FLL vs CZR vs CHDN Stock Comparison

Full House Resorts, Caesars Entertainment and Churchill Downs Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLL Full House Resorts Inc
$0.86 -49.4% 1M -69.5% 1Y
Market cap
$30.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$305.86M
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
CHDN Churchill Downs Inc
$84.04 +5.4% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.70B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.99B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Caesars Entertainment leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Caesars Entertainment 5, Churchill Downs 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLLCZRCHDNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $30.47M $5.88B $5.70B CZR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x -12.7x 13.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 12.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.8% +2.4% +5.7% CHDN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.1% -4.0% 13.8% CHDN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 11.1% 8.4% CZR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 8.3x 3.3x 4.8x CZR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.5% +30.4% -16.8% CZR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.7%/yr -23.5%/yr -7.7%/yr CHDN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.5% 43.9% 34.2% CHDN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 53/100 51/100 CZR

Percentile Scorecard

FLLCZRCHDN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLLCZRCHDN
Valuation 72 #13 of 44 88 #6 of 44 61 #18 of 44
Growth 83 #8 of 43 33 #29 of 43 69 #14 of 43
Profitability 38 #26 of 41 53 #20 of 41 83 #8 of 41
Financial Health 15 #40 of 47 37 #30 of 47 20 #38 of 47
Shareholder Returns 7 #26 of 28 – 22 #22 of 28
Overall 43 53 51
  • FLL ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CZR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CHDN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLLCZRCHDNSPY
1 month -49.4%-2.0%+5.4% -0.8%
3 months -63.1%-3.3%-4.7% +3.5%
6 months -64.5%+3.4%-16.3% +7.0%
Year to date -67.0%+23.9%-26.1% +12.2%
1 year -69.5%+30.4%-16.8% +13.0%
3 years -76.2%-25.9%-22.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -38.0%-9.5%-8.2% +23.1%
5 years -92.0%-73.8%-32.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -39.7%-23.5%-7.7% +11.0%
10 years -47.9%+141.6%+261.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year -6.3%+9.2%+13.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFLLCZRCHDNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.5%43.9%34.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.1%40.5%34.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.930.580.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.080.69-0.49 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.0%-83.8%-50.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.1%-4.7%-28.5% -1.8%
52-week high $3.32$30.41$117.59 $779.14
52-week low $0.86$18.14$73.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLLCZRCHDN
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 17.1x -12.7xmedian 17.1x 14.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.9x 0.5xmedian 1.9x 2.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 10.9x 5.1xmedian 10.9x 11.0xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 11.4x 9.7xmedian 11.4x 10.3xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 2.5x 1.7xmedian 2.5x 4.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 0.57 0.32median 0.57 1.70median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLLCZRCHDN
Revenue $305.86M $11.65B $2.99B
Gross profit $157.64M $5.79B $1.02B
Operating income $7.08M $1.86B $721.50M
Net income -$36.89M -$450.00M $415.70M
Free cash flow $3.96M $610.00M $567.90M
EPS (diluted) $-1.01 $-2.28 $5.91
Cash & equivalents $33.41M $965.00M $196.00M
Total debt $1.89B $11.70B $4.77B
Shares (diluted) 36.45M 204.00M 70.00M
Enterprise value -$105.91M $2.33B $4.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLLCZRCHDN
P/E -0.8x -12.7x 14.2x
P/FCF 8.0x 9.7x 10.3x
P/Operating cash flow 2.2x 4.6x 7.4x
P/S 0.1x 0.5x 2.0x
P/B -2.4x 1.7x 4.4x
P/Tangible book -0.3x -14.5x -5.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.9x 5.1x 11.0x
EV/EBIT 66.1x 9.0x 14.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.4x 3.5x
EV/FCF 118.1x 27.3x 18.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.4x 12.8x 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 0.32 1.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLLCZRCHDN
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.8% 2.4% 5.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 0.7% 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.0% -0.5% 8.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.4% -1.9% 13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 315.2% -20.2% 1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.9% -7.7% 19.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.8% -152.8% -4.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.2% -38.5% 5.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.8% -144.3% -1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -8.2% -39.5% 8.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 539.6% 6.2% 1.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 97.0% -10.8% 14.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 117.5% 838.5% 54.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.4% -7.7% 160.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLLCZRCHDN
Gross margin 51.5% 49.7% 34.2%
EBITDA margin 17.2% 27.9% 31.8%
Operating margin 2.3% 15.9% 24.1%
Pretax margin -11.8% -3.7% 19.6%
Net margin -12.1% -4.0% 13.8%
FCF margin 1.3% 5.2% 19.0%
Operating cash flow margin 4.7% 11.1% 26.6%
Return on equity – -11.1% 34.1%
Return on assets -5.9% -1.3% 5.5%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 11.1% 8.4%
Return on capital employed 1.3% 6.3% 11.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x -2.9x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.8% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLLCZRCHDN
Debt / assets 74.5% 36.9% 63.5%
Debt / equity -35.2x 3.3x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 8.3x 3.3x 4.8x
Debt / FCF 118.5x 19.2x 8.4x
Liabilities / assets 102.1% 88.8% 82.2%
Equity / assets -2.1% 11.2% 17.8%
Interest coverage 0.2x – 2.5x
Current ratio 0.6x 0.9x 0.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.20 – 1.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLLCZRCHDN
Dividend yield – – 0.5%
Net buyback yield -0.9% – 1.5%
Shareholder yield -0.9% – 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLLCZRCHDN
Forward P/E – – 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.86FY2026 $-1.01FY2026 $7.03FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +14.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $294.72MFY2026 $11.36BFY2026 $3.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.5%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.9% +9.7% +1.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLLCZRCHDN
Held by institutions 38.2% 96.6% 85.5%
Institutions holding 65 415 462
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% -4.0% +7.5%
Institutions buying 33 208 239
Institutions selling 15 151 146
Buyers to sellers 2.20 1.38 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLLCZRCHDN
FLL 1.00 0.16 0.11
CZR 0.16 1.00 0.12
CHDN 0.11 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLL, CZR and CHDN?

Caesars Entertainment (CZR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Full House Resorts (FLL) $30.47M, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) $5.88B, Churchill Downs (CHDN) $5.70B.

Which company is growing faster?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Full House Resorts (FLL) +2.8%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +2.4%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) +5.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) has the highest net margin (Full House Resorts (FLL) -12.1%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -4.0%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) leads (Full House Resorts (FLL) 1.5%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 11.1%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caesars Entertainment (CZR) returned the most: Full House Resorts (FLL) -69.5%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) +30.4%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) -16.8%. Over five years, Churchill Downs (CHDN) compounded fastest (Full House Resorts (FLL) -39.7%/yr, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) -23.5%/yr, Churchill Downs (CHDN) -7.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Churchill Downs (CHDN) has been the steadiest (Full House Resorts (FLL) 64.5%, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) 43.9%, Churchill Downs (CHDN) 34.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLL, CZR and CHDN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Caesars Entertainment (CZR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.