FLOC vs TS vs OMSE Stock Comparison

Flowco Holdings, Tenaris and OMS Energy Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLOC Flowco Holdings Inc.
$19.91 +3.9% 1M +23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.80B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$819.54M
Div. yield
2.41%
Oilfield Equipment Energy
3 wins
TS Tenaris Sa
$60.32 +8.7% 1M +62.5% 1Y
Market cap
$64.66B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.04B
Div. yield
2.95%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tenaris leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tenaris 6, Flowco Holdings 3, OMS Energy Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLOCTSOMSELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.80B $64.66B $177.44M TS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.2x 33.3x 5.5x OMSE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.0x 15.2x 6.4x OMSE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.7% +2.3% — FLOC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.1% 15.9% — TS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 23.0% 12.7% — FLOC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.9x -3.1x — TS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.41% 2.95% — TS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.3% +62.5% -25.0% TS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +21.7%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.7% 29.0% 50.8% TS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 58/100 — FLOC

Percentile Scorecard

FLOCTSOMSE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLOCTSOMSE
Valuation 72 #14 of 47 40 #122 of 203 98 #2 of 47
Growth 74 #12 of 43 17 #156 of 188 –
Profitability 95 #3 of 40 82 #34 of 183 –
Financial Health 41 #27 of 45 99 #4 of 217 100 #1 of 45
Shareholder Returns 48 #17 of 32 53 #72 of 153 –
Overall 66 58 –
  • FLOC ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • TS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • OMSE ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLOCTSOMSESPY
1 month +3.9%+8.7%-4.1% -0.2%
3 months +3.3%+8.4%+0.7% +3.9%
6 months -18.2%-4.5%-13.8% +8.2%
Year to date +6.2%+56.9%-5.0% +12.9%
1 year +23.3%+62.5%-25.0% +12.3%
3 years —+92.0%— +87.4%
3 years, per year —+24.3%— +23.3%
5 years —+167.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —+21.7%— +10.9%
10 years —+109.1%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+7.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLOCTSOMSESPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.7%29.0%50.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.2%29.4%55.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.820.330.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.512.16-0.49 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.9%-33.7%-63.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.1%-5.8%-38.3% -1.2%
52-week high $28.09$64.02$6.78 $779.14
52-week low $15.61$37.11$3.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLOCTSOMSE
P/E now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 26.1x 33.3xmedian 25.2x 5.5xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.3x 5.4xmedian 1.9x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 8.8x 19.6xmedian 14.0x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 14.9x 23.2xmedian 21.7x 3.3xmedian 14.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 1.7x 3.8xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.49 —median 1.32 —median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLOCTSOMSE
Revenue $819.54M $12.04B –
Gross profit $186.03M $4.08B –
Operating income $154.08M $2.23B –
Net income $135.66M $1.97B –
Free cash flow $136.24M $2.78B –
EPS (diluted) $1.13 – –
Cash & equivalents $19.19M $9.02B $152.00M
Total debt $298.41M $1.27B –
Shares (diluted) 43.97M – 42.00M
Enterprise value $2.74B $35.96B -$209.27M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLOCTSOMSE
P/E 17.2x 33.3x 5.5x
P/FCF 13.2x 23.2x 3.3x
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 28.9x –
P/S 2.2x 5.4x 1.1x
P/B 4.9x 3.8x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 30.7x 3.8x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 6.4x 19.6x –
EV/EBIT 13.5x 25.1x –
EV/Revenue 2.5x 4.6x –
EV/FCF 15.3x 20.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.0x 25.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLOCTSOMSE
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.7% 2.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.1% 2.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -13.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.6% 0.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -20.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 39.3% -3.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -18.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) -45.8% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.3% -11.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% -13.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLOCTSOMSE
Gross margin 22.7% 33.9% –
EBITDA margin 39.5% 23.7% –
Operating margin 18.8% 18.5% –
Pretax margin 16.7% 20.5% –
Net margin 6.1% 15.9% –
FCF margin 16.6% 23.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 41.9% 18.6% –
Return on equity 38.7% 11.4% –
Return on assets 7.1% 9.7% –
Return on invested capital 23.0% 12.7% –
Return on capital employed 8.7% 11.0% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLOCTSOMSE
Debt / assets 15.5% 1.5% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.9x -3.1x –
Debt / FCF 2.2x 0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 81.0% 15.2% 16.8%
Equity / assets 19.0% 84.8% 83.2%
Interest coverage 9.0x 45.4x –
Current ratio 2.7x – 6.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 70.8x 5.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 58.2x 5.1x
Altman Z-score 1.55 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLOCTSOMSE
Dividend yield 2.4% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.8% -1.5% –
Shareholder yield 4.2% 1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 25.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 25.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -84.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLOCTSOMSE
Forward P/E 13.0xFY2026 15.2xFY2026 6.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.53FY2026 $3.97FY2026 $0.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.0%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026 -17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.6% +1.5% +27.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $892.01MFY2026 $12.99BFY2026 $145.55MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.4%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026 -6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.5% -6.1% +15.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLOCTSOMSE
Held by institutions 97.3% 3.6% –
Institutions holding 151 283 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +19.3% -2.4% –
Institutions buying 102 154 –
Institutions selling 33 78 –
Buyers to sellers 3.09 1.97 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLOCTSOMSE
FLOC 1.00 0.29 -0.01
TS 0.29 1.00 0.06
OMSE -0.01 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLOC, TS and OMSE?

Tenaris (TS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowco Holdings (FLOC) $1.80B, Tenaris (TS) $64.66B, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) $177.44M.

Which stock is cheaper, FLOC, TS and OMSE?

OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 17.2x, Tenaris (TS) 33.3x, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) 5.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) is cheapest (Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 13.0x, Tenaris (TS) 15.2x, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) 6.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Flowco Holdings (FLOC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowco Holdings (FLOC) +7.7%, Tenaris (TS) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest net margin (Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 6.1%, Tenaris (TS) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Flowco Holdings (FLOC) leads (Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 23.0%, Tenaris (TS) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tenaris (TS) returned the most: Flowco Holdings (FLOC) +23.3%, Tenaris (TS) +62.5%, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) -25.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest dividend yield: Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 2.41%, Tenaris (TS) 2.95%. OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tenaris (TS) has been the steadiest (Flowco Holdings (FLOC) 45.7%, Tenaris (TS) 29.0%, OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) 50.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLOC, TS and OMSE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tenaris (TS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.