FITB vs RF vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp, Regions Financial and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$53.58 +2.9% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$48.57B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.16B
Div. yield
3.02%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.29B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.88%
Regional Banks Financial Services
5 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
19.35%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 5, Fifth Third Bancorp 4, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFITBRFUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.57B $24.29B $2.49B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 11.3x -14.1x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x 10.2x 8.2x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% +4.4% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.2% 28.2% -1.0% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.9% 14.6% 6.3% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x 10.6x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.02% 3.88% 19.35% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.2% +17.6% -73.5% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr +3.7%/yr -25.6%/yr FITB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 23.3% 80.1% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 39/100 36/100 FITB

Percentile Scorecard

FITBRFUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFITBRFUWMC
Valuation 12 #318 of 360 24 #275 of 360 20 #136 of 169
Growth 23 #148 of 191 10 #173 of 191 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 46 #92 of 168 49 #87 of 168 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 50 #88 of 175 49 #90 of 175 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 72 #98 of 341 64 #123 of 341 95 #8 of 136
Overall 40 39 36
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFITBRFUWMCSPY
1 month +2.9%+3.2%+26.0% -0.2%
3 months -7.3%-8.8%-17.1% +3.9%
6 months +6.5%+0.6%-57.5% +8.2%
Year to date +14.5%+5.2%-64.6% +12.9%
1 year +26.2%+17.6%-73.5% +12.3%
3 years +134.1%+103.5%-68.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +32.8%+26.7%-32.3% +23.3%
5 years +21.8%+20.1%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +4.0%+3.7%-25.6% +10.9%
10 years +145.6%+163.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.4%+10.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFITBRFUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%23.3%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.7%25.6%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.700.661.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.050.75-0.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.6%-44.9%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.7%-12.0%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $59.36$32.40$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $41.12$24.07$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFITBRFUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 18.4xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x 15.3xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x -0.5xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median -2.90median 1.34 5.19median 1.34 0.28median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFITBRFUWMC
Revenue $10.16B $7.62B $3.58B
Net income $2.81B $2.23B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $1.67B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $2.91 $2.51 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $4.37B – $498.41M
Total debt $22.27B $7.63B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 916.00M 857.00M 337.53M
Enterprise value -$33.66B $24.36B $1.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFITBRFUWMC
P/E 18.4x 11.3x -14.1x
P/FCF – 14.6x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.7x -0.5x
P/S 4.8x 3.2x 0.7x
P/B 1.4x 1.3x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.4x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – 6.5x 15.3x
EV/EBIT 6.1x 6.7x 17.3x
EV/Revenue 4.6x 4.2x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 19.1x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.0x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.90 5.19 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFITBRFUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% 4.4% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.6% -0.7% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 20.2% 7.5% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% -1.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.3% 15.6% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 2.2% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFITBRFUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 35.4% 37.4% -3.2%
Net margin 26.2% 28.2% -1.0%
FCF margin – 21.9% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% -135.9%
Return on equity 10.0% 11.8% -8.1%
Return on assets 1.1% 1.4% -0.6%
Return on invested capital 12.9% 14.6% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFITBRFUWMC
Debt / assets 7.4% 4.7% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 88.5% 88.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 11.5% 11.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage 1.9x 2.5x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFITBRFUWMC
Dividend yield 3.0% 3.9% 19.4%
Net buyback yield – 4.7% –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 8.6% 19.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFITBRFUWMC
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $2.80FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.8%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +61.3% -4.3% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.18BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.7%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.3% +16.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFITBRFUWMC
Held by institutions 90.8% 84.8% 17.0%
Institutions holding 1,303 1,104 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +2.9% +31.8%
Institutions buying 691 558 213
Institutions selling 406 347 50
Buyers to sellers 1.70 1.61 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FITBRFUWMC
FITB 1.00 0.88 0.19
RF 0.88 1.00 0.23
UWMC 0.19 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FITB, RF and UWMC?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $48.57B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.29B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.49B.

Which stock is cheaper, FITB, RF and UWMC?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 18.4x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -14.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.0x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +17.1%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 26.2%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 12.9%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +26.2%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%. Over five years, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) compounded fastest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.0%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 3.02%, Regions Financial (RF) 3.88%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 19.35%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 24.9%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FITB, RF and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.