FLUT vs GLXZ vs SGHC Stock Comparison

Flutter Entertainment, Galaxy Gaming and Super Group (SGHC) Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc
$79.21 +6.4% 1M -66.5% 1Y
Market cap
$14.38B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.16B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
1 win
GLXZ Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
$1.62 +1.2% 1M -42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$42.34M
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.16M
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
2 wins
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Ltd
$10.73 -7.3% 1M -2.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.43B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Super Group (SGHC) leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Super Group (SGHC) 8, Galaxy Gaming 2, Flutter Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLUTGLXZSGHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.38B $42.34M $5.39B FLUT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.1x 8.6x 14.6x GLXZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.0x — 13.4x SGHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.2% +2.1% +17.3% SGHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% 15.8% 15.2% GLXZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.0% 36.2% 39.5% SGHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 2.8x -0.8x SGHC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -66.5% -42.1% -2.9% SGHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.0%/yr -17.9%/yr -0.8%/yr SGHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 48.8% 43.6% SGHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 62/100 87/100 SGHC

Percentile Scorecard

FLUTGLXZSGHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLUTGLXZSGHC
Valuation 55 #21 of 45 88 #21 of 166 68 #15 of 45
Growth 29 #31 of 43 71 #45 of 153 100 #1 of 43
Profitability 32 #29 of 42 97 #5 of 153 100 #1 of 42
Financial Health 43 #28 of 48 28 #130 of 179 98 #2 of 48
Shareholder Returns 63 #11 of 28 28 #66 of 91 70 #9 of 28
Overall 44 62 87
  • FLUT ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • GLXZ ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • SGHC ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLUTGLXZSGHCSPY
1 month +6.4%+1.2%-7.3% +0.7%
3 months -22.4%0.0%-23.8% +3.7%
6 months -26.6%-14.7%-17.2% +7.1%
Year to date -63.2%-43.4%-10.2% +12.8%
1 year -66.5%-42.1%-2.9% +11.9%
3 years -49.2%-38.2%+186.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -20.2%-14.8%+42.0% +22.8%
5 years -58.1%-62.6%-4.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year -16.0%-17.9%-0.8% +10.9%
10 years -30.8%+211.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -3.6%+12.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLUTGLXZSGHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%48.8%43.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.9%54.3%42.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.260.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.30-0.86-0.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-76.0%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.5%-45.1%-31.1% -1.2%
52-week high $236.53$2.95$15.58 $779.14
52-week low $74.27$1.50$8.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLUTGLXZSGHC
P/E now vs peer median -18.4xmedian 17.4x 8.6xmedian 16.7x 14.7xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.4x 2.2xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 10.8x 6.2xmedian 12.7x 7.9xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.7x 5.5xmedian 10.5x —median 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.5x -2.7xmedian 1.7x 6.5xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.55 0.04median 0.39 0.21median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLUTGLXZSGHC
Revenue $17.16B $31.16M $2.43B
Gross profit $7.29B $30.61M –
Operating income -$641.00M $8.33M –
Net income -$866.00M $4.92M $372.40M
Free cash flow $1.24B $7.41M –
R&D $1.08B $605.98K –
EPS (diluted) $-4.31 $0.19 $0.73
Cash & equivalents $1.56B $4.76M $548.00M
Total debt $11.98B $155.53M $26.00M
Shares (diluted) 175.00M 26.13M 507.84M
Enterprise value $7.75B $25.08M $3.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLUTGLXZSGHC
P/E -18.4x 8.6x 14.7x
P/FCF 11.1x 5.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x 5.5x –
P/S 0.8x 1.3x 2.2x
P/B 1.5x -2.7x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 5.5x -1.6x 10.7x
EV/EBITDA 23.5x 6.2x 7.9x
EV/EBIT -37.7x 8.9x 11.0x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.4x 2.0x
EV/FCF 19.5x 10.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.2x 9.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.04 0.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLUTGLXZSGHC
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.2% 2.1% 17.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% 19.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% 3.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -164.9% 67.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -309.2% 218.5% 174.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 210.5% 70.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -310.7% 218.8% 172.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 208.1% 69.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.7% 64.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 3.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.2% 65.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 3.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLUTGLXZSGHC
Gross margin 42.5% 98.2% –
EBITDA margin 6.0% 38.6% 25.5%
Operating margin -3.7% 26.7% –
Pretax margin -4.3% 16.1% 18.3%
Net margin -4.4% 15.8% 15.2%
FCF margin 7.2% 23.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.8% 24.1% –
Return on equity -9.5% – 47.9%
Return on assets -3.1% 18.2% 28.7%
Return on invested capital -3.0% 36.2% 39.5%
Return on capital employed -2.8% 41.7% 35.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 1.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 1.1% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLUTGLXZSGHC
Debt / assets 42.5% 140.6% 1.9%
Debt / equity 1.3x -2.5x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 2.8x -0.8x
Debt / FCF 9.6x 5.1x –
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 156.2% 39.2%
Equity / assets 31.8% -56.2% 60.8%
Interest coverage – 2.6x 149.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.5x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.7x 17.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.7x 13.0x
Altman Z-score 1.33 1.07 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLUTGLXZSGHC
Dividend yield – – 4.1%
Net buyback yield 5.8% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 5.8% -0.1% 4.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLUTGLXZSGHC
Forward P/E 18.0xFY2026 – 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.40FY2026 – $0.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.6%FY2026 – +86.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +49.8% – +23.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.91BFY2026 – $2.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 – +14.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% – +8.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLUTGLXZSGHC
Held by institutions 83.0% 0.9% 23.8%
Institutions holding 404 2 196
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% – +21.4%
Institutions buying 199 0 118
Institutions selling 170 0 59
Buyers to sellers 1.17 – 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLUTGLXZSGHC
FLUT 1.00 0.08 0.38
GLXZ 0.08 1.00 -0.15
SGHC 0.38 -0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLUT, GLXZ and SGHC?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) $14.38B, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) $42.34M, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) $5.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLUT, GLXZ and SGHC?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -19.1x, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 8.6x, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 14.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) is cheapest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 18.0x, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 13.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) +15.2%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) +2.1%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) +17.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) has the highest net margin (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -4.4%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 15.8%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 15.2%). On return on invested capital, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -3.0%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 36.2%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 39.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) returned the most: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -66.5%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -42.1%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -2.9%. Over five years, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) compounded fastest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -16.0%/yr, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -17.9%/yr, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -0.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) has been the steadiest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 51.0%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 48.8%, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 43.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLUT, GLXZ and SGHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.