FNMA vs UWMC vs ING Stock Comparison

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae, UWM Holdings and Ing Groep Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$482.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.33 -11.5% 1M +34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$96.43B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 4, Ing Groep 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNMAUWMCINGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.76B $482.66M $96.43B ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 109.1x -13.0x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.5x 6.7x 12.1x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.1% +26.1% — UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% -1.0% — FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.8% 6.3% — UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -62.9% -76.1% +34.9% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +36.9%/yr -27.4%/yr +16.4%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.8% 79.6% 27.8% ING
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 37/100 — FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

FNMAUWMCING

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNMAUWMCING
Valuation 54 #78 of 170 21 #135 of 170 –
Growth 86 #24 of 160 16 #135 of 160 –
Profitability 69 #47 of 149 32 #102 of 149 –
Financial Health 6 #149 of 158 18 #130 of 158 22 #159 of 203
Shareholder Returns – 97 #5 of 135 93 #24 of 342
Overall 54 37 –
  • FNMA ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ING ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNMAUWMCINGSPY
1 month -10.2%+13.8%-11.5% -0.8%
3 months -30.4%-24.3%-3.5% +3.5%
6 months -41.1%-62.6%+15.2% +7.0%
Year to date -60.7%-68.0%+15.5% +12.2%
1 year -62.9%-76.1%+34.9% +13.0%
3 years +478.1%-71.9%+156.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +79.5%-34.6%+36.8% +23.1%
5 years +379.5%-79.7%+113.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +36.9%-27.4%+16.4% +11.0%
10 years +145.3%—+148.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.4%—+9.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFNMAUWMCINGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.8%79.6%27.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%89.8%26.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.301.441.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.73-0.961.25 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.7%-89.5%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-77.0%-13.2% -1.8%
52-week high $11.95$6.10$37.26 $779.14
52-week low $3.26$1.00$24.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNMAUWMCING
P/E now vs peer median 109.1xmedian 11.0x -12.7xmedian 11.0x —median 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x —median 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x 14.9xmedian 13.1x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 6.9x -0.5xmedian 6.9x —median 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.7x 2.3xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.54median 0.32 0.25median 0.32 —median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNMAUWMCING
Revenue $29.17B $3.58B –
Net income $15.09B -$104.96M –
Free cash flow $41.31B -$4.92B –
EPS (diluted) $0.04 $-0.11 –
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M $74.19B
Total debt $4.19T $19.23B $21.78B
Shares (diluted) 5.89B 337.53M 2.99B
Enterprise value $24.76B -$1.81B -$447.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNMAUWMCING
P/E 109.1x -12.7x –
P/FCF 0.6x -0.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 0.6x -0.5x –
P/S 0.8x 0.6x –
P/B 0.2x 2.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 0.2x -0.5x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – 14.9x –
EV/EBIT 27.9x 16.8x –
EV/Revenue 144.4x 2.2x –
EV/FCF 102.0x -1.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 102.0x -1.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.54 0.25 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNMAUWMCING
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.1% 26.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.2% 27.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -0.4% -175.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.1% -31.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 22,700% -287.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 200.4% -51.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 485.1% -103.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.8% -18.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 485.1% -100.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.8% -18.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNMAUWMCING
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 14.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 64.8% -3.2% –
Net margin 0.8% -1.0% –
FCF margin 141.6% -137.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 141.6% -135.9% –
Return on equity 13.2% -8.1% –
Return on assets 0.3% -0.6% –
Return on invested capital 2.8% 6.3% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x 46.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNMAUWMCING
Debt / assets 96.7% 33.5% 1.6%
Debt / equity 36.0x 6.1x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.6x –
Debt / FCF 101.4x -1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 97.3% 94.5% 95.3%
Equity / assets 2.7% 5.5% 4.7%
Interest coverage 1.1x 0.8x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNMAUWMCING
Dividend yield – 21.4% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 21.4% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNMAUWMCING
Forward P/E 1.5xFY2026 6.7xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 $0.21FY2026 $2.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 +75.0%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.9% +19.0% +18.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.10BFY2026 $2.23BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.4%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.3% +30.9% +3.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNMAUWMCING
Held by institutions 0.0% 79.7% 4.5%
Institutions holding 25 290 589
Change in shares held, QoQ +58.6% +31.8% -19.0%
Institutions buying 13 213 319
Institutions selling 2 50 154
Buyers to sellers 6.50 4.26 2.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNMAUWMCING
FNMA 1.00 0.04 0.11
UWMC 0.04 1.00 0.12
ING 0.11 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FNMA, UWMC and ING?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $24.76B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $482.66M, Ing Groep (ING) $96.43B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -3.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -62.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.9%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +36.9%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ing Groep (ING) has been the steadiest (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FNMA, UWMC and ING?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.