FIGS vs KTB vs GIL Stock Comparison

Figs, Kontoor Brands and Gildan Activewear Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.83 +55.1% 1M +153.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.42B
P/E
55.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$75.69 +15.8% 1M -10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.15B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$40.35 -1.5% 1M -33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.45B
P/E
30.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Gildan Activewear leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gildan Activewear 4, Kontoor Brands 3, Figs 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGSKTBGILLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.42B $4.15B $6.45B GIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 55.2x 16.7x 30.6x KTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 57.9x 13.9x 8.4x GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.7% +18.6% +38.0% GIL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.7% 8.5% 4.5% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.5% 5.2% KTB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +153.1% -10.9% -33.2% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.7%/yr +7.5%/yr +2.3%/yr KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.4% 47.9% 42.3% GIL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 52/100 35/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

FIGSKTBGIL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGSKTBGIL
Valuation 13 #40 of 46 22 #36 of 46 33 #31 of 46
Growth 100 #1 of 43 57 #19 of 43 52 #21 of 43
Profitability 81 #9 of 42 88 #6 of 42 44 #24 of 42
Financial Health 96 #3 of 53 31 #37 of 53 29 #38 of 53
Shareholder Returns 46 #19 of 34 61 #14 of 34 18 #28 of 34
Overall 67 52 35
  • FIGS ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • GIL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGSKTBGILSPY
1 month +55.1%+15.8%-1.5% -0.8%
3 months +109.8%-11.8%-20.4% +3.5%
6 months +33.4%+8.9%-30.3% +7.0%
Year to date +83.4%+23.9%-35.4% +12.2%
1 year +153.1%-10.9%-33.2% +13.0%
3 years +265.4%+62.2%+47.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +54.1%+17.5%+13.9% +23.1%
5 years -36.4%+43.5%+11.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -8.7%+7.5%+2.3% +11.0%
10 years ——+57.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+4.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFIGSKTBGILSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.4%47.9%42.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.9%46.0%44.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.750.791.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.17-0.23-0.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.5%-48.3%-44.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-14.2%-44.4% -1.8%
52-week high $20.83$88.17$72.58 $779.14
52-week low $7.38$57.48$40.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGSKTBGIL
P/E now vs peer median 56.0xmedian 16.6x 16.7xmedian 16.6x 30.6xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.8xmedian 9.7x —median 9.7x 16.0xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.7xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x 10.6xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 2.2x 6.7xmedian 2.2x 2.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.92median 0.64 2.22median 0.64 -1.41median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGSKTBGIL
Revenue $710.08M $2.95B $4.72B
Gross profit $489.29M $1.38B $1.41B
Operating income $68.19M $332.45M $380.85M
Net income $61.92M $249.37M -$60.80M
Free cash flow $97.22M – $703.50M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $4.49 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $108.54M $58.46M $268.30M
Total debt – $1.14B $3.59B
Shares (diluted) 195.14M 55.50M 160.20M
Enterprise value $2.30B $3.85B $5.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBGIL
P/E 56.0x 16.7x 30.6x
P/FCF 33.7x – 10.6x
P/Operating cash flow 30.4x – 12.6x
P/S 4.6x 1.4x 1.6x
P/B 7.4x 6.7x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 24.2x 21.5x
EV/EBITDA 37.8x – 16.0x
EV/EBIT 43.8x 15.7x 28.3x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 1.8x 2.3x
EV/FCF 30.7x – 15.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.6x – 18.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.92 2.22 -1.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBGIL
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.7% 18.6% 38.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 4.0% 14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.8% 22.2% 10.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 7.9% 16.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 583.6% 6.3% -29.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 41.0% 1.5% -13.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 762.2% -0.8% -127.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.4% 6.7% -28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 664.0% 0.1% -16.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 7.5% -21.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 116.9% – 273.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 82.7% – 32.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 143.8% – 141.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 98.2% – 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBGIL
Gross margin 68.9% 46.8% 30.0%
EBITDA margin 11.1% – 14.3%
Operating margin 9.6% 11.3% 8.1%
Pretax margin 10.8% 9.8% 7.6%
Net margin 8.7% 8.5% 4.5%
FCF margin 13.7% – 14.9%
Operating cash flow margin 15.2% – 12.6%
Return on equity 14.2% 41.3% 1.5%
Return on assets 10.8% 9.3% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 14.5% 5.2%
Return on capital employed 14.2% 16.6% 4.8%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – -9.7x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBGIL
Debt / assets – 42.9% 35.7%
Debt / equity – 1.8x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.9x
Debt / FCF – – 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 24.1% 76.8% 66.8%
Equity / assets 75.9% 23.2% 33.2%
Interest coverage – 4.9x 1.8x
Current ratio 5.0x 1.8x 1.9x
Quick ratio 3.7x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 3.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 16.70 3.11 1.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGSKTBGIL
Dividend yield – 2.8% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 0.9% – -3.7%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 2.8% -1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGSKTBGIL
Forward P/E 57.9xFY2026 13.9xFY2026 8.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.36FY2026 $5.45FY2026 $4.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +89.5%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026 +37.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after 0.0% +12.1% +17.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $728.69MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $5.67BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.5%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 +56.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% -5.1% +11.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGSKTBGIL
Held by institutions 99.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 242 429 463
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% +6.9% +7.8%
Institutions buying 139 214 197
Institutions selling 69 137 149
Buyers to sellers 2.01 1.56 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGSKTBGIL
FIGS 1.00 0.16 0.15
KTB 0.16 1.00 0.34
GIL 0.15 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIGS, KTB and GIL?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figs (FIGS) $3.42B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.15B, Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, FIGS, KTB and GIL?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Figs (FIGS) 55.2x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.7x, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 30.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Figs (FIGS) 57.9x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.9x, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 8.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figs (FIGS) +24.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +38.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Figs (FIGS) 8.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 4.5%). On return on invested capital, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.5%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Figs (FIGS) +153.1%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) -10.9%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) -33.2%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Figs (FIGS) -8.7%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.5%/yr, Gildan Activewear (GIL) +2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gildan Activewear (GIL) has been the steadiest (Figs (FIGS) 70.4%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.9%, Gildan Activewear (GIL) 42.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIGS, KTB and GIL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gildan Activewear (GIL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.