FIVN vs OOMA vs SPOK Stock Comparison

Five9, Ooma and Spok Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FIVN Five9, Inc.
$37.13 +3.8% 1M +56.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.83B
P/E
47.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins
OOMA Ooma Inc
$20.09 -7.8% 1M +75.0% 1Y
Market cap
$564.94M
P/E
51.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$306.59M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins
SPOK Spok Holdings, Inc
$10.11 -3.3% 1M -38.2% 1Y
Market cap
$213.37M
P/E
17.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$135.97M
Div. yield
0.13%
Healthcare IT Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Spok Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Spok Holdings 5, Five9 2, Ooma 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIVNOOMASPOKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.83B $564.94M $213.37M FIVN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 47.6x 51.7x 17.4x SPOK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.9x 15.6x 15.8x FIVN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.9% +17.2% -3.4% OOMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 3.6% 9.0% SPOK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +56.9% +75.0% -38.2% OOMA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.2%/yr -1.9%/yr -0.1%/yr SPOK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 68.5% 45.5% 31.7% SPOK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 55/100 70/100 SPOK

Percentile Scorecard

FIVNOOMASPOK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIVNOOMASPOK
Valuation 64 #11 of 29 50 #15 of 29 99 #2 of 89
Growth 81 #6 of 27 100 #1 of 27 15 #69 of 81
Profitability 60 #11 of 26 56 #12 of 26 87 #11 of 76
Financial Health 70 #10 of 31 37 #20 of 31 53 #45 of 94
Shareholder Returns 50 #9 of 17 31 #12 of 17 98 #2 of 51
Overall 65 55 70
  • FIVN ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • OOMA ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SPOK ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIVNOOMASPOKSPY
1 month +3.8%-7.8%-3.3% -0.2%
3 months +36.9%-9.5%-7.2% +3.9%
6 months +121.5%+23.2%-11.9% +8.2%
Year to date +85.2%+71.3%-23.4% +12.9%
1 year +56.9%+75.0%-38.2% +12.3%
3 years -34.4%+87.1%-33.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -13.1%+23.2%-12.6% +23.3%
5 years -76.6%-9.1%-0.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.2%-1.9%-0.1% +10.9%
10 years +166.5%+127.8%-43.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.3%+8.6%-5.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFIVNOOMASPOKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 68.5%45.5%31.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.8%44.8%39.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.470.680.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.831.65-1.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.8%-71.8%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.9%-14.1%-38.4% -1.2%
52-week high $38.65$23.39$16.41 $779.14
52-week low $13.61$10.58$10.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIVNOOMASPOK
P/E now vs peer median 47.1xmedian 31.0x 50.6xmedian 31.0x 17.3xmedian 40.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.4x 1.8xmedian 2.4x 1.6xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 11.3x 22.7xmedian 11.3x 9.8xmedian 18.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 15.6x 18.3xmedian 15.6x 8.3xmedian 20.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 3.0x 5.6xmedian 3.0x 1.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.27median 0.74 0.71median 0.74 -0.57median 1.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIVNOOMASPOK
Revenue $1.20B $306.59M $135.97M
Gross profit $660.99M $188.46M $106.16M
Operating income $56.31M $10.90M $16.17M
Net income $59.47M $10.93M $12.24M
Free cash flow $209.12M $30.30M $25.41M
R&D $153.07M $55.82M $12.87M
EPS (diluted) $0.70 $0.38 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $187.31M $17.53M $16.59M
Total debt – $46.45M –
Shares (diluted) 85.48M 28.88M 21.08M
Enterprise value $78.44M $488.38M $133.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIVNOOMASPOK
P/E 47.1x 50.6x 17.3x
P/FCF 13.3x 18.3x 8.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.2x 14.9x 7.4x
P/S 2.3x 1.8x 1.6x
P/B 3.5x 5.6x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 3.7x 13.2x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 9.7x 22.7x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 37.7x 53.5x 12.1x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 1.9x 1.4x
EV/FCF 10.1x 19.3x 7.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.5x 15.7x 6.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.27 0.71 -0.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIVNOOMASPOK
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.9% 17.2% -3.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 10.3% -0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% 18.1% -4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 9.3% -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 408.8% 723.3% -23.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 38.1% 68.2% -2.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 573.6% 823.4% -28.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% 74.7% -29.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 597.6% 804.6% -29.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.2% 70.9% -30.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.7% 42.8% -0.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.0% 51.7% 6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 46.8% 50.0% 0.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.5% 86.0% 9.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIVNOOMASPOK
Gross margin 54.9% 61.5% 78.1%
EBITDA margin 18.2% 8.4% 14.6%
Operating margin 4.7% 3.6% 11.9%
Pretax margin 5.5% 2.9% 12.5%
Net margin 4.9% 3.6% 9.0%
FCF margin 17.4% 9.9% 18.7%
Operating cash flow margin 20.7% 12.1% 21.0%
Return on equity 7.4% 11.1% 8.7%
Return on assets 3.2% 4.8% 6.3%
Return on invested capital – 7.4% –
Return on capital employed 3.5% 7.1% 10.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.2x 3.4x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 11.0% 4.7% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIVNOOMASPOK
Debt / assets – 20.5% –
Debt / equity – 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.1x –
Debt / FCF – 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 57.1% 56.5% 28.5%
Equity / assets 42.9% 43.5% 71.5%
Interest coverage 4.4x – –
Current ratio 4.1x 1.0x 1.1x
Quick ratio 3.5x 0.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.55 3.30 3.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIVNOOMASPOK
Dividend yield – – 12.3%
Net buyback yield 3.1% 1.7% –
Shareholder yield 3.1% 1.7% 12.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 223.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 107.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 2.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIVNOOMASPOK
Forward P/E 10.9xFY2026 15.6xFY2026 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.41FY2026 $1.29FY2026 $0.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.2%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026 -14.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.2% +13.2% -34.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.31BFY2026 $319.05MFY2026 $144.30MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.8%FY2026 +16.6%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +14.4% -1.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIVNOOMASPOK
Held by institutions 100.0% 71.9% 51.6%
Institutions holding 290 167 131
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% +5.9% +3.0%
Institutions buying 151 102 76
Institutions selling 98 37 40
Buyers to sellers 1.54 2.76 1.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIVNOOMASPOK
FIVN 1.00 0.43 0.11
OOMA 0.43 1.00 0.13
SPOK 0.11 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIVN, OOMA and SPOK?

Five9 (FIVN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Five9 (FIVN) $2.83B, Ooma (OOMA) $564.94M, Spok Holdings (SPOK) $213.37M.

Which stock is cheaper, FIVN, OOMA and SPOK?

Spok Holdings (SPOK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Five9 (FIVN) 47.6x, Ooma (OOMA) 51.7x, Spok Holdings (SPOK) 17.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five9 (FIVN) is cheapest (Five9 (FIVN) 10.9x, Ooma (OOMA) 15.6x, Spok Holdings (SPOK) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ooma (OOMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Five9 (FIVN) +8.9%, Ooma (OOMA) +17.2%, Spok Holdings (SPOK) -3.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Spok Holdings (SPOK) has the highest net margin (Five9 (FIVN) 4.9%, Ooma (OOMA) 3.6%, Spok Holdings (SPOK) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ooma (OOMA) returned the most: Five9 (FIVN) +56.9%, Ooma (OOMA) +75.0%, Spok Holdings (SPOK) -38.2%. Over five years, Spok Holdings (SPOK) compounded fastest (Five9 (FIVN) -25.2%/yr, Ooma (OOMA) -1.9%/yr, Spok Holdings (SPOK) -0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Five9 (FIVN) 0.00%, Ooma (OOMA) 0.00%, Spok Holdings (SPOK) 0.13%. Five9 (FIVN) and Ooma (OOMA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Spok Holdings (SPOK) has been the steadiest (Five9 (FIVN) 68.5%, Ooma (OOMA) 45.5%, Spok Holdings (SPOK) 31.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIVN, OOMA and SPOK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Spok Holdings (SPOK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.