FIP vs OMAB vs SEAL-PA Stock Comparison

FTAI Infrastructure, Central North Airport and Seapeak Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SEAL-PA Seapeak LLC
$25.17 -1.0% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.20B
P/E
281.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$618.58M
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 5, Seapeak 3, FTAI Infrastructure 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIPOMABSEAL-PALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $406.48M $5.29B $2.20B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.7x 17.7x 281.3x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.7x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +72.3% — -8.4% FIP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -91.9% — 1.3% SEAL-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -15.3% — 4.0% SEAL-PA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -11.3x — 1.6x FIP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -42.9% +1.9% -2.0% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +17.3%/yr -0.2%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 69.9% 30.5% 7.0% SEAL-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 42/100 37/100 OMAB

Percentile Scorecard

FIPOMABSEAL-PA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Valuation 1 #136 of 137 24 #105 of 137 40 #83 of 137
Growth 25 #96 of 127 – 21 #101 of 127
Profitability 2 #122 of 125 – 52 #60 of 125
Financial Health 1 #146 of 147 34 #98 of 147 37 #93 of 147
Shareholder Returns 67 #30 of 90 70 #28 of 90 –
Overall 19 42 37
  • FIP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SEAL-PA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIPOMABSEAL-PASPY
1 month +10.1%+15.2%-1.0% -5.9%
3 months -27.4%-1.9%-2.2% -4.6%
6 months -42.7%+1.9%-2.1% +0.2%
Year to date -36.2%+0.3%-0.7% +7.5%
1 year -42.9%+1.9%-2.0% +8.2%
3 years -8.1%+60.5%+2.5% +68.3%
3 years, per year -2.8%+17.1%+0.8% +19.0%
5 years —+122.1%-1.0% +56.5%
5 years, per year —+17.3%-0.2% +9.4%
10 years —+141.0%+2.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+9.2%+0.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFIPOMABSEAL-PASPY
Volatility, 1Y 69.9%30.5%7.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.1%27.7%8.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.550.920.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.610.06-0.29 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.6%-42.1%-15.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.3%-19.2%-3.6% -5.9%
52-week high $6.44$134.98$26.10 $779.14
52-week low $2.31$88.75$24.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIPOMABSEAL-PA
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 14.1x 17.7xmedian 14.1x 280.1xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.9x 5.9xmedian 0.9x 3.5xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 7.8x —median 7.8x 9.2xmedian 7.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 11.7x 13.0xmedian 11.7x 8.8xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 1.2x 8.3xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.68 —median 0.68 -4.09median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Revenue $659.21M – $618.58M
Gross profit – – $610.21M
Operating income – – $123.38M
Net income -$468.91M – $53.35M
Free cash flow -$318.87M – $248.29M
EPS (diluted) $-5.13 – $0.09
Cash & equivalents $32.63M $172.32M $77.11M
Total debt $2.76B $756.57M $545.29M
Shares (diluted) 118.16M – 87.22M
Enterprise value $243.92M $4.77B $1.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIPOMABSEAL-PA
P/E -0.6x 17.7x 280.1x
P/FCF -1.1x 13.0x 8.8x
P/Operating cash flow -6.0x – 8.8x
P/S 0.5x 5.9x 3.5x
P/B -0.7x 8.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -0.6x -10.6x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA -12.7x – 9.2x
EV/EBIT -7.0x – 21.5x
EV/Revenue 4.7x – 4.3x
EV/FCF -9.7x – 10.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -53.6x – 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 – -4.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Revenue growth (1Y) 72.3% – -8.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.8% – -3.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -7.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -2.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 187.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -24.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -299.3% – 124.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -40.5% – -43.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -273.4% – 103.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.9% – -68.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 32.1% – -34.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -138.6% – -12.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.8% – -34.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.6% – -0.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Gross margin – – 98.6%
EBITDA margin -36.8% – 46.5%
Operating margin – – 19.9%
Pretax margin -66.7% – 8.9%
Net margin -91.9% – 1.3%
FCF margin -48.4% – 40.1%
Operating cash flow margin -8.7% – 40.1%
Return on equity – – 2.4%
Return on assets -8.2% – 1.0%
Return on invested capital -15.3% – 4.0%
Return on capital employed -10.0% – 2.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x – 4.7x
Stock comp / revenue 3.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Debt / assets 48.1% 44.0% 10.3%
Debt / equity -5.3x 1.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -11.3x – 1.6x
Debt / FCF -8.7x – 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 109.0% 63.1% 57.6%
Equity / assets -9.0% 36.9% 42.4%
Interest coverage – – 0.7x
Current ratio 0.3x 1.3x 0.4x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.2x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -0.49 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Dividend yield 4.1% 5.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.1% 5.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -3.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -4.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 14.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Forward P/E – 16.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.58FY2026 $6.54FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +2.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $701.40MFY2026 $919.92MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +39.6%FY2026 -0.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.4% +18.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIPOMABSEAL-PA
Held by institutions 87.9% 12.3% –
Institutions holding 178 163 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% +5.4% –
Institutions buying 87 77 –
Institutions selling 47 59 –
Buyers to sellers 1.85 1.31 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIPOMABSEAL-PA
FIP 1.00 0.22 -0.02
OMAB 0.22 1.00 0.06
SEAL-PA -0.02 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIP, OMAB and SEAL-PA?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) $406.48M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $5.29B, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) $2.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, FIP, OMAB and SEAL-PA?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -0.7x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 17.7x, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) 281.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) +72.3%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) -8.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Seapeak (SEAL-PA) has the highest net margin (FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -91.9%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) leads (FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -15.3%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) 4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -42.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) +1.9%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) -2.0%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +17.3%/yr, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) -0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 0.03%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) 0.00%. Central North Airport (OMAB) and Seapeak (SEAL-PA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) has been the steadiest (FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 69.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 30.5%, Seapeak (SEAL-PA) 7.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIP, OMAB and SEAL-PA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.