FOR vs ILAL vs NTPIF Stock Comparison

Forestar, International Land Alliance and Nam Tai Property Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FOR Forestar Group Inc.
$26.25 -0.9% 1M +0.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.32B
P/E
7.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
NTPIF Nam Tai Property Inc.
$4.40 -1.8% 1M +2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$266.41M
P/E
2,419x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Forestar leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Forestar 3, International Land Alliance 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORILALNTPIFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.32B $5.62M $266.41M FOR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.7x — 2,419x FOR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.6x 1.2x — ILAL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.7% +746.7% +2.3% ILAL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.8%/yr +9.7%/yr -29.6%/yr ILAL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.6% 425.4% 36.7% FOR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

FORILALNTPIF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORILALNTPIF
Valuation 92 #4 of 39 – 16 #33 of 39
Growth 55 #15 of 32 – –
Profitability 71 #9 of 29 – –
Financial Health 57 #17 of 38 – 30 #27 of 38
Shareholder Returns 23 #11 of 14 – –
Overall 60 – –
  • FOR ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • ILAL ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • NTPIF ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORILALNTPIFSPY
1 month -0.9%-68.2%-1.8% -0.2%
3 months -10.6%-69.8%-7.2% +3.9%
6 months -6.6%-81.9%-12.0% +8.2%
Year to date +6.6%+452.2%+2.3% +12.9%
1 year +0.7%+746.7%+2.3% +12.3%
3 years +12.2%+746.7%+7.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +3.9%+103.9%+2.3% +23.3%
5 years +32.7%+58.7%-82.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +5.8%+9.7%-29.6% +10.9%
10 years +138.0%—-42.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.1%—-5.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFORILALNTPIFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.6%425.4%36.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.9%182.5%49.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.82-0.24-0.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.021.760.06 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.7%-96.7%-96.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.9%-88.5%-24.8% -1.2%
52-week high $31.98$11.00$5.85 $779.14
52-week low $23.09$0.14$3.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORILALNTPIF
P/E now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 7.9x —median 7.9x 2,419xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 4.7x —median 4.7x 5.6xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 6.2x —median 6.2x -11.1xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x 1.5xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.68median 0.32 —median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORILALNTPIF
Revenue $1.72B – –
Gross profit $368.90M – –
Operating income $213.60M – –
Net income $170.50M – –
Free cash flow $282.90M – –
EPS (diluted) $3.32 – –
Cash & equivalents $394.90M – $43.50M
Total debt $793.80M $34.32M $629.83M
Shares (diluted) 51.30M 3.75M 60.90M
Enterprise value -$28.32M $5.62M $85.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORILALNTPIF
P/E 7.9x – 2,419x
P/FCF 4.7x – -11.1x
P/Operating cash flow 4.7x – –
P/S 0.8x – 5.6x
P/B 0.7x – 1.5x
P/Tangible book 0.7x – 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x – –
EV/EBIT 8.1x – –
EV/Revenue 1.0x – –
EV/FCF 6.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.68 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORILALNTPIF
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 4.9% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 4.1% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 184.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.6% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 183.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORILALNTPIF
Gross margin 21.4% – –
EBITDA margin 12.6% – –
Operating margin 12.4% – –
Pretax margin 13.1% – –
Net margin 9.9% – –
FCF margin 16.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 16.5% – –
Return on equity 9.3% – –
Return on assets 5.3% – –
Return on invested capital 6.1% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORILALNTPIF
Debt / assets 24.6% – 36.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – –
Debt / FCF 2.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 42.3% – 61.6%
Equity / assets 57.7% – 38.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – 1.2x
Quick ratio – – 0.7x
Cash ratio – – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORILALNTPIF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORILALNTPIF
Forward P/E 8.6xFY2026 1.2xFY2023 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.06FY2026 $1.02FY2023 –
EPS growth, next FY -7.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -12.4% +827.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.77BFY2026 $8.48MFY2023 –
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +250.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORILALNTPIF
Held by institutions 36.6% – 9.7%
Institutions holding 185 – 2
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% – –
Institutions buying 97 – 0
Institutions selling 49 – 0
Buyers to sellers 1.98 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORILALNTPIF
FOR 1.00 0.20 0.04
ILAL 0.20 1.00 0.02
NTPIF 0.04 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FOR, ILAL and NTPIF?

Forestar (FOR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Forestar (FOR) $1.32B, International Land Alliance (ILAL) $5.62M, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) $266.41M.

Which stock is cheaper, FOR, ILAL and NTPIF?

Forestar (FOR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Forestar (FOR) 7.7x, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 2,419x). On next year's consensus earnings, International Land Alliance (ILAL) is cheapest (Forestar (FOR) 8.6x, International Land Alliance (ILAL) 1.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year International Land Alliance (ILAL) returned the most: Forestar (FOR) +0.7%, International Land Alliance (ILAL) +746.7%, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) +2.3%. Over five years, International Land Alliance (ILAL) compounded fastest (Forestar (FOR) +5.8%/yr, International Land Alliance (ILAL) +9.7%/yr, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -29.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Forestar (FOR) has been the steadiest (Forestar (FOR) 33.6%, International Land Alliance (ILAL) 425.4%, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FOR, ILAL and NTPIF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Forestar (FOR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.