FOFA vs GLDM vs SLV Stock Comparison

Family Office Of America, World Gold Trust and iShares Silver Trust Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLDM World Gold Trust
$80.34 -5.3% 1M +1.7% 1Y
Market cap
$27.50B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Asset Management Financial Services
3 wins
SLV iShares Silver Trust
$49.16 -15.4% 1M +15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$19.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Asset Management Financial Services

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

World Gold Trust leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (World Gold Trust 3, Family Office Of America 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFOFAGLDMSLVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.53M $27.50B $19.05B GLDM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -176.4x 8.7x -48.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +377,323.4% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +246.2% +1.7% +15.9% FOFA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.9%/yr +17.6%/yr +17.2%/yr GLDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 287.4% 28.6% 65.8% GLDM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

FOFAGLDMSLV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFOFAGLDMSLV
Valuation 33 #121 of 181 91 #17 of 181 –
Growth 96 #6 of 111 – –
Profitability 27 #94 of 129 – –
Financial Health 69 #51 of 164 – –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 56 – –
  • FOFA ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • GLDM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • SLV ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFOFAGLDMSLVSPY
1 month +4.7%-5.3%-15.4% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+0.9%-4.9% +3.9%
6 months -10.0%-11.6%-25.7% +8.2%
Year to date +221.4%-5.9%-23.7% +12.9%
1 year +246.2%+1.7%+15.9% +12.3%
3 years +60.7%+101.8%+132.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +17.1%+26.4%+32.4% +23.3%
5 years -18.2%+124.7%+120.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.9%+17.6%+17.2% +10.9%
10 years -97.8%—+193.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year -31.6%—+11.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFOFAGLDMSLVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 287.4%28.6%65.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 456.4%31.8%80.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.680.842.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.860.060.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.3%-26.3%-53.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.4%-24.8%-53.4% -1.2%
52-week high $4.60$106.77$105.60 $779.14
52-week low $0.26$77.96$42.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFOFAGLDMSLV
P/E now vs peer median -176.4xmedian 34.2x 8.7xmedian 34.2x -48.5xmedian 34.2x
P/S now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x —median 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.7x —median 11.7x —median 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 140.8xmedian 13.2x —median 13.2x —median 13.2x
P/B now vs peer median 27.6xmedian 1.8x 1.0xmedian 1.8x —median 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -2.44median 0.91 —median 0.91 —median 0.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFOFAGLDMSLV
Revenue $1.31M – –
Operating income -$177.96K – –
Net income -$155.56K $3.12B -$378.20M
Free cash flow $195.50K – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 – –
Cash & equivalents $636.89K – –
Total debt $207.75K – –
Shares (diluted) 30.49M – –
Enterprise value $25.57M -$75.57B $19.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFOFAGLDMSLV
P/E -176.4x 8.7x -48.5x
P/FCF 140.8x – –
P/Operating cash flow 140.8x – –
P/S 21.1x – –
P/B 27.6x 1.0x –
P/Tangible book 58.8x 1.0x –
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -152.3x – –
EV/Revenue 20.8x – –
EV/FCF 138.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 138.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.44 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFOFAGLDMSLV
Revenue growth (1Y) 377,323% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 29.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 38.2% -11.8% -108.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 57.6% 129.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 45.8% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 72.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 246.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 246.8% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFOFAGLDMSLV
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -13.6% – –
Pretax margin -10.9% – –
Net margin -11.9% – –
FCF margin 15.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin 15.0% – –
Return on equity -21.4% 11.0% –
Return on assets -8.6% 10.9% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -14.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue 10.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFOFAGLDMSLV
Debt / assets 7.8% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF 1.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 0.2% –
Equity / assets 37.6% 99.8% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.7x – –
Quick ratio 0.7x – –
Cash ratio 0.5x – –
Altman Z-score 7.50 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFOFAGLDMSLV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFOFAGLDMSLV

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFOFAGLDMSLV
Held by institutions – 51.1% 26.9%
Institutions holding – 909 1,416
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.2% -5.2%
Institutions buying – 513 581
Institutions selling – 262 493
Buyers to sellers – 1.96 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FOFAGLDMSLV
FOFA 1.00 -0.05 -0.10
GLDM -0.05 1.00 0.84
SLV -0.10 0.84 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FOFA, GLDM and SLV?

World Gold Trust (GLDM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Family Office Of America (FOFA) $27.53M, World Gold Trust (GLDM) $27.50B, iShares Silver Trust (SLV) $19.05B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Family Office Of America (FOFA) returned the most: Family Office Of America (FOFA) +246.2%, World Gold Trust (GLDM) +1.7%, iShares Silver Trust (SLV) +15.9%. Over five years, World Gold Trust (GLDM) compounded fastest (Family Office Of America (FOFA) -3.9%/yr, World Gold Trust (GLDM) +17.6%/yr, iShares Silver Trust (SLV) +17.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, World Gold Trust (GLDM) has been the steadiest (Family Office Of America (FOFA) 287.4%, World Gold Trust (GLDM) 28.6%, iShares Silver Trust (SLV) 65.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FOFA, GLDM and SLV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, World Gold Trust (GLDM) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.