FIGR vs FMCC vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Figure Technology Solutions, Federal Home Loan Mortgage and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$528.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal Home Loan Mortgage leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5, Figure Technology Solutions 3, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGRFMCCUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.99B $12.42B $528.23M FMCC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.0x -1,035x -14.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x 0.9x 7.4x FMCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +88.8% -1.3% +26.1% FIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 33.5% -0.1% -1.0% FIGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 38.9% 6.3% FMCC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.2% -63.3% -76.1% FIGR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +34.4%/yr -27.4%/yr FMCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.2% 84.9% 79.6% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 62/100 37/100 FMCC

Percentile Scorecard

FIGRFMCCUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGRFMCCUWMC
Valuation 15 #144 of 170 92 #14 of 170 21 #135 of 170
Growth 97 #6 of 160 59 #67 of 160 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 72 #43 of 149 70 #46 of 149 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 80 #32 of 158 27 #116 of 158 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 3 #131 of 135 – 97 #5 of 135
Overall 53 62 37
  • FIGR ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FMCC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGRFMCCUWMCSPY
1 month -31.3%-8.2%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months -24.0%-30.5%-24.3% +3.5%
6 months -33.4%-37.2%-62.6% +7.0%
Year to date -46.4%-61.5%-68.0% +12.2%
1 year -45.2%-63.3%-76.1% +13.0%
3 years —+509.4%-71.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+82.7%-34.6% +23.1%
5 years —+338.2%-79.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+34.4%-27.4% +11.0%
10 years —+137.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.1%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFIGRFMCCUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.2%84.9%79.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%72.2%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.621.281.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48-0.75-0.96 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.4%-78.9%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.4%-65.6%-77.0% -1.8%
52-week high $73.91$11.33$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $21.91$2.98$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGRFMCCUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 11.0x -1,051xmedian 11.0x -12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.6x 0.5xmedian 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x —median 13.1x 14.9xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -56.7xmedian 6.9x 0.9xmedian 6.9x -0.5xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 2.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 38.10median 0.32 0.25median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGRFMCCUWMC
Revenue $708.87M $23.63B $3.58B
Gross profit $620.58M – –
Operating income $201.41M – –
Net income $237.39M $12.95B -$104.96M
Free cash flow -$86.49M $14.28B -$4.92B
R&D $62.64M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.96 $0.00 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $1.44B $4.32B $498.41M
Total debt $963.50M $181.73B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 246.97M 3.23B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$208.92M -$6.32B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGRFMCCUWMC
P/E 20.5x -1,051x -12.7x
P/FCF -56.7x 0.9x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow -56.7x 0.9x -0.5x
P/S 6.9x 0.5x 0.6x
P/B 3.5x 0.2x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 0.2x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 14.9x
EV/EBIT 22.0x 1.5x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 6.2x 8.0x 2.2x
EV/FCF -51.2x 13.3x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -51.2x 13.3x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 38.10 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGRFMCCUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 88.8% -1.3% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 90.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 229.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 279.9% 12.5% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 17.3% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.1% 85.0% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -27.6% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.6% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.6% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGRFMCCUWMC
Gross margin 87.5% – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin 28.4% – –
Pretax margin 28.3% 68.2% -3.2%
Net margin 33.5% -0.1% -1.0%
FCF margin -12.2% 60.5% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin -12.2% 60.5% -135.9%
Return on equity 17.6% 17.1% -8.1%
Return on assets 8.3% 0.4% -0.6%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 38.9% 6.3%
Return on capital employed 12.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x 1.1x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue 15.4% – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGRFMCCUWMC
Debt / assets 31.9% 5.2% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.3x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF -11.1x 12.7x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 53.2% 97.8% 94.5%
Equity / assets 46.8% 2.2% 5.5%
Interest coverage 3.2x 1.1x 0.8x
Current ratio 1.9x – –
Quick ratio 1.2x – –
Cash ratio 1.1x – –
Altman Z-score 2.70 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGRFMCCUWMC
Dividend yield – – 21.4%
Net buyback yield -14.1% – –
Shareholder yield -14.1% 0.0% 21.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGRFMCCUWMC
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2026 0.9xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.07FY2026 $4.33FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +98.1%FY2026 +30.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +34.6% -12.7% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $841.68MFY2026 $23.94BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +63.5%FY2026 +2.9%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +50.1% +2.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGRFMCCUWMC
Held by institutions 66.8% 0.0% 79.7%
Institutions holding 307 12 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.9% +48.6% +31.8%
Institutions buying 196 5 213
Institutions selling 82 1 50
Buyers to sellers 2.39 5.00 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGRFMCCUWMC
FIGR 1.00 0.08 0.15
FMCC 0.08 1.00 0.05
UWMC 0.15 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIGR, FMCC and UWMC?

Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) $4.99B, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) $12.42B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $528.23M.

Which company is growing faster?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) +88.8%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -1.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) has the highest net margin (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 33.5%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -0.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) leads (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 8.9%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 38.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) returned the most: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) -45.2%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -63.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%. Over five years, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) compounded fastest (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +34.4%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 94.2%, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 84.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIGR, FMCC and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.