FIGS vs KTB vs URBN Stock Comparison

Figs, Kontoor Brands and Urban Outfitters Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.48 +52.5% 1M +151.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.23B
P/E
55.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$74.87 +14.6% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.09B
P/E
16.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
2.83%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
URBN Urban Outfitters Inc
$90.73 +20.4% 1M +34.1% 1Y
Market cap
$7.77B
P/E
13.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.47B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Retail Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Urban Outfitters leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Urban Outfitters 7, Figs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGSKTBURBNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.23B $4.09B $7.77B URBN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 55.1x 16.5x 13.7x URBN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 56.9x 13.7x 13.7x URBN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.7% +18.6% +11.0% FIGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.7% 8.5% 8.8% URBN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.83% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +151.3% -13.0% +34.1% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.2%/yr +7.2%/yr +23.4%/yr URBN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.3% 47.8% 42.8% URBN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 52/100 78/100 URBN

Percentile Scorecard

FIGSKTBURBN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGSKTBURBN
Valuation 11 #40 of 45 23 #35 of 45 59 #43 of 104
Growth 100 #1 of 43 57 #19 of 43 80 #21 of 99
Profitability 80 #9 of 41 88 #6 of 41 81 #19 of 98
Financial Health 96 #3 of 52 31 #36 of 52 85 #18 of 112
Shareholder Returns 39 #21 of 34 61 #14 of 34 85 #12 of 72
Overall 65 52 78
  • FIGS ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • URBN ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGSKTBURBNSPY
1 month +52.5%+14.6%+20.4% -0.2%
3 months +98.3%-15.0%+20.7% +3.9%
6 months +36.4%+3.9%+30.0% +8.2%
Year to date +80.3%+22.6%+20.6% +12.9%
1 year +151.3%-13.0%+34.1% +12.3%
3 years +259.3%+60.5%+168.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +53.2%+17.1%+39.0% +23.3%
5 years -38.2%+41.8%+186.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.2%+7.2%+23.4% +10.9%
10 years ——+170.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+10.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFIGSKTBURBNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.3%47.8%42.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.6%45.8%39.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.740.780.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.15-0.270.79 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.5%-48.3%-52.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.7%-15.1%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $20.83$88.17$90.73 $779.14
52-week low $7.38$57.48$59.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGSKTBURBN
P/E now vs peer median 55.1xmedian 16.4x 16.5xmedian 16.4x 13.7xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.1xmedian 9.9x —median 9.9x 8.1xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 26.3xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 2.2x 6.6xmedian 2.2x 2.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.90median 0.64 2.19median 0.64 0.34median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGSKTBURBN
Revenue $710.08M $2.95B $6.47B
Gross profit $489.29M $1.38B $2.43B
Operating income $68.19M $332.45M $731.44M
Net income $61.92M $249.37M $569.06M
Free cash flow $97.22M – $295.21M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $4.49 $6.57
Cash & equivalents $108.54M $58.46M $598.76M
Total debt – $1.14B –
Shares (diluted) 195.14M 55.50M 86.67M
Enterprise value $2.11B $3.79B $5.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBURBN
P/E 55.1x 16.5x 13.7x
P/FCF 33.2x – 26.3x
P/Operating cash flow 29.9x – 10.9x
P/S 4.5x 1.4x 1.2x
P/B 7.3x 6.6x 2.7x
P/Tangible book 7.3x 24.0x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 37.1x – 8.1x
EV/EBIT 43.0x 15.6x 9.6x
EV/Revenue 4.1x 1.8x 1.1x
EV/FCF 30.1x – 23.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.1x – 9.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.90 2.19 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBURBN
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.7% 18.6% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 4.0% 9.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.8% 22.2% 16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 7.9% 16.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 583.6% 6.3% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 41.0% 1.5% 34.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 762.2% -0.8% 19.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.4% 6.7% 36.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 664.0% 0.1% 25.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 7.5% 40.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 116.9% – 21.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 82.7% – 22.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 143.8% – -26.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.2% – 11.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBURBN
Gross margin 68.9% 46.8% 37.5%
EBITDA margin 11.1% – 13.5%
Operating margin 9.6% 11.3% 11.3%
Pretax margin 10.8% 9.8% 11.1%
Net margin 8.7% 8.5% 8.8%
FCF margin 13.7% – 4.6%
Operating cash flow margin 15.2% – 11.1%
Return on equity 14.2% 41.3% 20.8%
Return on assets 10.8% 9.3% 11.5%
Return on invested capital – 14.5% –
Return on capital employed 14.2% 16.6% 19.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBURBN
Debt / assets – 42.9% –
Debt / equity – 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 24.1% 76.8% 44.3%
Equity / assets 75.9% 23.2% 55.7%
Interest coverage – 4.9x –
Current ratio 5.0x 1.8x 1.6x
Quick ratio 3.7x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash ratio 3.2x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 16.46 3.10 4.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBURBN
Dividend yield – 2.8% –
Net buyback yield 0.9% – 3.9%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 2.8% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGSKTBURBN
Forward P/E 56.9xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 13.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.36FY2026 $5.45FY2026 $6.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +89.5%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026 +21.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after 0.0% +12.1% -3.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $728.69MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $7.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.5%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% -5.1% +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGSKTBURBN
Held by institutions 99.1% 100.0% 71.7%
Institutions holding 242 429 416
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% +6.9% -0.4%
Institutions buying 139 214 205
Institutions selling 69 137 150
Buyers to sellers 2.01 1.56 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGSKTBURBN
FIGS 1.00 0.16 0.17
KTB 0.16 1.00 0.36
URBN 0.17 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIGS, KTB and URBN?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figs (FIGS) $3.23B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.09B, Urban Outfitters (URBN) $7.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, FIGS, KTB and URBN?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Figs (FIGS) 55.1x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.5x, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 13.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Urban Outfitters (URBN) is cheapest (Figs (FIGS) 56.9x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.7x, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 13.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Figs (FIGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figs (FIGS) +24.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) has the highest net margin (Figs (FIGS) 8.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Figs (FIGS) +151.3%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) -13.0%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +34.1%. Over five years, Urban Outfitters (URBN) compounded fastest (Figs (FIGS) -9.2%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.2%/yr, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +23.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kontoor Brands (KTB) 2.83%. Figs (FIGS) and Urban Outfitters (URBN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Urban Outfitters (URBN) has been the steadiest (Figs (FIGS) 70.3%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.8%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIGS, KTB and URBN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Urban Outfitters (URBN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.