FNMA vs ING vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae, Ing Groep and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.33 -11.5% 1M +34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$97.23B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$526.54M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 4, Ing Groep 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNMAINGUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.58B $97.23B $526.54M ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 108.3x — -14.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.5x 12.1x 7.4x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.1% — +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% — -1.0% FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.8% — 6.3% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -62.9% +34.9% -76.1% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +36.9%/yr +16.4%/yr -27.4%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.8% 27.8% 79.6% ING
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 — 37/100 FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

FNMAINGUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNMAINGUWMC
Valuation 54 #78 of 170 – 21 #135 of 170
Growth 86 #24 of 160 – 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 69 #47 of 149 – 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 6 #149 of 158 22 #159 of 203 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 93 #24 of 342 97 #5 of 135
Overall 54 – 37
  • FNMA ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ING ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNMAINGUWMCSPY
1 month -10.2%-11.5%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months -30.4%-3.5%-24.3% +3.5%
6 months -41.1%+15.2%-62.6% +7.0%
Year to date -60.7%+15.5%-68.0% +12.2%
1 year -62.9%+34.9%-76.1% +13.0%
3 years +478.1%+156.0%-71.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +79.5%+36.8%-34.6% +23.1%
5 years +379.5%+113.3%-79.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +36.9%+16.4%-27.4% +11.0%
10 years +145.3%+148.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.4%+9.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFNMAINGUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.8%27.8%79.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%26.7%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.301.351.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.731.25-0.96 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.7%-47.4%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-13.2%-77.0% -1.8%
52-week high $11.95$37.26$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $3.26$24.17$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNMAINGUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 109.1xmedian 11.0x —median 12.1x -12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.6x —median 3.4x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x —median 5.0x 14.9xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 6.9x —median 11.0x -0.5xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.54median 0.32 —median 1.36 0.25median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNMAINGUWMC
Revenue $29.17B – $3.58B
Net income $15.09B – -$104.96M
Free cash flow $41.31B – -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $0.04 – $-0.11
Cash & equivalents – $74.19B $498.41M
Total debt $4.19T $21.78B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 5.89B 2.99B 337.53M
Enterprise value $24.58B -$446.23B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNMAINGUWMC
P/E 109.1x – -12.7x
P/FCF 0.6x – -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow 0.6x – -0.5x
P/S 0.8x – 0.6x
P/B 0.2x 1.5x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 1.6x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 14.9x
EV/EBIT 27.9x – 16.8x
EV/Revenue 144.4x – 2.2x
EV/FCF 102.0x – -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 102.0x – -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.54 – 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNMAINGUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.1% – 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.2% – 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -0.4% – -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.1% – -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 22,700% – -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 200.4% – -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 485.1% – -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.8% – -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 485.1% – -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.8% – -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNMAINGUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 64.8% – -3.2%
Net margin 0.8% – -1.0%
FCF margin 141.6% – -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin 141.6% – -135.9%
Return on equity 13.2% – -8.1%
Return on assets 0.3% – -0.6%
Return on invested capital 2.8% – 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x – 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNMAINGUWMC
Debt / assets 96.7% 1.6% 33.5%
Debt / equity 36.0x 0.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF 101.4x – -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 97.3% 95.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 2.7% 4.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage 1.1x – 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNMAINGUWMC
Dividend yield – 4.7% 21.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.7% 21.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNMAINGUWMC
Forward P/E 1.5xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 $2.68FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.9% +18.3% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.10BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.4%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.3% +3.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNMAINGUWMC
Held by institutions 0.0% 4.5% 79.7%
Institutions holding 25 589 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +58.6% -19.0% +31.8%
Institutions buying 13 319 213
Institutions selling 2 154 50
Buyers to sellers 6.50 2.07 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNMAINGUWMC
FNMA 1.00 0.11 0.04
ING 0.11 1.00 0.12
UWMC 0.04 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FNMA, ING and UWMC?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $24.58B, Ing Groep (ING) $97.23B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $526.54M.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -3.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -62.9%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +36.9%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.4%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ing Groep (ING) has been the steadiest (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.8%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FNMA, ING and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.