FIGS vs KTB vs UAA Stock Comparison

Figs, Kontoor Brands and Under Armour Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WRBY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.05 +42.2% 1M +164.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.15B
P/E
45.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$749.11M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$79.05 +20.0% 1M +2.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.32B
P/E
21.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.45B
Div. yield
2.68%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
UAA Under Armour, Inc.
$5.55 +13.5% 1M +20.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.93B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kontoor Brands leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Kontoor Brands 7, Figs 3, Under Armour 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGSKTBUAALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.15B $4.32B $2.37B KTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 45.9x 21.4x -4.8x KTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 57.3x 14.5x 46.3x KTB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.9% +51.4% -3.6% KTB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.7% 5.8% -10.0% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.4% -5.2% KTB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x -18.3x UAA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.68% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +164.5% +2.8% +20.4% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.1%/yr +6.5%/yr -26.0%/yr KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.8% 47.2% 55.0% KTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 57/100 26/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

FIGSKTBUAA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGSKTBUAA
Valuation 17 #40 of 48 38 #30 of 48 28 #35 of 48
Growth 100 #1 of 46 76 #12 of 46 2 #45 of 46
Profitability 89 #6 of 45 84 #8 of 45 9 #41 of 45
Financial Health 94 #4 of 52 28 #38 of 52 45 #29 of 52
Shareholder Returns 68 #12 of 35 62 #14 of 35 47 #19 of 35
Overall 73 57 26
  • FIGS ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • UAA ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGSKTBUAASPY
1 month +42.2%+20.0%+13.5% -5.9%
3 months +78.2%+0.4%-13.1% -4.6%
6 months +30.4%+1.3%-13.1% +0.2%
Year to date +76.5%+29.4%+11.7% +7.5%
1 year +164.5%+2.8%+20.4% +8.2%
3 years +200.6%+59.4%-21.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year +44.4%+16.8%-7.9% +19.0%
5 years -53.2%+36.8%-77.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -14.1%+6.5%-26.0% +9.4%
10 years ——-82.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——-15.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFIGSKTBUAASPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.8%47.2%55.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.6%43.7%56.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.831.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.320.060.37 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.0%-48.3%-84.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.6%-10.3%-31.8% -5.9%
52-week high $21.94$88.17$8.14 $779.14
52-week low $7.52$57.48$4.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGSKTBUAA
P/E now vs peer median 45.9xmedian 17.1x 21.4xmedian 17.1x -4.8xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 0.8x 1.3xmedian 0.8x 0.5xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.9xmedian 10.6x 10.4xmedian 10.6x -240.8xmedian 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.3xmedian 11.6x 10.5xmedian 11.6x -29.3xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 2.4x 7.7xmedian 2.4x 1.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.74median 0.57 -35.94median 0.57 0.10median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGSKTBUAA
Revenue $749.11M $3.45B $4.93B
Gross profit $515.30M $1.72B $2.31B
Operating income $80.76M $468.77M -$119.70M
Net income $72.46M $201.45M -$492.49M
Free cash flow $147.87M $413.09M -$81.12M
EPS (diluted) $0.37 $3.69 $-1.14
Cash & equivalents $76.47M $56.35M $395.98M
Total debt – $1.14B $591.16M
Shares (diluted) 193.28M 54.63M 431.94M
Enterprise value $1.95B $4.07B -$1.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBUAA
P/E 45.9x 21.4x -4.8x
P/FCF 21.3x 10.5x -29.3x
P/Operating cash flow 19.5x 9.9x -160.4x
P/S 4.2x 1.3x 0.5x
P/B 7.0x 7.7x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 7.0x 47.4x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 30.9x 10.4x -240.8x
EV/EBIT 34.9x 11.5x -21.5x
EV/Revenue 3.8x 1.6x 0.5x
EV/FCF 19.1x 13.1x -31.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.5x 12.4x -173.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.74 -35.94 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBUAA
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.9% 51.4% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 9.0% -5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.5% 73.4% -6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 15.9% -4.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 186.0% 123.2% -201.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 51.8% 12.6% -35.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 311.0% -7.5% -585.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 65.3% -2.0% -48.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 284.7% -5.0% -579.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.9% -0.6% -49.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 426.6% 74.2% 90.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.7% 25.8% -26.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 572.4% 79.9% 74.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 29.2% -29.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBUAA
Gross margin 68.8% 49.9% 46.8%
EBITDA margin 12.2% 15.1% -0.2%
Operating margin 10.8% 13.6% -2.4%
Pretax margin 11.9% 11.6% -3.4%
Net margin 9.7% 5.8% -10.0%
FCF margin 19.7% 12.0% -1.6%
Operating cash flow margin 21.6% 12.6% -0.3%
Return on equity 16.2% 45.2% -34.6%
Return on assets 12.1% 9.8% -11.6%
Return on invested capital – 14.4% -5.2%
Return on capital employed 16.4% 23.6% -4.1%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 2.2x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 3.3% 1.0% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBUAA
Debt / assets – 40.8% 14.4%
Debt / equity – 2.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x -18.3x
Debt / FCF – 2.8x -7.3x
Liabilities / assets 26.9% 79.9% 65.2%
Equity / assets 73.1% 20.1% 34.8%
Interest coverage – 6.9x –
Current ratio 4.4x 1.7x 1.8x
Quick ratio 3.1x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 3.0x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 14.08 3.27 2.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBUAA
Dividend yield – 2.7% –
Net buyback yield 1.4% 3.1% 1.0%
Shareholder yield 1.4% 5.7% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 58.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGSKTBUAA
Forward P/E 57.3xFY2026 14.5xFY2026 46.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.35FY2026 $5.46FY2026 $0.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +84.2%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.9% +11.4% +58.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $728.69MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $4.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.5%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 -7.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% -4.8% +9.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGSKTBUAA
Held by institutions 99.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 245 433 378
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% +6.9% +3.8%
Institutions buying 140 218 178
Institutions selling 69 137 120
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.59 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGSKTBUAA
FIGS 1.00 0.18 0.13
KTB 0.18 1.00 0.38
UAA 0.13 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIGS, KTB and UAA?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figs (FIGS) $3.15B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.32B, Under Armour (UAA) $2.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, FIGS, KTB and UAA?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Figs (FIGS) 45.9x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 21.4x, Under Armour (UAA) -4.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kontoor Brands (KTB) is cheapest (Figs (FIGS) 57.3x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.5x, Under Armour (UAA) 46.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figs (FIGS) +28.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +51.4%, Under Armour (UAA) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Figs (FIGS) 9.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 5.8%, Under Armour (UAA) -10.0%). On return on invested capital, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.4%, Under Armour (UAA) -5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Figs (FIGS) +164.5%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +2.8%, Under Armour (UAA) +20.4%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Figs (FIGS) -14.1%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +6.5%/yr, Under Armour (UAA) -26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kontoor Brands (KTB) 2.68%. Figs (FIGS) and Under Armour (UAA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kontoor Brands (KTB) has been the steadiest (Figs (FIGS) 70.8%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.2%, Under Armour (UAA) 55.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIGS, KTB and UAA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.