FLYE vs HTZ vs MBUU Stock Comparison

Fly-E, Hertz Global Holdings and Malibu Boats Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MCFT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLYE Fly-E Group, Inc.
$1.70 +28.8% 1M -76.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.78M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$16.48M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MBUU Malibu Boats, Inc.
$24.75 +8.6% 1M -9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$477.79M
P/E
289.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$914.59M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Malibu Boats leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Malibu Boats 6, Hertz Global Holdings 2, Fly-E 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLYEHTZMBUULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.78M $804.37M $477.79M HTZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.2x -2.6x 289.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 9.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -28.0% +3.4% +13.3% MBUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -67.9% -3.1% 0.2% MBUU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -39.5% 4.0% 0.3% HTZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 5.9x 1.9x FLYE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.2% -66.4% -9.2% MBUU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -42.0%/yr -20.3%/yr MBUU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 197.6% 97.8% 47.2% MBUU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 31/100 62/100 MBUU

Percentile Scorecard

FLYEHTZMBUU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLYEHTZMBUU
Valuation 33 #33 of 49 50 #15 of 29 67 #17 of 49
Growth 25 #37 of 49 44 #15 of 26 8 #45 of 49
Profitability 20 #38 of 47 24 #20 of 26 63 #18 of 47
Financial Health 65 #19 of 53 7 #28 of 30 75 #14 of 53
Shareholder Returns – – 97 #2 of 30
Overall 36 31 62
  • FLYE ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HTZ ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • MBUU ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLYEHTZMBUUSPY
1 month +28.8%+26.3%+8.6% -1.0%
3 months -2.3%+44.9%-15.5% -0.4%
6 months -11.9%-65.1%-3.7% +4.5%
Year to date -74.4%-56.0%-12.3% +12.4%
1 year -76.2%-66.4%-9.2% +13.6%
3 years —-75.8%-46.9% +76.4%
3 years, per year —-37.7%-19.1% +20.8%
5 years —-93.4%-67.9% +63.7%
5 years, per year —-42.0%-20.3% +10.4%
10 years ——+58.5% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+4.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFLYEHTZMBUUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 197.6%97.8%47.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 127.9%101.7%46.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.411.691.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.39-0.68-0.20 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.8%-95.6%-72.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -89.2%-71.1%-28.5% -1.6%
52-week high $15.79$7.81$34.61 $779.14
52-week low $1.27$1.51$21.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLYEHTZMBUU
P/E now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 21.1x -2.6xmedian 23.3x 289.0xmedian 21.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.5x 0.1xmedian 1.5x 0.5xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 9.2x 6.2xmedian 15.4x 12.1xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 8.8x -0.1xmedian 17.8x 11.2xmedian 8.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.0x -1.3xmedian 2.5x 0.9xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.08 0.09median 0.36 -3.89median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLYEHTZMBUU
Revenue $16.48M $8.91B $914.59M
Gross profit $2.70M $3.29B $146.52M
Operating income -$8.47M $719.00M $3.10M
Net income -$11.19M -$279.00M $1.71M
Free cash flow -$10.49M -$10.19B $42.85M
EPS (diluted) $-6.85 $-0.67 $0.09
Cash & equivalents $60.28K $1.30B $74.42M
Total debt $5.95M $18.75B $165.00M
Shares (diluted) 1.63M 418.00M 19.34M
Enterprise value -$384.21K -$4.43B $284.87M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLYEHTZMBUU
P/E -0.2x -2.6x 289.0x
P/FCF -0.3x -0.1x 11.2x
P/Operating cash flow -0.3x 0.6x 7.1x
P/S 0.2x 0.1x 0.5x
P/B 0.2x -1.3x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.2x -0.2x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA -1.1x 6.2x 12.1x
EV/EBIT -1.0x 25.4x 183.4x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.0x 0.6x
EV/FCF -0.8x -1.8x 13.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.0x 12.8x 8.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.09 -3.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLYEHTZMBUU
Revenue growth (1Y) -28.0% 3.4% 13.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.4% -13.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -71.9% 7.3% 1.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.5% -25.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -40.7% 138.5% -85.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -10.2% -72.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -57.1% 89.1% -88.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -31.5% -74.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 67.8% 91.9% -88.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -30.1% -74.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.1% -25.0% 19.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -14.3% -28.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.3% -13.4% 49.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.2% -30.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLYEHTZMBUU
Gross margin 16.4% 36.9% 16.0%
EBITDA margin -46.7% 33.1% 5.1%
Operating margin -51.4% 8.1% 0.3%
Pretax margin -65.0% -2.5% 0.3%
Net margin -67.9% -3.1% 0.2%
FCF margin -63.6% -114.4% 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin -53.1% 16.0% 7.4%
Return on equity -72.3% – 0.3%
Return on assets -40.2% -1.2% 0.2%
Return on invested capital -39.5% 4.0% 0.3%
Return on capital employed -42.6% – 0.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x -5.1x 39.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLYEHTZMBUU
Debt / assets 22.7% 78.5% 16.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x -29.9x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 5.9x 1.9x
Debt / FCF -0.6x -1.8x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 48.4% 102.6% 47.0%
Equity / assets 51.6% -2.6% 53.0%
Interest coverage – 0.8x 0.9x
Current ratio 2.0x – 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.6x – 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score -0.69 – 2.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLYEHTZMBUU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 7.1%
Shareholder yield – – 7.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLYEHTZMBUU
Forward P/E – – 9.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.83FY2026 $2.58FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – – +69.7%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – – +18.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $9.57BFY2026 $1.17BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.6%FY2026 +28.4%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.0% +6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLYEHTZMBUU
Held by institutions – 100.0% 91.4%
Institutions holding – 289 142
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.8% -32.7%
Institutions buying – 150 90
Institutions selling – 88 35
Buyers to sellers – 1.70 2.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLYEHTZMBUU
FLYE 1.00 -0.02 0.04
HTZ -0.02 1.00 0.17
MBUU 0.04 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLYE, HTZ and MBUU?

Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fly-E (FLYE) $2.78M, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) $804.37M, Malibu Boats (MBUU) $477.79M.

Which company is growing faster?

Malibu Boats (MBUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fly-E (FLYE) -28.0%, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) +3.4%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) +13.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Malibu Boats (MBUU) has the highest net margin (Fly-E (FLYE) -67.9%, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) -3.1%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.2%). On return on invested capital, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) leads (Fly-E (FLYE) -39.5%, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) 4.0%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Malibu Boats (MBUU) returned the most: Fly-E (FLYE) -76.2%, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) -66.4%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) -9.2%. Over five years, Malibu Boats (MBUU) compounded fastest (Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) -42.0%/yr, Malibu Boats (MBUU) -20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Malibu Boats (MBUU) has been the steadiest (Fly-E (FLYE) 197.6%, Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ) 97.8%, Malibu Boats (MBUU) 47.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLYE, HTZ and MBUU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Malibu Boats (MBUU) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.