FLX vs GVH vs CHRW Stock Comparison

BingEx, Globavend Holdings and C. H. Robinson Worldwide Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLX BingEx Ltd
$1.47 +5.8% 1M -61.7% 1Y
Market cap
$107.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$558.59M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

C. H. Robinson Worldwide leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (C. H. Robinson Worldwide 4, Globavend Holdings 1, BingEx 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLXGVHCHRWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $107.50M $13.59M $14.94B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -55.3x — 22.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.4x 1.3x 20.8x GVH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.8% — +10.4% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 1.97% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.7% -84.1% -0.4% CHRW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +5.6%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 99.3% 196.8% 48.4% CHRW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 — 34/100 FLX

Percentile Scorecard

FLXGVHCHRW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLXGVHCHRW
Valuation 69 #43 of 136 – 26 #101 of 136
Growth 55 #55 of 122 – 53 #58 of 122
Profitability 24 #88 of 116 – 37 #73 of 116
Financial Health 88 #18 of 143 97 #6 of 143 21 #113 of 143
Shareholder Returns – – 34 #54 of 81
Overall 59 – 34
  • FLX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GVH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLXGVHCHRWSPY
1 month +5.8%-15.7%-13.9% +0.9%
3 months -31.0%0.0%-26.6% +5.9%
6 months -47.1%-75.7%-31.6% +8.5%
Year to date -53.8%-36.8%-20.6% +13.3%
1 year -61.7%-84.1%-0.4% +12.4%
3 years ——+57.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year ——+16.2% +23.5%
5 years ——+31.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year ——+5.6% +11.0%
10 years ——+88.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+6.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFLXGVHCHRWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 99.3%196.8%48.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 113.9%228.4%53.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.991.260.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.62-0.43-0.01 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.6%-99.8%-43.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-84.8%-39.1% -0.9%
52-week high $4.16$5.98$209.42 $779.14
52-week low $0.80$0.78$127.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLXGVHCHRW
P/E now vs peer median -55.3xmedian 16.1x —median 16.1x 22.6xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.6x —median 8.6x —median 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.6x —median 11.6x 26.2xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 9.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 —median 0.80 1.15median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLXGVHCHRW
Revenue $558.59M – $18.22B
Gross profit $60.56M – –
Operating income $5.06M – $884.59M
Net income -$1.71M – $668.81M
R&D $9.48M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 – $5.58
Cash & equivalents $84.66M $7.15M $193.13M
Shares (diluted) 69.52M 14.56M 119.75M
Enterprise value -$276.67M -$4.28M $14.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLXGVHCHRW
P/E -55.3x – 22.6x
P/FCF – – 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow – – 28.0x
P/S 0.2x – 0.8x
P/B 1.0x 1.3x 9.5x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 1.3x 9.5x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -3.6x – –
EV/Revenue 0.0x – 0.8x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – 28.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 1.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLXGVHCHRW
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.8% – 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -0.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -10.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 149.3% – 10.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 15.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 94.4% – 11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 19.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 96.5% – 12.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -39.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -28.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLXGVHCHRW
Gross margin 10.8% – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin 0.9% – –
Pretax margin -0.3% – –
Net margin -0.3% – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – 2.9%
Return on equity -1.5% – –
Return on assets -1.0% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 4.5% – –
Asset turnover 3.3x – 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLXGVHCHRW
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 35.0% 8.9% 75.3%
Equity / assets 65.0% 91.1% 24.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.4x 9.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 2.3x 9.0x –
Cash ratio 2.2x 7.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLXGVHCHRW
Dividend yield – – 2.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLXGVHCHRW
Forward P/E 3.4xFY2026 1.3xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.43FY2026 $0.69FY2026 $6.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +514.3%FY2026 -57.1%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.0% – +19.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $648.80MFY2026 $22.73MFY2026 $18.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.7%FY2026 -3.5%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.6% – +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLXGVHCHRW
Held by institutions – – 100.0%
Institutions holding – – 891
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -1.7%
Institutions buying – – 445
Institutions selling – – 318
Buyers to sellers – – 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLXGVHCHRW
FLX 1.00 -0.04 -0.03
GVH -0.04 1.00 -0.04
CHRW -0.03 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLX, GVH and CHRW?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: BingEx (FLX) $107.50M, Globavend Holdings (GVH) $13.59M, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.94B.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BingEx (FLX) -3.8%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) returned the most: BingEx (FLX) -61.7%, Globavend Holdings (GVH) -84.1%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -0.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 1.97%. BingEx (FLX) and Globavend Holdings (GVH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has been the steadiest (BingEx (FLX) 99.3%, Globavend Holdings (GVH) 196.8%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLX, GVH and CHRW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.