FRFHF vs CB vs MKL Stock Comparison

Fairfax Financial Holdings, Chubb and Markel Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CB Chubb Ltd
$356.74 +7.0% 1M +26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$137.18B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$61.80B
Div. yield
0.01%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
5 wins
MKL Markel Group Inc.
$1,875.12 +8.5% 1M -0.2% 1Y
Market cap
$23.34B
P/E
10.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.51B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Chubb leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Chubb 5, Fairfax Financial Holdings 5, Markel 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRFHFCBMKLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.54B $137.18B $23.34B CB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.5x 12.3x 10.2x FRFHF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x 11.6x 18.8x FRFHF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.0% +8.0% +3.5% FRFHF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% 18.1% 14.7% CB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -9.6% 10.6% MKL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% FRFHF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.0% +26.5% -0.2% CB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.2%/yr +13.4%/yr +7.6%/yr FRFHF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.6% 19.5% 19.9% CB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 53/100 43/100 CB

Percentile Scorecard

FRFHFCBMKL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRFHFCBMKL
Valuation 41 #71 of 119 36 #76 of 119 64 #43 of 119
Growth 37 #73 of 115 56 #51 of 115 11 #103 of 115
Profitability 29 #81 of 113 59 #47 of 113 55 #51 of 113
Financial Health 78 #26 of 114 56 #51 of 114 63 #43 of 114
Shareholder Returns 16 #90 of 107 58 #46 of 107 21 #85 of 107
Overall 40 53 43
  • FRFHF ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • CB ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MKL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRFHFCBMKLSPY
1 month +12.1%+7.0%+8.5% -0.8%
3 months +4.9%-0.6%-7.0% +3.5%
6 months +2.1%+9.9%-1.1% +7.0%
Year to date -7.3%+14.3%-12.8% +12.2%
1 year +7.0%+26.5%-0.2% +13.0%
3 years +118.7%+71.1%+30.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.8%+19.6%+9.4% +23.1%
5 years +334.4%+87.5%+44.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +34.2%+13.4%+7.6% +11.0%
10 years +234.4%+180.9%+110.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.8%+10.9%+7.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFRFHFCBMKLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.6%19.5%19.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.9%18.1%21.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.24-0.410.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.311.36-0.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -20.9%-20.0%-28.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-2.0%-14.5% -1.8%
52-week high $1,916.53$364.00$2,191.90 $779.14
52-week low $1,529.40$275.58$1,714.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRFHFCBMKL
P/E now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 10.6x 12.4xmedian 10.6x 10.3xmedian 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.4x 2.2xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 7.6x —median 7.6x —median 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2,066xmedian 8.6x 8.9xmedian 8.6x 11.0xmedian 8.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 5.66median 0.52 0.46median 0.52 1.20median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRFHFCBMKL
Revenue $134.78B $61.80B $15.51B
Gross profit – $35.75B $10.63B
Operating income – -$11.77B $3.09B
Net income $5.03B $11.51B $2.32B
Free cash flow -$26.00M $15.38B $2.12B
EPS (diluted) $217.11 $28.59 $181.44
Cash & equivalents – $2.75B $3.42B
Total debt – $18.54B $4.37B
Shares (diluted) 23.08M 391.25M 12.59M
Enterprise value $37.54B $83.76B -$43.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRFHFCBMKL
P/E 7.6x 12.4x 10.3x
P/FCF -2,066x 8.9x 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow -1,648x 8.9x 10.0x
P/S 0.4x 2.2x 1.5x
P/B 1.7x 1.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.8x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 5.9x – –
EV/EBIT 6.3x -12.1x 3.5x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.3x 0.7x
EV/FCF -2,066x 9.3x 5.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -1,648x 9.3x 4.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.66 0.46 1.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRFHFCBMKL
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.0% 8.0% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 75.1% 10.0% 1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 19.6% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 25.7% -7.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% 2.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.7% 21.5% 0.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.7% 25.7% 4.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.4% 25.5% 5.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 27.1% 8.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -100.9% 9.8% 2.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.3% 12.3% -6.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.8% 9.8% 3.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 75.1% 12.3% -6.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRFHFCBMKL
Gross margin – 57.8% 68.5%
EBITDA margin 6.7% – –
Operating margin – -19.0% 19.9%
Pretax margin 4.7% 23.1% 19.1%
Net margin 3.7% 18.1% 14.7%
FCF margin 0.0% 24.9% 13.7%
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% 24.9% 15.0%
Return on equity 24.7% 14.3% 12.5%
Return on assets 7.0% 4.1% 3.3%
Return on invested capital – -9.6% 10.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.3x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRFHFCBMKL
Debt / assets – 6.6% 6.1%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 1.2x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 71.6% 71.3% 73.3%
Equity / assets 28.4% 28.7% 26.7%
Interest coverage 10.0x -14.7x 15.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRFHFCBMKL
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 3.0% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 4.1% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.7% 13.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -2,077% 10.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -18.8% 4.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.9% 3.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRFHFCBMKL
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 11.6xFY2026 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $182.77FY2026 $30.86FY2026 $99.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.5%FY2026 +24.5%FY2026 -13.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +2.1% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.74BFY2026 $61.37BFY2026 $15.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.3%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 -3.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.8% +6.9% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRFHFCBMKL
Held by institutions 0.3% 89.7% 76.8%
Institutions holding 17 2,149 926
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.0% -0.8% -0.2%
Institutions buying 7 1,014 424
Institutions selling 1 803 315
Buyers to sellers 7.00 1.26 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRFHFCBMKL
FRFHF 1.00 0.23 0.28
CB 0.23 1.00 0.55
MKL 0.28 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRFHF, CB and MKL?

Chubb (CB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) $37.54B, Chubb (CB) $137.18B, Markel (MKL) $23.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, FRFHF, CB and MKL?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 7.5x, Chubb (CB) 12.3x, Markel (MKL) 10.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) is cheapest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 9.7x, Chubb (CB) 11.6x, Markel (MKL) 18.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +10.0%, Chubb (CB) +8.0%, Markel (MKL) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chubb (CB) has the highest net margin (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 3.7%, Chubb (CB) 18.1%, Markel (MKL) 14.7%). On return on invested capital, Markel (MKL) leads (Chubb (CB) -9.6%, Markel (MKL) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chubb (CB) returned the most: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +7.0%, Chubb (CB) +26.5%, Markel (MKL) -0.2%. Over five years, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) compounded fastest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +34.2%/yr, Chubb (CB) +13.4%/yr, Markel (MKL) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) has the highest dividend yield: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 0.01%, Chubb (CB) 0.01%, Markel (MKL) 0.00%. Markel (MKL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chubb (CB) has been the steadiest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 22.6%, Chubb (CB) 19.5%, Markel (MKL) 19.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRFHF, CB and MKL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chubb (CB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.