FITB vs BSAC vs UBSI Stock Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp, Banco Santander Chile and United Bankshares Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$54.44 +6.8% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$49.03B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.16B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.46 -6.3% 1M +11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.34B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UBSI United Bankshares Inc/Wv
$48.71 +5.5% 1M +36.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.66B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.28B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

United Bankshares leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (United Bankshares 5, Banco Santander Chile 3, Fifth Third Bancorp 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFITBBSACUBSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.03B $14.34B $6.66B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 0.0x 12.9x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.3x 11.1x 12.3x BSAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% — +14.5% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.2% — 40.2% UBSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.9% — 16.0% UBSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.3% +11.2% +36.1% UBSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.6%/yr +12.2%/yr +5.7%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 28.9% 20.5% UBSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 34/100 72/100 UBSI

Percentile Scorecard

FITBBSACUBSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFITBBSACUBSI
Valuation 11 #322 of 361 11 #321 of 361 31 #250 of 361
Growth 26 #114 of 153 22 #120 of 153 61 #61 of 153
Profitability 47 #69 of 128 – 84 #21 of 128
Financial Health 55 #63 of 140 9 #127 of 140 96 #7 of 140
Shareholder Returns 70 #100 of 335 93 #24 of 335 87 #44 of 335
Overall 42 34 72
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UBSI ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFITBBSACUBSISPY
1 month +6.8%-6.3%+5.5% +0.7%
3 months -3.8%-10.2%+0.7% +3.7%
6 months +7.2%-1.6%+11.2% +7.1%
Year to date +16.3%+1.1%+26.8% +12.8%
1 year +30.3%+11.2%+36.1% +11.9%
3 years +132.8%+81.1%+73.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +32.6%+21.9%+20.1% +22.8%
5 years +25.1%+77.5%+31.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +4.6%+12.2%+5.7% +10.9%
10 years +151.9%+41.3%+32.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +9.7%+3.5%+2.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFITBBSACUBSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%28.9%20.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.8%30.4%20.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.691.090.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.220.391.76 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.6%-40.5%-40.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.3%-16.0%-1.3% -1.2%
52-week high $59.36$37.46$49.37 $779.14
52-week low $41.12$28.30$34.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFITBBSACUBSI
P/E now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 12.2x 0.0xmedian 12.2x 13.0xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x 5.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 0.0xmedian 5.3x —median 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x -480.8xmedian 10.8x 12.4xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -2.94median 1.34 0.00median 1.34 1.54median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFITBBSACUBSI
Revenue $10.16B – $1.28B
Operating income – $278.26B –
Net income $2.81B -$1.70T $515.15M
Free cash flow – – $533.93M
EPS (diluted) $2.91 $1,126.89 $3.72
Cash & equivalents $4.37B $2.20B –
Total debt $22.27B $47.85B $532.62M
Shares (diluted) 916.00M 471.12M 138.42M
Enterprise value -$33.20B -$10.98T $6.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFITBBSACUBSI
P/E 18.7x 0.0x 13.0x
P/FCF – -480.8x 12.4x
P/Operating cash flow – – 11.9x
P/S 4.9x 2.8x 5.2x
P/B 1.4x 2.4x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -0.2x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA – 0.0x –
EV/EBIT 6.2x 0.2x 5.9x
EV/Revenue 4.7x – 5.6x
EV/FCF – – 13.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.94 0.00 1.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFITBBSACUBSI
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% – 14.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.6% – 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -85.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 20.2% -229.4% 30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% -114.2% 9.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.3% -18.5% 34.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 48.4% 8.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 18.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 7.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 16.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 7.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFITBBSACUBSI
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 35.4% – 50.3%
Net margin 26.2% – 40.2%
FCF margin – – 41.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – 43.3%
Return on equity 10.0% – 9.4%
Return on assets 1.1% 2,022% 1.5%
Return on invested capital 12.9% – 16.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFITBBSACUBSI
Debt / assets 7.4% 63.2% 1.6%
Debt / equity 0.6x 7.7x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.0x –
Debt / FCF – – 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 88.5% 91.8% 83.7%
Equity / assets 11.5% 8.2% 16.3%
Interest coverage 1.9x – 2.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFITBBSACUBSI
Dividend yield 3.0% 4.7% 3.1%
Net buyback yield – – 3.1%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 4.7% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFITBBSACUBSI
Forward P/E 17.3xFY2026 11.1xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $2.84FY2026 $3.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.8%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +21.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +61.3% +2.5% +6.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.18BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $1.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.7%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.3% +19.1% +6.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFITBBSACUBSI
Held by institutions 90.8% 4.7% 74.7%
Institutions holding 1,305 157 449
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +1.7% +2.9%
Institutions buying 692 82 224
Institutions selling 407 51 123
Buyers to sellers 1.70 1.61 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FITBBSACUBSI
FITB 1.00 0.30 0.76
BSAC 0.30 1.00 0.21
UBSI 0.76 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FITB, BSAC and UBSI?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $49.03B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.34B, United Bankshares (UBSI) $6.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, FITB, BSAC and UBSI?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 18.4x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, United Bankshares (UBSI) 12.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is cheapest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.3x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.1x, United Bankshares (UBSI) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +17.1%, United Bankshares (UBSI) +14.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Bankshares (UBSI) has the highest net margin (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 26.2%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 40.2%). On return on invested capital, United Bankshares (UBSI) leads (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 12.9%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 16.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Bankshares (UBSI) returned the most: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +30.3%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.2%, United Bankshares (UBSI) +36.1%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.6%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.2%/yr, United Bankshares (UBSI) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United Bankshares (UBSI) has been the steadiest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 24.9%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 20.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FITB, BSAC and UBSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Bankshares (UBSI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.