FLUT vs SGHC vs VIPZ Stock Comparison

Flutter Entertainment, Super Group (SGHC) and VIP Play Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc
$79.21 +6.4% 1M -66.5% 1Y
Market cap
$14.38B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.16B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
1 win
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Ltd
$10.73 -7.3% 1M -2.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.43B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
VIPZ VIP Play, Inc.
$0.20 -41.2% 1M -9.1% 1Y
Market cap
$14.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.00K
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Super Group (SGHC) leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Super Group (SGHC) 7, VIP Play 2, Flutter Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLUTSGHCVIPZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.38B $5.39B $14.69M FLUT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.1x 14.6x -1.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.0x 13.4x — SGHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.2% +17.3% +94.7% VIPZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% 15.2% -5,143.8% SGHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.0% 39.5% — SGHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.1x -0.8x -2.6x VIPZ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -66.5% -2.9% -9.1% SGHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.0%/yr -0.8%/yr — SGHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 43.6% 180.6% SGHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 87/100 15/100 SGHC

Percentile Scorecard

FLUTSGHCVIPZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Valuation 55 #21 of 45 68 #15 of 45 0 #45 of 45
Growth 29 #31 of 43 100 #1 of 43 57 #19 of 43
Profitability 32 #29 of 42 100 #1 of 42 0 #42 of 42
Financial Health 43 #28 of 48 98 #2 of 48 2 #47 of 48
Shareholder Returns 63 #11 of 28 70 #9 of 28 –
Overall 44 87 15
  • FLUT ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SGHC ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • VIPZ ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLUTSGHCVIPZSPY
1 month +6.4%-7.3%-41.2% +0.7%
3 months -22.4%-23.8%-42.9% +3.7%
6 months -26.6%-17.2%-60.0% +7.1%
Year to date -63.2%-10.2%-20.0% +12.8%
1 year -66.5%-2.9%-9.1% +11.9%
3 years -49.2%+186.1%-83.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year -20.2%+42.0%-45.0% +22.8%
5 years -58.1%-4.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -16.0%-0.8%— +10.9%
10 years -30.8%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year -3.6%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLUTSGHCVIPZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%43.6%180.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.9%42.5%387.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.62-0.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.30-0.07-0.05 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-78.5%-98.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.5%-31.1%-60.0% -1.2%
52-week high $236.53$15.58$0.50 $779.14
52-week low $74.27$8.52$0.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLUTSGHCVIPZ
P/E now vs peer median -18.4xmedian 17.4x 14.7xmedian 17.4x -1.5xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.2xmedian 1.9x 79.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 10.8x 7.9xmedian 10.8x -3.9xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.7x —median 11.7x -1.7xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.5x 6.5xmedian 2.5x -0.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.55 0.21median 0.55 -0.06median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Revenue $17.16B $2.43B $185.00K
Gross profit $7.29B – -$1.04M
Operating income -$641.00M – -$11.87M
Net income -$866.00M $372.40M -$9.52M
Free cash flow $1.24B – -$8.89M
R&D $1.08B – –
EPS (diluted) $-4.31 $0.73 $-0.13
Cash & equivalents $1.56B $548.00M $128.00K
Total debt $11.98B $26.00M $107.47M
Shares (diluted) 175.00M 507.84M 73.46M
Enterprise value $7.75B $3.45B $13.68M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLUTSGHCVIPZ
P/E -18.4x 14.7x -1.5x
P/FCF 11.1x – -1.7x
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x – -1.7x
P/S 0.8x 2.2x 79.4x
P/B 1.5x 6.5x -0.4x
P/Tangible book 5.5x 10.7x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA 23.5x 7.9x -3.9x
EV/EBIT -37.7x 11.0x -3.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.0x 242.3x
EV/FCF 19.5x – -5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x – -5.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.21 -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.2% 17.3% 94.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% – -74.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -130.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -164.9% – 24.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -14.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -309.2% 174.9% 50.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 70.3% 5.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -310.7% 172.1% 50.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 69.8% 26.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.7% – 14.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -9.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.2% – 14.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Gross margin 42.5% – -561.6%
EBITDA margin 6.0% 25.5% -6,155%
Operating margin -3.7% – -6,417%
Pretax margin -4.3% 18.3% -7,824%
Net margin -4.4% 15.2% -5,144%
FCF margin 7.2% – -4,807%
Operating cash flow margin 7.8% – -4,807%
Return on equity -9.5% 47.9% –
Return on assets -3.1% 28.7% -479.0%
Return on invested capital -3.0% 39.5% –
Return on capital employed -2.8% 35.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.9x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 1.7% 298.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Debt / assets 42.5% 1.9% 1,329%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.0x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.1x -0.8x -2.6x
Debt / FCF 9.6x – -3.4x
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 39.2% 1,855%
Equity / assets 31.8% 60.8% -1,755%
Interest coverage – 149.0x -4.6x
Current ratio 0.9x – 0.0x
Quick ratio 0.4x 17.8x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 13.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.33 – -83.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Dividend yield – 4.1% –
Net buyback yield 5.8% – –
Shareholder yield 5.8% 4.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Forward P/E 18.0xFY2026 13.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.40FY2026 $0.80FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -44.6%FY2026 +86.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +49.8% +23.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.91BFY2026 $2.52BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% +8.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLUTSGHCVIPZ
Held by institutions 83.0% 23.8% –
Institutions holding 404 196 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +21.4% –
Institutions buying 199 118 –
Institutions selling 170 59 –
Buyers to sellers 1.17 2.00 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLUTSGHCVIPZ
FLUT 1.00 0.37 -0.03
SGHC 0.37 1.00 -0.06
VIPZ -0.03 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLUT, SGHC and VIPZ?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) $14.38B, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) $5.39B, VIP Play (VIPZ) $14.69M.

Which company is growing faster?

VIP Play (VIPZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) +15.2%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) +17.3%, VIP Play (VIPZ) +94.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) has the highest net margin (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -4.4%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 15.2%, VIP Play (VIPZ) -5,143.8%). On return on invested capital, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -3.0%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 39.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) returned the most: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -66.5%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -2.9%, VIP Play (VIPZ) -9.1%. Over five years, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) compounded fastest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -16.0%/yr, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -0.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) has been the steadiest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 51.0%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 43.6%, VIP Play (VIPZ) 180.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLUT, SGHC and VIPZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.