FLX vs CHRW vs CYRX Stock Comparison

BingEx, C. H. Robinson Worldwide and Cryoport Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLX BingEx Ltd
$1.47 +5.8% 1M -61.7% 1Y
Market cap
$107.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$558.59M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
3 wins
CYRX Cryoport, Inc.
$18.64 +7.2% 1M +106.2% 1Y
Market cap
$944.09M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$186.45M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

BingEx leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (BingEx 3, Cryoport 3, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLXCHRWCYRXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $107.50M $14.94B $944.09M CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -55.3x 22.6x -20.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.4x 20.8x — FLX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.8% +10.4% +12.1% CYRX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% — -24.3% FLX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -5.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 16.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.97% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.7% -0.4% +106.2% CYRX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.6%/yr -25.6%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 99.3% 48.4% 46.2% CYRX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 34/100 30/100 FLX

Percentile Scorecard

FLXCHRWCYRX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLXCHRWCYRX
Valuation 69 #43 of 136 26 #101 of 136 4 #130 of 136
Growth 55 #55 of 122 53 #58 of 122 51 #60 of 122
Profitability 24 #88 of 116 37 #73 of 116 10 #105 of 116
Financial Health 88 #18 of 143 21 #113 of 143 63 #54 of 143
Shareholder Returns – 34 #54 of 81 24 #62 of 81
Overall 59 34 30
  • FLX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CYRX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLXCHRWCYRXSPY
1 month +5.8%-13.9%+7.2% +0.9%
3 months -31.0%-26.6%+24.8% +5.9%
6 months -47.1%-31.6%+90.2% +8.5%
Year to date -53.8%-20.6%+94.2% +13.3%
1 year -61.7%-0.4%+106.2% +12.4%
3 years —+57.0%+103.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+16.2%+26.7% +23.5%
5 years —+31.6%-77.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+5.6%-25.6% +11.0%
10 years —+88.8%+827.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+6.6%+25.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFLXCHRWCYRXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 99.3%48.4%46.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 113.9%53.3%40.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.990.551.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.62-0.012.30 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.6%-43.2%-94.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-39.1%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $4.16$209.42$18.64 $779.14
52-week low $0.80$127.60$7.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLXCHRWCYRX
P/E now vs peer median -55.3xmedian 16.1x 22.6xmedian 16.1x -20.7xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 5.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.6x —median 8.6x -57.9xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.6x 26.2xmedian 11.6x -47.1xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.2x 9.5xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 1.15median 0.80 -9.95median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLXCHRWCYRX
Revenue $558.59M $18.22B $186.45M
Gross profit $60.56M – $87.77M
Operating income $5.06M $884.59M -$39.62M
Net income -$1.71M $668.81M -$37.39M
Free cash flow – – -$20.03M
R&D $9.48M – $17.75M
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $5.58 $-0.90
Cash & equivalents $84.66M $193.13M $269.27M
Total debt – – $186.83M
Shares (diluted) 69.52M 119.75M 50.44M
Enterprise value -$276.67M $14.94B -$688.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLXCHRWCYRX
P/E -55.3x 22.6x -20.7x
P/FCF – 26.2x -47.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 28.0x 118.4x
P/S 0.2x 0.8x 5.1x
P/B 1.0x 9.5x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 9.5x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA – – -57.9x
EV/EBIT -3.6x – -18.5x
EV/Revenue 0.0x 0.8x 3.9x
EV/FCF – – -36.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 28.0x 92.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.15 -9.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLXCHRWCYRX
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.8% 10.4% 12.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.4% -8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -10.0% – 14.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 149.3% 10.9% 7.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.7% 5.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 94.4% 11.5% -147.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 19.7% 1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 96.5% 12.9% -163.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.7% 2.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -39.1% 147.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.5% 33.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 40.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 10.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLXCHRWCYRX
Gross margin 10.8% – 47.1%
EBITDA margin – – -6.8%
Operating margin 0.9% – -21.2%
Pretax margin -0.3% – -16.6%
Net margin -0.3% – -24.3%
FCF margin – – -10.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 2.9% 4.3%
Return on equity -1.5% – -7.6%
Return on assets -1.0% – -4.9%
Return on invested capital – – -5.8%
Return on capital employed 4.5% – -7.4%
Asset turnover 3.3x 3.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 5.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLXCHRWCYRX
Debt / assets – – 24.7%
Debt / equity – – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 16.6x
Debt / FCF – – -9.3x
Liabilities / assets 35.0% 75.3% 35.1%
Equity / assets 65.0% 24.7% 64.9%
Interest coverage – – -18.8x
Current ratio 2.4x 1.3x 2.1x
Quick ratio 2.3x – 2.0x
Cash ratio 2.2x – 1.8x
Altman Z-score – – 1.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLXCHRWCYRX
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.4%
Shareholder yield – 2.0% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLXCHRWCYRX
Forward P/E 3.4xFY2026 20.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.43FY2026 $6.12FY2026 $-0.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +514.3%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 -155.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.0% +19.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $648.80MFY2026 $18.98BFY2026 $201.00MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.7%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026 +14.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.6% +1.5% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLXCHRWCYRX
Held by institutions – 100.0% 89.0%
Institutions holding – 891 184
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.7% -1.6%
Institutions buying – 445 102
Institutions selling – 318 49
Buyers to sellers – 1.40 2.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLXCHRWCYRX
FLX 1.00 -0.03 -0.04
CHRW -0.03 1.00 0.11
CYRX -0.04 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLX, CHRW and CYRX?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: BingEx (FLX) $107.50M, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.94B, Cryoport (CYRX) $944.09M.

Which company is growing faster?

Cryoport (CYRX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BingEx (FLX) -3.8%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Cryoport (CYRX) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

BingEx (FLX) has the highest net margin (BingEx (FLX) -0.3%, Cryoport (CYRX) -24.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cryoport (CYRX) returned the most: BingEx (FLX) -61.7%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -0.4%, Cryoport (CYRX) +106.2%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr, Cryoport (CYRX) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 1.97%. BingEx (FLX) and Cryoport (CYRX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cryoport (CYRX) has been the steadiest (BingEx (FLX) 99.3%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%, Cryoport (CYRX) 46.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLX, CHRW and CYRX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, BingEx (FLX) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.