FORTY vs KD vs PWR Stock Comparison

Formula Systems (1985), Kyndryl Holdings and Quanta Services Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
$13.91 +23.3% 1M -51.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.03B
P/E
35.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.97B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
1 win
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$635.18 -2.6% 1M +41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.45B
P/E
56.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.29B
Div. yield
0.07%
Utility Construction Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 5, Formula Systems (1985) 5, Kyndryl Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORTYKDPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.87B $3.03B $95.45B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x 35.3x 56.7x FORTY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.1x 40.0x KD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.8% -0.6% +37.1% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.6% 0.6% — FORTY
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% 1.2% — FORTY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 12.44% — 0.07% FORTY
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.6% -51.0% +41.6% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr -15.1%/yr +39.3%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.3% 95.2% 45.2% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 86/100 53/100 46/100 FORTY

Percentile Scorecard

FORTYKDPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORTYKDPWR
Valuation 96 #3 of 50 67 #17 of 50 20 #42 of 52
Growth 91 #5 of 45 59 #19 of 45 78 #9 of 37
Profitability 87 #6 of 40 44 #23 of 40 72 #11 of 37
Financial Health 58 #26 of 60 7 #56 of 60 41 #34 of 57
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 28 89 #4 of 28 19 #22 of 27
Overall 86 53 46
  • FORTY ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • KD ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORTYKDPWRSPY
1 month +6.1%+23.3%-2.6% +0.7%
3 months +15.2%+2.9%-3.5% +3.7%
6 months -7.9%+0.7%-12.7% +7.1%
Year to date -27.0%-47.6%+50.5% +12.8%
1 year -14.6%-51.0%+41.6% +11.9%
3 years +112.1%-2.2%+285.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +28.5%-0.8%+56.8% +22.8%
5 years +12.5%-55.8%+423.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +2.4%-15.1%+39.3% +10.9%
10 years +216.0%—+2,124.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +12.2%—+36.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFORTYKDPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.3%95.2%45.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 84.5%123.1%42.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.630.621.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.540.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.5%-75.6%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.0%-51.9%-19.1% -1.2%
52-week high $190.56$28.92$785.24 $779.14
52-week low $102.01$10.59$413.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORTYKDPWR
P/E now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 17.5x 35.3xmedian 17.5x 56.7xmedian 28.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 2.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.4x 4.0xmedian 10.4x —median 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 13.3x 20.5xmedian 13.3x 42.8xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.5x 2.6xmedian 1.5x 9.0xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.28 1.24median 1.28 1.71median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORTYKDPWR
Revenue $2.93B $14.97B $37.29B
Gross profit $580.29M $3.27B $5.88B
Operating income $249.80M $203.00M $2.55B
Net income $697.91M $87.00M –
Free cash flow – $148.00M –
R&D $21.15M – –
EPS (diluted) $39.97 $0.39 $11.04
Cash & equivalents $863.79M $2.11B $2.32B
Total debt $642.43M $4.85B –
Shares (diluted) 15.79M 220.60M 152.44M
Enterprise value -$1.03B -$4.30B $95.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORTYKDPWR
P/E 3.0x 35.3x 56.7x
P/FCF – 20.5x 42.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 4.0x –
P/S 0.6x 0.2x 2.6x
P/B 1.1x 2.6x 9.0x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 3.0x 12.8x
EV/EBITDA – 4.0x –
EV/EBIT 4.7x 28.4x –
EV/Revenue 0.4x 0.4x 2.6x
EV/FCF – 39.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 1.24 1.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORTYKDPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.8% -0.6% 37.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.9% -4.1% 24.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.3% 4.3% 42.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 7.5% 27.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 26.5% 851.9% 61.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 29.0% 33.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 255.1% -70.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 28.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 700.9% -68.3% 64.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 112.1% 28.4% 33.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -12.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 36.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -38.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORTYKDPWR
Gross margin 19.8% 21.8% –
EBITDA margin – 9.8% –
Operating margin 8.5% 1.4% –
Pretax margin 7.1% 1.7% –
Net margin 21.6% 0.6% –
FCF margin – 1.0% –
Operating cash flow margin – 5.1% –
Return on equity 40.1% 7.1% 16.8%
Return on assets 19.5% 0.7% 5.6%
Return on invested capital 10.1% 1.2% –
Return on capital employed 11.2% 3.2% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.2x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 8.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORTYKDPWR
Debt / assets 4.8% 40.3% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 4.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x –
Debt / FCF – 32.8x –
Liabilities / assets 52.8% 90.3% 67.6%
Equity / assets 47.2% 9.7% 32.4%
Interest coverage – 2.0x –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.4x –
Altman Z-score – 1.15 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORTYKDPWR
Dividend yield 12.4% – 0.1%
Net buyback yield – 10.1% –
Shareholder yield 12.4% 10.1% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORTYKDPWR
Forward P/E – 7.1xFY2026 40.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.95FY2026 $15.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +33.6%FY2026 +47.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +30.8% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $15.74BFY2026 $40.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.3%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -4.0% +9.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORTYKDPWR
Held by institutions – 86.9% 88.9%
Institutions holding – 674 1,921
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.0% +13.5%
Institutions buying – 256 972
Institutions selling – 211 705
Buyers to sellers – 1.21 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORTYKDPWR
FORTY 1.00 0.03 0.05
KD 0.03 1.00 -0.13
PWR 0.05 -0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FORTY, KD and PWR?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) $1.87B, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) $3.03B, Quanta Services (PWR) $95.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, FORTY, KD and PWR?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 3.0x, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 35.3x, Quanta Services (PWR) 56.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) is cheapest (Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 7.1x, Quanta Services (PWR) 40.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +24.8%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -0.6%, Quanta Services (PWR) +37.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) has the highest net margin (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 21.6%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 0.6%). On return on invested capital, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) leads (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 10.1%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) -14.6%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -51.0%, Quanta Services (PWR) +41.6%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +2.4%/yr, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -15.1%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +39.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) has the highest dividend yield: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 12.44%, Quanta Services (PWR) 0.07%. Kyndryl Holdings (KD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 55.3%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 95.2%, Quanta Services (PWR) 45.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FORTY, KD and PWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.