$54.24$42.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFROGCRWVQTWO
P/E now vs peer median -278.1xmedian 37.4x -15.5xmedian 29.1x 47.1xmedian 21.5x
P/S now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 4.4x 3.9xmedian 4.5x 5.1xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -247.2xmedian 35.0x 7.2xmedian 21.5x 26.6xmedian 15.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 73.0xmedian 27.2x -2.2xmedian 17.3x 20.3xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 3.4x 5.9xmedian 3.9x 6.7xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median -11.81median 1.27 —median 0.33 1.08median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFROGCRWVQTWO
Revenue $599.96M $7.59B $846.20M
Gross profit $467.14M $5.12B $482.24M
Operating income -$69.09M -$230.74M $84.90M
Net income -$44.07M -$1.93B $91.99M
Free cash flow $169.70M -$13.66B $213.25M
R&D $210.17M – $162.56M
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $-3.50 $1.41
Cash & equivalents $96.69M $5.52B $99.92M
Total debt – – $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 121.82M 551.00M 65.42M
Enterprise value $9.22B $17.51B $2.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFROGCRWVQTWO
P/E -278.1x -15.5x 47.1x
P/FCF 73.0x -2.2x 20.3x
P/Operating cash flow 70.2x 4.3x 19.1x
P/S 20.6x 3.9x 5.1x
P/B 12.9x 5.9x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 13.3x 6.3x 7.6x
EV/EBITDA -247.2x 7.2x 26.6x
EV/EBIT -167.3x -121.4x 49.7x
EV/Revenue 19.3x 3.7x 5.0x
EV/FCF 68.1x -2.1x 19.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 65.6x 4.1x 18.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -11.81 – 1.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFROGCRWVQTWO
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.4% 115.3% 13.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.3% – 12.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.3% 94.9% 23.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.4% – 19.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.7% -204.2% 3,719%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.6% – 41.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 48.9% -89.8% 1,783%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.0% – 45.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% -50.8% 1,905%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.5% – 43.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 983.6% 26.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% – 49.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.3% -72.1% 23.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 89.2% – 54.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFROGCRWVQTWO
Gross margin 77.9% 67.4% 57.0%
EBITDA margin -7.8% 51.2% 18.7%
Operating margin -11.5% -3.0% 10.0%
Pretax margin -6.8% -25.3% 11.5%
Net margin -7.3% -25.4% 10.9%
FCF margin 28.3% -179.9% 25.2%
Operating cash flow margin 29.4% 91.1% 26.7%
Return on equity -4.7% -39.4% 14.7%
Return on assets -3.1% -2.9% 8.3%
Return on invested capital – -1.2% 10.3%
Return on capital employed -7.2% -0.5% 10.0%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.0x -3.6x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 26.8% 8.2% 10.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFROGCRWVQTWO
Debt / assets – 4.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.5x –
Debt / FCF – -0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 35.5% 93.5% 33.6%
Equity / assets 64.5% 6.5% 66.4%
Interest coverage – – 17.8x
Current ratio 2.1x 0.5x 0.9x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.7x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 14.32 0.09 8.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFROGCRWVQTWO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% -10.0% 2.6%
Shareholder yield -0.2% -10.0% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFROGCRWVQTWO
Forward P/E 107.0xFY2026 – 25.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.94FY2026 $-3.83FY2026 $2.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 – +8.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% – +30.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $669.80MFY2026 $13.22BFY2026 $850.92MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2026 +157.7%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +112.7% +17.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFROGCRWVQTWO
Held by institutions 92.7% 72.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 409 962 328
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +27.1% +4.9%
Institutions buying 252 690 180
Institutions selling 116 171 109
Buyers to sellers 2.17 4.04 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FROGCRWVQTWO
FROG 1.00 0.21 0.36
CRWV 0.21 1.00 -0.05
QTWO 0.36 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FROG, CRWV and QTWO?

CoreWeave (CRWV) is the largest by market capitalisation: JFrog (FROG) $12.14B, CoreWeave (CRWV) $30.42B, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) $4.36B.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreWeave (CRWV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JFrog (FROG) +26.4%, CoreWeave (CRWV) +115.3%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +13.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Q2 Holdings (QTWO) has the highest net margin (JFrog (FROG) -7.3%, CoreWeave (CRWV) -25.4%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 10.9%). On return on invested capital, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) leads (CoreWeave (CRWV) -1.2%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 10.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year JFrog (FROG) returned the most: JFrog (FROG) +108.3%, CoreWeave (CRWV) -56.0%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +13.4%. Over five years, JFrog (FROG) compounded fastest (JFrog (FROG) +23.4%/yr, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) -2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) has been the steadiest (JFrog (FROG) 75.1%, CoreWeave (CRWV) 95.9%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 44.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FROG, CRWV and QTWO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.