FLUT vs CZR vs CHDN Stock Comparison

Flutter Entertainment, Caesars Entertainment and Churchill Downs Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc
$78.25 -6.4% 1M -68.0% 1Y
Market cap
$13.58B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.16B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
CHDN Churchill Downs Inc
$81.52 +2.2% 1M -20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.68B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.99B
Div. yield
0.54%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Churchill Downs leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Churchill Downs 5, Caesars Entertainment 3, Flutter Entertainment 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLUTCZRCHDNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.58B $5.88B $5.68B FLUT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.2x -11.0x 13.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.8x — 11.6x CHDN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.2% +3.1% +5.7% FLUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% -4.5% 13.8% CHDN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.0% 11.4% 8.4% CZR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 3.3x 4.8x CZR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.54% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -68.0% +27.9% -20.9% CZR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.4%/yr -23.6%/yr -7.3%/yr CHDN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 43.8% 34.3% CHDN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 47/100 51/100 CHDN

Percentile Scorecard

FLUTCZRCHDN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLUTCZRCHDN
Valuation 54 #21 of 44 86 #7 of 44 63 #17 of 44
Growth 21 #34 of 43 17 #36 of 43 69 #14 of 43
Profitability 33 #28 of 41 50 #21 of 41 83 #8 of 41
Financial Health 39 #29 of 47 37 #30 of 47 20 #38 of 47
Shareholder Returns 71 #9 of 29 46 #16 of 29 21 #23 of 29
Overall 44 47 51
  • FLUT ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CZR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CHDN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLUTCZRCHDNSPY
1 month -6.4%-2.5%+2.2% -0.2%
3 months -28.3%-3.7%-8.6% +3.9%
6 months -28.3%+5.6%-18.1% +8.2%
Year to date -63.6%+23.3%-28.4% +12.9%
1 year -68.0%+27.9%-20.9% +12.3%
3 years -49.5%-26.3%-24.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.4%-9.7%-9.1% +23.3%
5 years -59.1%-74.0%-31.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.4%-23.6%-7.3% +10.9%
10 years -31.7%+138.4%+256.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -3.7%+9.1%+13.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLUTCZRCHDNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%43.8%34.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.6%40.4%34.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.580.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.330.64-0.61 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-83.8%-50.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.0%-5.1%-30.7% -1.2%
52-week high $244.54$30.41$117.59 $779.14
52-week low $74.27$18.14$73.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLUTCZRCHDN
P/E now vs peer median -18.2xmedian 17.0x -11.0xmedian 17.0x 13.8xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 0.5xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.3xmedian 10.8x 5.2xmedian 10.8x 10.8xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 11.2x 10.1xmedian 11.2x 10.0xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.4x 1.7xmedian 2.4x 4.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 0.27median 0.56 1.65median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLUTCZRCHDN
Revenue $17.16B $11.72B $2.99B
Gross profit $7.29B $5.82B $1.02B
Operating income -$641.00M $1.80B $721.50M
Net income -$866.00M -$497.00M $415.70M
Free cash flow $1.24B $582.00M $567.90M
R&D $1.08B – –
EPS (diluted) $-4.31 $-2.61 $5.91
Cash & equivalents $1.56B $864.00M $196.00M
Total debt $11.98B $11.56B $4.77B
Shares (diluted) 175.00M 204.00M 70.00M
Enterprise value $7.33B $2.47B $4.95B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLUTCZRCHDN
P/E -18.2x -11.0x 13.8x
P/FCF 10.9x 10.1x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 10.2x 4.7x 7.1x
P/S 0.8x 0.5x 1.9x
P/B 1.5x 1.7x 4.2x
P/Tangible book 5.4x -12.0x -4.8x
EV/EBITDA 23.3x 5.2x 10.8x
EV/EBIT -37.4x 9.2x 14.2x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 1.4x 3.4x
EV/FCF 19.3x 28.5x 18.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.0x 13.3x 12.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.27 1.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLUTCZRCHDN
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.2% 3.1% 5.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.6% 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% 1.9% 8.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.1% 13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -164.9% -18.0% 1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -9.4% 19.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -309.2% -140.1% -4.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -39.0% 5.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -310.7% -124.4% -1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -40.9% 8.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.7% -4.7% 1.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -11.9% 14.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.2% 53.2% 54.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.7% 160.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLUTCZRCHDN
Gross margin 42.5% 49.7% 34.2%
EBITDA margin 6.0% 27.4% 31.8%
Operating margin -3.7% 15.4% 24.1%
Pretax margin -4.3% -4.1% 19.6%
Net margin -4.4% -4.5% 13.8%
FCF margin 7.2% 5.0% 19.0%
Operating cash flow margin 7.8% 10.6% 26.6%
Return on equity -9.5% -13.3% 34.1%
Return on assets -3.1% -1.5% 5.5%
Return on invested capital -3.0% 11.4% 8.4%
Return on capital employed -2.8% 6.1% 11.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x -2.5x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 0.8% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLUTCZRCHDN
Debt / assets 42.5% 36.8% 63.5%
Debt / equity 1.3x 3.4x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 3.3x 4.8x
Debt / FCF 9.6x 19.9x 8.4x
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 89.0% 82.2%
Equity / assets 31.8% 11.0% 17.8%
Interest coverage – – 2.5x
Current ratio 0.9x 0.8x 0.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.32 – 1.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLUTCZRCHDN
Dividend yield – – 0.5%
Net buyback yield 5.9% 3.0% 1.5%
Shareholder yield 5.9% 3.0% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLUTCZRCHDN
Forward P/E 17.8xFY2026 – 11.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.40FY2026 $-1.01FY2026 $7.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.6%FY2026 – +14.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +49.8% – -3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.91BFY2026 $11.36BFY2026 $3.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% +9.7% +1.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLUTCZRCHDN
Held by institutions 83.0% 96.6% 85.5%
Institutions holding 403 415 462
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% -4.0% +7.5%
Institutions buying 199 208 239
Institutions selling 170 151 146
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.38 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLUTCZRCHDN
FLUT 1.00 0.21 0.34
CZR 0.21 1.00 0.12
CHDN 0.34 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLUT, CZR and CHDN?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) $13.58B, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) $5.88B, Churchill Downs (CHDN) $5.68B.

Which company is growing faster?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) +15.2%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +3.1%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) +5.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) has the highest net margin (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -4.4%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -4.5%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) leads (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -3.0%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 11.4%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caesars Entertainment (CZR) returned the most: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -68.0%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +27.9%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) -20.9%. Over five years, Churchill Downs (CHDN) compounded fastest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -16.4%/yr, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -23.6%/yr, Churchill Downs (CHDN) -7.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Churchill Downs (CHDN) 0.54%. Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Caesars Entertainment (CZR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Churchill Downs (CHDN) has been the steadiest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 51.0%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 43.8%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 34.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLUT, CZR and CHDN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Churchill Downs (CHDN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.